Australian Politics Forum

Melanias purse

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 101219

Re: Cocks
Reply #15 - Mar 13^th, 2017 at 4:51pm

Gordon wrote on Mar 13^th, 2017 at 4:46pm:

Melanias purse wrote on Mar 13^th, 2017 at 4:42pm:

Gordon wrote on Mar 12^th, 2017 at 5:45pm:

Melanias purse wrote on Mar 12^th, 2017 at 5:34pm:

Gordon wrote on Mar 12^th, 2017 at 12:35pm:

Melanias purse wrote on Mar 11^th, 2017 at 2:57pm:

Gordon wrote on Mar 10^th, 2017 at 12:12pm:

parents of children U18 who've been subjected to FGM would be ineligible for immigration to any western country.

That would provide a disincentive to the practice.

Good idea, Gordon. This would require every girl entering Australia to have their clits checked.

But I'm curious - should we do the same for boys?

You should be okay. You're intact.

Firstly Karnal, this thread is about female genitalia. If you're so desperate to talk about penises then start your own thread.

As for checking clits, make it very well known that cutting or FGM or whatever you prefer to call it of girls under age 18 makes immigration to the west ineligible for parents.

What a great incentive not to do it!!!

As for checking, they'd simply bring a doctors certificate to the stage one interview and another check could be done during the mandatory health checks.

Can you fault this?

Me? No.

Descriminatiom laws would fault it. You'd be banning all girls from entry to "the West" because they don't have clits - totally illegal under a number of acts and treaties.

Why do you want to exhempt boys from the legislation? I'm curious.

You'd be okay. You're intact, remember.

Start a thread about cocks and ask there.

Don't want to say, eh?

I said. You ignored.

I'm not a proponent of male circumcision but clearly it doesn't cause the health issues and sexual dysfunction of FGM.

Hope this helps.

I see nothing in this thread on the legal implications of banning the parents of girls with clitorectomies. I see nothing in this thread about levelling the score to comply with anti-discrimination legislation.

I also see nothing about your point on health issues and sexual dysfunction, so I'm curious.

What percentage of girls are killed by FGM? What studies have been done on vaginal sensitivity? What studies have been done on the health benefits of surgically removing the clitoral hood?

To summarize, what evidence do you have for your argument?

Back to top

IP Logged

Melanias purse

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 101219

Re: Cocks
Reply #16 - Mar 13^th, 2017 at 4:53pm

cods wrote on Mar 13^th, 2017 at 4:48pm:

Gordon wrote on Mar 13^th, 2017 at 1:54pm:

I have very little interest on the subject but I notice you've mentioned penises and circumcision 100s of times in various threads.

One question for you.

Does male circumcision cause the same level of medical problems or sexual dysfunction as does FGM?

about says it all...

karnal seems to find the habit amusing..and worthy of mocking.

Now now, dear, we're discussing the science here and the legal implications thereof.

There is nothing in this thread to be amused about.

Back to top

IP Logged

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 89929 Proud Old White Australian Man Gender:	Re: Cocks Reply #17 - Mar 13^th, 2017 at 6:01pm I used to know a lass named Lorraine Cocks..... spelt that way too...
Back to top	“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.” ― John Adams IP Logged

Gnads

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 33108
Gender: male

Re: Cocks
Reply #18 - Mar 13^th, 2017 at 7:31pm

Unforgiven wrote on Mar 13^th, 2017 at 4:07pm:

Gordon wrote on Mar 13^th, 2017 at 1:54pm:

I have very little interest on the subject but I notice you've mentioned penises and circumcision 100s of times in various threads.

One question for you.

Does male circumcision cause the same level of medical problems or sexual dysfunction as does FGM?

Yes. It has caused death and disfigurement.

In radical ISLAMIC/tribal society in the middle east

not in the west

have another go

& cease trivializing FGM or FGC or what ever you s0ftc0ck word players want to call the vast removal of female genitalia with BS about male circumcision.

Back to top

"When you are dead, you do not know you are dead. It's only painful and difficult for others. The same applies when you are stupid." ~ Ricky Gervais

IP Logged

Melanias purse

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 101219

Re: Cocks
Reply #19 - Mar 13^th, 2017 at 7:41pm

Gnads wrote on Mar 13^th, 2017 at 7:31pm:

Unforgiven wrote on Mar 13^th, 2017 at 4:07pm:

Gordon wrote on Mar 13^th, 2017 at 1:54pm:

I have very little interest on the subject but I notice you've mentioned penises and circumcision 100s of times in various threads.

One question for you.

Does male circumcision cause the same level of medical problems or sexual dysfunction as does FGM?

Yes. It has caused death and disfigurement.

In radical ISLAMIC/tribal society in the middle east

not in the west

have another go

& cease trivializing FGM or FGC or what ever you s0ftc0ck word players want to call the vast removal of female genitalia with BS about male circumcision.

