mothra wrote on Mar 23^rd, 2017 at 9:35am:


I really didn't know that. I thought a few were given some scrapes and bumps on the bridge, but that's all.

So okay, where do we go from here?

He was a known hate-preacher swanning around London on no doubt a Disability Support Pension or the dole, and with millions of British pounds per annum budgeted off the British tax-payer to finance anti-terrorist agencies to keep an eye on these Muslims on their Watch Lists.

The lesson is: If you can't trust certain individuals, then deport them back to their country of origin without court appeals, red tape, or UN and EU prohibitions.

cods wrote on Mar 23^rd, 2017 at 9:40am:



well, lets look at the guys in free divers picture carrying the signs , inciting destruction of democracy....they are the weeds.

now if a weed is declaring itself a weed by weedlike behaviour, then why would other members of society tolerate its presence?

the problem is that a lot of young impressionable plants might look at the weed , and see that the weed is very hateful , very angry, very destructive.

now if a young impressionable plant is going thru a rough patch , it might want to vibe with that sort of emotional state and it might be drawn to becoming a weed.

emotional states are addictive and we need to recognise this.

if you allow people to be openly hateful , destructive, insolent and disobedient...then people in those impressionable states will be drawn to those people.

the only way to stop the carnage is to pluck the weeds aggressively and keep on plucking til they are all gone.

sure you might get a few prickles in your fingers , but its better then watching your whole paddock succumb to an infestation

aquascoot wrote on Mar 23^rd, 2017 at 10:07am:



no dear you have that all wrong..

what the guy in th pic is doping ios

FREEDOM OF SPEECH...

just because you disagree with what he says...doesnt make him wrong... we can of course legislate law to prevent his form of FOS....but we cant kill him or pluck him as you say....if we did that we would be coming down to their level....they kill all who disagree with them all are weeds as far as they are concerned.. you surely so not condone that do you?....

capitosinora wrote on Mar 23^rd, 2017 at 9:53am:


You're an arsehole. Was 9/11 just yank exaggeration fvkwit.........5 people are dead and many seriously injured, and the British police don't fvking shoot drunk drivers......idiot!

Panther wrote on Mar 23^rd, 2017 at 12:12pm:




If you visit JihadWatch, AtlasShrugs or any of the too numerous to count anti-Muslim hate sites and blogs, you are likely to find on the sidebar a hyperlinked image claiming that “Islamic Terrorists have carried out more than _____ Deadly Terror Attacks Since 9/11.” The image was created by the anti-Islam hate site, The Religion of Peace (TROP), associated with Islamophobe Daniel Greenfield, aka “SultanKnish,” who you will recall earns a pretty penny from the David Horowitz Freedom Center.

The clear visual intent of this “Islamic terrorism ticker” is to provoke an emotive fear and anxiety of a global, monolithic, totalitarian Islam (read: Muslims), that is waging terror everywhere through thousands upon thousands of unmitigated and random attacks. On TROP the “terror ticker” serves as ammunition for the site’s stated missionary proposition of portraying “Islam” as “the world’s worst religion.” It also aids in the attempt to tie terrorism to Islam.

Even a cursory glance at TROP’s list of so-called “Islamic terrorist attacks” reveals it to be nothing more than a deeply biased, propagandistic spin-job that conflates:  real terrorist attacks, (semi)religious/culturally motivated crimes, attacks on military personnel and attacks by secular groups with no ideological basis in Islam — all in theaters of occupation, civil war and separatist conflict.

Sheila Musaji comments on this aspect of TROP’s list, writing,

This site lists acts committed around the world – some in wars, some having nothing to do with Islam, but to do with nationalist or political struggles, some in civil wars. No links are given. No sources for any of this just a list of supposed attacks carried out by “Islamic terrorists”.

Musaji’s complaint about their lack of links or citations to attacks holds true, however, one can generally glean where they grab their information. Some of it is likely from verifiable news sources while other sources are Right-Wing Christian/Zionist sites and news aggregators such as World Net Daily, BosNewsLife and Arutz Sheva.

TROP also reports many incidents of attacks as the work of Islamist/terrorist groups when no group has taken responsibility or when law enforcement is unsure of the culprit. They omit facts, decontextualize, leaving out the fact that most of these attacks are part of larger insurgencies against the state. They also just plain lie about some attacks.

http://www.loonwatch.com/2012/07/thereligionofpeace-com-working-to-streamline-th...

Fuzzball wrote on Mar 23^rd, 2017 at 11:30am:



capitosinora was presenting the humanist progressives' side, not his

mothra wrote on Mar 23^rd, 2017 at 12:19pm:

Panther wrote on Mar 23^rd, 2017 at 12:25pm: