ProudKangaroo wrote on Apr 10^th, 2017 at 2:14pm:


Like most intelligent people, I dont believe that the MSM is free from error. I do however, beleive them to be free of DELIBERATE error and that is the big difference. I know that media can be biased and often is, but that is not the same as being fake. Fox news has been known to be highly critical of Trump while MSNBC has been know to be critical of Obama and Clinton. A moderately intelligent person can work out the difference between lies and bias.

I dont have a major problem with the MSM other than their propensity for bias. Fox news does sometimes get pretty close to it with Hannity etc and you need to be careful in interpreting what they say.

BEST CNN FAKE NEWS EXPOSED CLIPS 2017! Don Lemon FAILS Trump Bush Trey Gowdy FAKE NEWS FAILS

ProudKangaroo wrote on Apr 11^th, 2017 at 9:11am:


Fattie is just a nutter. Facts are pretty movable items as far as he is concerned.  too many drugs, too many pizzas.

it_is_the_light wrote on Apr 11^th, 2017 at 10:17am:


Right, so Trump is your news source then?  Is that we are to take away from your post?

You talk about truth and fact yet you quote Trump?

Please...

ProudKangaroo wrote on Apr 10^th, 2017 at 11:07am:


putting aside this longwinded blowbag of inane conjecture and smoke with mirrors

as to look to the stars and heavens

if you cannot see this is fake news then you just keep your head up uranus

Proof TV Media 100% Fake - Fake/Green Screen Compliation (2014)

deliberate and true fake news ..

making up stories with blue screen and projecting this into every home on the planet

this is deliberate holly wood programming

and weekender and sad kangaroo cannot see that

they actually believe the lies !

and when someone points this out they attack like little children with abuse and ridicule at the one pointing out the lie ..

that dear reader , is truly sad and yet a great insight into the mentally deranged armchair pundit/punter throwing two ignorant cents with little sense into the ring

and so be it

it_is_the_light wrote on Apr 11^th, 2017 at 10:23am:


You've spent how many pages demanding to know where others source their news, or what sources they deem credible, you've been given answers to those questions then when the tables are turned and you're asked the same thing, you evade the question then claim anyone who wants to know the answer is using smoke and mirrors or is stuck in a false sense of reality?

You can't be serious?

That was you 2 pages ago?  Pathetic bloody hypocrite...

Quote:


I didn't say it was your news, I asked if it was your source, you posted a video of the President after you were asked what your source was.

And I watched the video, Trump mentions no report, not once.  All he does is manufacture claims without citing anything or sourcing anything, and ironically in doing so he was demanding that the media release the names of their sources.

What right does he have to demand truth from anyone, demand to know sources from anyone, when he and his administration shamelessly manufacture their own version of events that can be PROVEN are false.  PROVEN FALSE.  That means they're LYING and completely untrustworthy.

If you take anything they say, especially when they offer no sources as gospel truth, you're an idiot.

This is why I asked what your news source was, again, a question only a single page ago you seemed a valid one to ask of others.

But instead you've ignored that and posted a video of a proven liar to justify your stance on "fake news"? 

You're outraged at reporting that you deem not to be factual because it presents information you don't like, yet you use lies and bullshit to prosecute your case against lies and bullshit.

Come on...

Shall I post the video compilation of Trump's lies?  You know, with the sources, the transcripts and other proof to back it up?

You seem to like videos?  I can even tone down the production quality and make it look like it was from the 80's if you think that will give it that authentic vintage touch like the crap you post.

Quote:


You don't get to decide what is truthful or factual based purely on a whim and a narrative you support.  It's either truthful and factual, or it isn't.

Thus far you've posted a lot, and I mean a lot, of things, but it's just conjecture, innuendo, conspiracy hyperbole or flat out bullshit.

I challenge you to prove just one of your claims.  Just one.

And before you start ejaculating onto the keyboard, a provable claim does not constitute an example of something mildly related from 30 years ago then pretending that proves something totally different today.

The problem is, you seem to subscribe to the Illuminati conspiracies, which even if true are totally unproven.  In your world, the lack of being able to prove them is probably in itself proof of their existence I'm sure, but unfortunately unprovable self fulfilling prophecies do not constitute evidence.

Quote:


Join me in reality and prove your claims, or go flap yourself.

Namaste.

Let's not get too far off topic.  This all started because Michael Flynn has offered to testify before congressional committees about the Trump campaign's potential ties to Russia but wants "assurance against unfair prosecution".  This came from Flynn's own Lawyers and yes, it was reported on by MSNBC as it was by everyone else.

Rather than bothering to check the facts of their report, you've dismissed it because you considering them a "fake news source" despite the validity of the reporting in this case.

Then you took us down the rabbit hole of fake news with you distracting from the original post, not once bothering to deal with it.

And now we find ourselves arguing over news sources and you using every trick in the book to distract away from the topic of the thread.

Well, it won't work any longer.

So what we can do is remove news sources all together, that way there is no fake news involved, and you can read the statement from Flynn's lawyers here,

Flynn’s attorney, Robert Kelner's letter to the Press

So Flynn, after goading the audience of a Trump rally last year to cheer "Lock her up",


^{(unedited video hosted not by the "fake news media" but Right Side Broadcasting Network)}

He is now effectively saying "don't lock me up" in return for telling the truth about the Trump campaign's links with Russia.  He wants an immunity deal, but insists he's done no wrong. 

The problem is, by his own attacks on Clinton, he is probably guilty of a crime himself as in 2016, Flynn told Chuck Todd “When you are given immunity, that means that you have probably committed a crime.”,



So rather than wasting everyone's time trying to prove the media fake, why don't you address the topic of the thread, presented to you again not through the fake media, but directly from the sources with links to the material for you to verify. 

If you still want to go on about fake news or the main stream media, I suggest you do it elsewhere because it's off topic in this thread.

it_is_the_light wrote on Apr 11^th, 2017 at 12:14pm:


And what does that have to do with Mike Flynn?