So, a bit of a spectrum of opinion.

Try and justify your vote, that will be more interesting than your vote.

You have five minutes to change your vote.

your poll sucks..

we are not in a little ice age...

we are entering one...

but basically... historically...

our climate is as was 100 years ago...

Your videos are worthless crap.

Not changing it, in/entering a little ice age now is preposterous, you believe that silly rubbish vote for the ice age option.

Parts of the world that get 6 months of no sun you expect to be cold (tho warming up) so I don’t think much of that argument.

This, to Booby, is a sign we are in or entering a Little Ice Age:



Nobody sensible and sane surely supports a LIA hypothesis? Crazy!

Just vote, codsy.

What is your vote, Lees?

Why not? Why pathetic?

Frank wrote on Mar 31^st, 2017 at 10:19pm:


And how do you explain then the increase in temperature which the world is currently experiencing, Soren?   I'm surprised that a Trick Cyclist would even understand Climatology.  I know I only understand it partially and that is because I have a ex-Brother-in-law who is a Climatologist. 

Quote:


Really?  So, the use of Fossil Fuels is completely "natural", is it, Soren?  I wasn't aware of any other animal in our biosphere who had mastered the ability to extract Fossil Fuels, refine them (where necessary) and create the machines to burn them.   Have I missed some new discovery?   

Quote:


Oh, dear, Homophobia as well, Soren?  Tsk, tsk.  The only person who seems to have a problem with those that don't think like him, is yourself.  Must make life hell to be one of your patients.   

It is not possible to reason with people who say there has been no effect from the amount of crap pumped into the sky over last 200 years.

And what's up with all these unnecessary imports that require shipping to pollute the sky? Heinz Ketchup from the Netherlands? Vegetables from South America? And I don't want out of season fruit that has to be trucked across the country.

Three times as many warning as non–warming votes so far. Good to see rationality rules!

Yup, and denialism is fuelled by FEAR!

The sun is actually quiescent and has been since the 1980s. It is a minor negative forcing for global temperature yet STILL the globe is warming!

Poor Lees! FOUR times as many people know the world is heating as irrational people think it isn’t. Better vote you scaredy cat you!

Bobby. wrote on Apr 1^st, 2017 at 6:13pm:


Oh Booby Booby! Minimum ice around BOTH poles, glaciers in retreat and you think you can judge those following the science of climatology? No way buddy! Nobody but the brainless or insane believe your crap about a LIA!

The very thought of AGW just petrifies you with fear, doesn’t it Lees?

Such an expert is Booby!

Nope, I face up to the problems AGW will bring, you refuse to face them. Just a snivelling coward is Lees.

Jovial Monk wrote on Apr 1^st, 2017 at 7:52pm:


Doth ye denieth that:

The interglacial period now - is unusual.
It normally lasts for 10,000 years followed by 100,000 years of ice.


Do you know what that means?

There is no way that the Earth will have a carrying capacity
of 7 billion people if a real ice Age starts again.
One of my videos was from scientists in the Antarctic -
they have proof that a previous full Ice Age started in a matter of only 3 years.
Such an Ice Age would be catastrophic for mankind.
Almost the whole world's population would be wiped out.

Given that we are already 12,000 years into an interglacial warm period
& that such periods last normally 10,000 years -
we are well overdue for a full Ice Age.
I just hope I die before it happens.
It may not happen tomorrow or in the next 100 years or 500 years - but it will happen.

Jovial Monk wrote on Apr 1^st, 2017 at 8:22pm:



Greenland has gained ice this last winter.
Antarctica has gained ice too.
Check it out.
Find the facts.
Don't live in your own matrix - or thought bubble.

Jovial Monk wrote on Apr 1^st, 2017 at 8:22pm:



And it has never happened before, be afraid, be very afraid.

Further:

Quote:


Now, you can look at crap videos or you can read what actual scientists, not oil seed salesmen, scientists have to say about changes to the climate.

lee wrote on Apr 1^st, 2017 at 9:41pm:




NOAA & NASA have lied to the whole world.

The truth will all be revealed thanks to Donald Trump.

Then I expect a lot of grovelling apologies.

Is this the same NOAA that has1997 warmer than 2016?

This Topic was moved here from General Board by Setanta.

