Australian Politics Forum - The destruction of the AGW science by Murray Salby

lee Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 21400 Gender:	Re: The destruction of the AGW science by Murray Salby Reply #60 - Apr 2^nd, 2017 at 3:18pm Ajax wrote on Apr 2^nd, 2017 at 3:12pm: They will create a $7 trillion dollar carbon derivatives market per annum to play their games on. That's how Al Gore made his money. Then got out before the collapse.
Back to top	IP Logged

Bobby.

Moderator

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 121350
Melbourne
Gender: male

Re: The destruction of the AGW science by Murray Salby
Reply #61 - Apr 2^nd, 2017 at 3:33pm

lee wrote on Apr 2^nd, 2017 at 3:18pm:

Ajax wrote on Apr 2^nd, 2017 at 3:12pm:

They will create a $7 trillion dollar carbon derivatives market per annum to play their games on.

That's how Al Gore made his money. Then got out before the collapse.

John Casey - the man featured in the last video - is a scientist.

Why do some people reject science?

Back to top

IP Logged

Ajax

Gold Member

Offline

CO2 has never controlled
temperature on Earth

Posts: 11070
Australia
Gender: male

Re: The destruction of the AGW science by Murray Salby
Reply #62 - Apr 2^nd, 2017 at 3:48pm

lee wrote on Apr 2^nd, 2017 at 3:18pm:

Ajax wrote on Apr 2^nd, 2017 at 3:12pm:

They will create a $7 trillion dollar carbon derivatives market per annum to play their games on.

That's how Al Gore made his money. Then got out before the collapse.

I didn't know he got out.

Smart cookie but what a lying sack of sh!t he is.

Back to top

1. There has never been a more serious assault on our standard of living than Anthropogenic Global Warming..Ajax
2. "One hour of freedom is worth more than 40 years of slavery & prison" Regas Feraeos

IP Logged

lee Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 21400 Gender:	Re: The destruction of the AGW science by Murray Salby Reply #63 - Apr 2^nd, 2017 at 3:50pm Bobby. wrote on Apr 2^nd, 2017 at 3:33pm: John Casey - the man featured in the last video - is a scientist. Why do some people reject science? Because it doesn't jibe with their beliefs. They would rather believe a consensus exists.
Back to top	IP Logged

Ajax

Gold Member

Offline

CO2 has never controlled
temperature on Earth

Posts: 11070
Australia
Gender: male

Re: The destruction of the AGW science by Murray Salby
Reply #64 - Apr 2^nd, 2017 at 3:50pm

Bobby. wrote on Apr 2^nd, 2017 at 3:33pm:

lee wrote on Apr 2^nd, 2017 at 3:18pm:

Ajax wrote on Apr 2^nd, 2017 at 3:12pm:

They will create a $7 trillion dollar carbon derivatives market per annum to play their games on.

That's how Al Gore made his money. Then got out before the collapse.

John Casey - the man featured in the last video - is a scientist.

Why do some people reject science?

Hey Bobby I wouldn't be surprised if 97% of scientists actually disagree with the pseudoscience that is AGW.

Back to top

1. There has never been a more serious assault on our standard of living than Anthropogenic Global Warming..Ajax
2. "One hour of freedom is worth more than 40 years of slavery & prison" Regas Feraeos

IP Logged

Bobby.

Moderator

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 121350
Melbourne
Gender: male

Re: The destruction of the AGW science by Murray Salby
Reply #65 - Apr 2^nd, 2017 at 4:09pm

lee wrote on Apr 2^nd, 2017 at 3:50pm:

Bobby. wrote on Apr 2^nd, 2017 at 3:33pm:

John Casey - the man featured in the last video - is a scientist.

Why do some people reject science?

Because it doesn't jibe with their beliefs. They would rather believe a consensus exists. Wink

I think they are brainwashed by channel 9 news &
they can't think for themselves.
We've got some cold weather coming our way -
so has a great part of the world.

Back to top

IP Logged

Bobby.

Moderator

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 121350
Melbourne
Gender: male

Re: The destruction of the AGW science by Murray Salby
Reply #66 - Apr 2^nd, 2017 at 4:10pm

Ajax wrote on Apr 2^nd, 2017 at 3:50pm:

Bobby. wrote on Apr 2^nd, 2017 at 3:33pm:

lee wrote on Apr 2^nd, 2017 at 3:18pm:

Ajax wrote on Apr 2^nd, 2017 at 3:12pm:

They will create a $7 trillion dollar carbon derivatives market per annum to play their games on.

That's how Al Gore made his money. Then got out before the collapse.

John Casey - the man featured in the last video - is a scientist.

Why do some people reject science?

Hey Bobby I wouldn't be surprised if 97% of scientists actually disagree with the pseudoscience that is AGW.

The scientists are slowly changing their minds.
John Casey used to believe in AGW
but the evidence doesn't correlate with what is observed.

Back to top

IP Logged

The_Barnacle

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 6205
Melbourne
Gender: male

Re: The destruction of the AGW science by Murray Salby
Reply #67 - Apr 9^th, 2017 at 11:52am

Ajax wrote on Apr 2^nd, 2017 at 2:24pm:

Jovial Monk wrote on Apr 2^nd, 2017 at 2:21pm:

Climatologists.

NO.....!

Payed monkeys that wouldn't know the first thing about science, otherwise they wouldn't print such rubbish handed to them by the IPCC.

They cant even get the weather right you expect me to believe their 100 year forecasts.....LOL....... Grin

Ajax, you do know the difference between weather and climate don't you?

So clearly you prefer to believe bloggers, conspiracy theorists and pseudo science rather than actual scientists. You clearly know nothing about science or you wouldn't keep posting those doctored and discredited graphs that you spam us with.

Back to top

The Right Wing only believe in free speech when they agree with what is being said.

IP Logged

Jovial Monk

Gold Member

Offline

Dogs not cats!

Posts: 51474
Gender: male

Re: The destruction of the AGW science by Murray Salby
Reply #68 - Apr 9^th, 2017 at 12:01pm

That very long paper I posted big parts of even explains one of his charts.

Yes, not easy reading and understanding, not as easy as reading that Salby or whatever the jerk’s name is SAYING but not SHOWING why CO2 (etc) does not cause AGW!

I have posted charts showing the infrared spectrum that shows big parts missing corresponding to the GHGs—AGW in action—and still you can’t make deniers see.

Back to top

OzPolitic needs a >real< Environment MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Food MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Health MRB now!
OzPolitic needs a >real< Economics MRB now!

Topics in the right MRB!

IP Logged

lee

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 21400
Gender: male

Re: The destruction of the AGW science by Murray Salby
Reply #69 - Apr 9^th, 2017 at 2:54pm

We have all been told about the IPCC. The IPCC uses peer-reviewed papers only they say.

The IPCC's confidence has grown to 95% that the globe is suffering greater than 50% warming since the mid-twentieth century.

John Cook has done that fabulous report on the peer-reviewed papers.

"(1) Explicitly endorses and quantifies AGW as 50+%"

https://skepticalscience.com/tcp.php?t=search&s=a&a=&c=&e=1&yf=1991&yt=2011

That is 65 papers out of 4011 or 1.6%, according to John Cook et al.

Just imagine how confident they would be if it got to 3% of the papers.

Back to top

IP Logged