it_is_the_light wrote on Mar 5
th, 2018 at 5:01pm:
ProudKangaroo wrote on Mar 5
th, 2018 at 4:59pm:
it_is_the_light wrote on Mar 5
th, 2018 at 2:38pm:
If this thread is about "Draining the swamp", unless this is an example of the opposite of that, how is that on topic?
They are one of the great sources of manipulative fake news, how is them being more popular a good thing? They try to legitimise the new swamp...
oh dear ,
still stinging from your recent and bitter defeat it would appear ..
yet fear not , for in your sour graped fueled agitations you are forgiven
so rejoice ! then be at peace
namaste
- : ) ~
Mate, if I thought you were able to take part in a coherent debate without playing the reality twist that is required for you to keep living in your made up little bubble, I would go back to the flat earth thread and address the remaining 28 claims, but since you've already tripped and fallen over the rebuttal of the first claim, despite you claiming victory over it and still to today you refuse to answer, why should I bother?
Everything is a one sided debate with you. Either you agree with the person, or they're wrong no matter what. You don't budge, you don't state your claims, you don't bother to justify them and you seem deathly allergic to evidence.
You're doing there what you're doing here. Not one part of your reply was addressing the claim put to you.
Breitbart and their kin (Infowars etc) are purveyors of fake news. Everyone knows it and it's not really up for debate. Since you seem to care, when it suits you, about fake news, the idea of Breitbart gaining popularity should be a negative when it comes to "Draining the Swamp".
Are you not able to reconcile these two notions to the point want to drain the swamp and hating on fake news when an outlet you like is in the spotlight so you start playing the distraction game again?