Jovial Monk wrote on Apr 1^st, 2017 at 10:25pm:



So you believe in consensus and polling.

And here you are telling people you believe in the science. The proof of science is the observations. Although of course global temperatures are not observations. Do they therefore count as science?

Jovial Monk wrote on Apr 2^nd, 2017 at 11:13am:


How many times have you voted?

And we know polls are proof positive of something being true. /sarc

Jovial Monk wrote on Apr 2^nd, 2017 at 11:42am:


So sad that you didn't realise it earlier.

Jovial Monk wrote on Apr 2^nd, 2017 at 11:53am:


Please enumerate your converts.

Poll is 10:2 that warming is happening.

All that time obfuscating, Lees, and all wasted.

.

Jovial Monk wrote on Apr 9^th, 2017 at 3:37pm:



The poll only proves that most people have been successfully brainwashed.

Bobby. wrote on Apr 11^th, 2017 at 6:18pm:


You would know all about being brainwashed, Sir Louse! Voluntarily let your brain be washed by an oil seed broker looking to make some easy bucks talking crap. I know it is brainwashing because you cannot really discuss the LIA rubbish and you can’t refute any critique of it.

A fox fell through the ice and was flash frozen? Really? Ice so thin it could not even support the weight of a fox and it was flash frozen? Total garbage fit to feed to idiots, right Sir Louse?

A lake in Melbourne turned pink. Ooohhhhhhh REEL PRUFE of an ice age, right Sir Louse?

Crap fit for idiots. Are you an idiot as well as rude bugger, Sir Louse?

Jovial Monk wrote on Apr 12^th, 2017 at 7:47am:


So Sir Louse, you prize Booby, care to show you are not brainwashed? Can you explain how a small animal like a fox can fall through very thin ice and then be “flash” frozen? Well, can you?

And can your Brainwashedness explain how a Melbourn lake turning pink “proves” we are in a LIA?

Since 2016 was the hottest year recorded, how are we in or entering an Ice Age?

Come on you brainwashed Booby, show you can still T H I N K !

Sir Booby de Louse ran away.

Brave Sir Booby ran away, away

No I didn’t! Urgent business to take care of!

Jovial Monk wrote on Apr 12^th, 2017 at 7:47am:

So Sir Louse de Booby, your comment now you are back?

You said it yourself earlier Booby.  This period of warming is unusual.
Normally 10,000 yrs , but here we are, according to you at 12,000 yrs.

So, the current warming trend has already exceeded normality (according to you).
By 2000 years.

Golly gosh, I wonder what is different this time. Hmm?
What could it be?

u r telling the 'story'.
Booby said it was unusual. So, you disagree then.?

not my problem darlink. As I said you're the one telling the story.

"Who could possibly have been measuring Global Mean Temperature (GMT) so accurately (±0.14°C) in 1880?"

"As one would expect, reliable data sets from the late 19th are sparse.

"How then to calculate GMT from such sparse data, which happens to be concentrated in North America and Europe?  Well the solution is not to calculate GMT from contemporary 1880 data but to reconstruct GMT by identifying correlations among modern geographic temperature data distributions and then projecting these same correlations backward onto the support of the relatively sparse empirical data available in earlier times."

"Thus, "climate change" alarmism is based on two mathematical models: 1) a statistical model that "reconstructs" historical data using modern correlations projected backward for 100 years onto the thin support of sparse empirical data sets available then; and 2) a "climate model" that uses this very same reconstructed historical data as key input data to project climate forward for the next 100 years."

http://www.americanthinker.com/2007/09/one_more_reason_to_distrust_gl.html#ixzz4...

So that "data" from 1880 isn't data but a fabrication.

lee wrote on Apr 13^th, 2017 at 11:14am:



Hi lee,
Yes - so we are right at the end of the interglacial period.
The scary part is that a full ice age can hit in only 3 years.
Scientists in the Antarctic have evidence of that from ice drilling cores.

I posted the evidence once on the mini ice age thread.

Oh, No. it is that little "look at me" fellow again.

The one who has never heard of the 60-70's global cooling scare.

lee wrote on Apr 18^th, 2017 at 10:37am:


Have heard of it now else I could not have mentioned it. Really, Liar Lees, do apply some elementary logic to your babblings.

YAWN. Oh how tiresome is this?

ALMOST enough to send me to sleep. ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.