Sprintcyclist wrote on Mar 25^th, 2017 at 5:30pm:


Sprinty.

Nice to see you've gotten off the couch, put away the tissue box (after watching women's football), and have decided to contribute.

I hear what you're saying, however, are you really suggesting that doctors, Uni students, and people with good jobs are exempt from mental illness?

Raven wrote on Mar 25^th, 2017 at 5:38pm:


Sorry Raven but you're wrong.
I could recommend a bunch of reading on this but illness point you towards maajid nawaz, a reformed Islamist and champion of an Islamic reformation,  who explains very clearly that the tales of an afterlife and it's rewards are overemphasised in Islam and give too much compulsion to martyr.

You and I think someone must be crazy to be a suicide bomber. They are sane and rational.

mothra wrote on Mar 25^th, 2017 at 5:35pm:


I will answer your question, but you must promise to answer mine

I take no delight in the death of this piece of human trash, better he had lived and seen the suffering and pain he has caused.
Better that he come to realise that his actions caused so much pain and hopefully he would feel some remorse.
No I take no pleasure in his death, but yes I do believe in sending a message.
These barbarians are superstitious and woukd possibly balk at they themselves being buried with a pigs carcass, it is in fact meant to insult the terrorists.
The individuals carcass is nothing but a collection of meat and chemicals, the soul has left the building.
The pigs carcass is to prevent the same happening again.
Much the same as a fine prevents recurrence,  sort of.

Now answer my question
As we have established, only mentaly il people become terrorists.
Therefore, if you folow the established thread, ANYONE who celebrates, rejoices, is part of or condones the act of terrorism or tge terrorist must also, by logic, also be mentally ill.

Is this not so?

YES OR NO

Valkie has demonstrated his own mental instability, and by his own criteria has labeled himself a risk to society if somebody gifts Valkie some balls.

Valkie wrote on Mar 25^th, 2017 at 6:35pm:


YES

We have established something here.

We have established that terrorists are mentally ill and dangerious.
We have also established that anyone who praises, condones or otherwise, through action or inaction, promotes the act as an example to be follows is also mentally ill and dangerious.

Now we look at recent terrorist acts, many of the muslim community, as a collective praises, celebrates and extoles the virtues of this act, they take pleasure in the death of inocent people.
Not all granted, but a sizable percentage go on the web and cheer, praise and otherwise rejioce in terrorism.

When an entity has a sizable percentage of its members mentally ill (AS WE HAVE ESTABLISHED) the entity as a whole must be considered contaminated or at least suspect and definitely dangerious.

By further extrapolation, and Im being quite firm here, we have the apologists who themselves by way of apologising, diverting attention away from trivializing or making the action less than a barbaric act are in fact part of the problem and quite possibly mentally ill as well.

There you have it
Eastblished
Terrorists are mentally ill
People who praise, condone, protect, apologise or otherwise promote terrorism are mentally ill.

Finally
The muslim religion, or a very large and sangerious percentage of it, are in fact, mentally ill and dangerious.
How do we tell the difference between mentally ill muslims and sane muslims?
We cant and therein lies the problem.

Therefore ALL MUSLIMS MUST BE SUSPECTED MENTALLY ILL AND DANGERIOUS.

Try as you might
You have admitted that terrorists are  mentaly ill, it matters not if they be muslim or other.
You have admitted that anyone who praises, condones or otherwise seeks to promote terrorism is also mentally ill.

Now.
Of all the other non muslim acts of teror which group, organisation or entity is to blame?
Is it an established and well knkw group?
Does this group praise, condone or promote terrorism?

Now
A large proportion of muslims DO in fact praise, promote and condone terorism.
Making the CULT mentally ill or at least heavily populated by mentally ill persons.

What part of this dont you get?

Oh yhats right
You lot are apologist sympathisers
Panic mode
Divert, change the subject and insult

I care not
I have proved my point and you have helped.
I know it hurts, but ?...........hel who cares.