We've got another advocate here, Gordon. Hands sounds intact as well.

Back to top

IP Logged

Raven

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2982
Around

Re: Cocks
Reply #20 - Mar 16^th, 2017 at 1:38am

Genital mutilation in any form is wrong.

It is an evil practice, male or female. There is something wrong with society that we can accept it in any form, all because an invisible entity is pleased by it.

Quote:

Exodus 4:24-26

One day god showed up to kill his buddy Moses. His wife Zipporah mutilated her son's penis and rubbed it on Moses' feet.

This act of genital mutilation pleased that sick pervert god so much he decided not to kill Moses.

Raven would have like to quote the Qur'an regarding circumcision but it is not mentioned. Though Muslims do it because Muhammed said:

Quote:

Follow the religion of Ibrahim, the upright in Faith

Qur'an 16:123.

It is a disgusting practice be it on male or female. And accepting one over the other is being complicit in that evil.

Back to top

Quoth the Raven "Nevermore"

Raven would rather ask questions that may never be answered, then accept answers which must never be questioned.

IP Logged

Raven

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2982
Around

Re: Cocks
Reply #21 - Mar 16^th, 2017 at 1:48am

Gnads wrote on Mar 13^th, 2017 at 7:31pm:

Unforgiven wrote on Mar 13^th, 2017 at 4:07pm:

Gordon wrote on Mar 13^th, 2017 at 1:54pm:

I have very little interest on the subject but I notice you've mentioned penises and circumcision 100s of times in various threads.

One question for you.

Does male circumcision cause the same level of medical problems or sexual dysfunction as does FGM?

Yes. It has caused death and disfigurement.

In radical ISLAMIC/tribal society in the middle east

not in the west

have another go

& cease trivializing FGM or FGC or what ever you s0ftc0ck word players want to call the vast removal of female genitalia with BS about male circumcision.

Around 117 deaths occur in the US alone from circumcision.

Not only that but there is a growing number of neonatal herpes in the western world due to the practice of Metzitzah B'Peh, where the Mohel sucks the infant penis.

What more evidence do you need that this is wrong? A grown man sucking a baby's penis is fine because "god"

If a doctor did it he'd be in gaol.

It's time to outlaw this practice.

Back to top

Quoth the Raven "Nevermore"

Raven would rather ask questions that may never be answered, then accept answers which must never be questioned.

IP Logged

Gordon

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 21729
Gordon
Gender: male

Re: Cocks
Reply #22 - Mar 16^th, 2017 at 7:22am

Raven wrote on Mar 16^th, 2017 at 1:48am:

Gnads wrote on Mar 13^th, 2017 at 7:31pm:

Unforgiven wrote on Mar 13^th, 2017 at 4:07pm:

Gordon wrote on Mar 13^th, 2017 at 1:54pm:

I have very little interest on the subject but I notice you've mentioned penises and circumcision 100s of times in various threads.

One question for you.

Does male circumcision cause the same level of medical problems or sexual dysfunction as does FGM?

Yes. It has caused death and disfigurement.

In radical ISLAMIC/tribal society in the middle east

not in the west

have another go

& cease trivializing FGM or FGC or what ever you s0ftc0ck word players want to call the vast removal of female genitalia with BS about male circumcision.

Around 117 deaths occur in the US alone from circumcision.

Not only that but there is a growing number of neonatal herpes in the western world due to the practice of Metzitzah B'Peh, where the Mohel sucks the infant penis.

What more evidence do you need that this is wrong? A grown man sucking a baby's penis is fine because "god"

If a doctor did it he'd be in gaol.

It's time to outlaw this practice.

Raven, have you succumbed to Karnals pro FGM BS ?

Islam and male circumcision

Muslims are still the largest single religious group to circumcise boys. In Islam circumcision is also known as tahara, meaning purification.

Circumcision is not mentioned in the Qur'an but it is highlighted in the Sunnah (the Prophet Muhammad's recorded words and actions). In the Sunnah, Muhammad stated that circumcision was a "law for men."

The main reason given for the ritual is cleanliness. It is essential that every Muslim washes before praying. It is important that no urine is left on the body.

Muslims believe the removal of the foreksin makes it easier to keep the penis clean because urine can't get trapped there.

Supporters of circumcision also argue that excrements may collect under the foreskin which may lead to fatal diseases such as cancer.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/religion/religions/islam/islamethics/malecircumcision.shtml

Back to top

IBI

IP Logged

Gordon Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 21729 Gordon Gender:	Re: Cocks Reply #23 - Mar 16^th, 2017 at 7:26am Gordy thinks male circumcision is unnecessary yet nowhere near as damaging as FGM, does Raven agree?
Back to top	3-types-of-fgm1.jpg (13 KB \| 27 ) IBI IP Logged

Lord Herbert

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 34441
Gender: male

Re: Cocks
Reply #24 - Mar 16^th, 2017 at 7:28am

Aussie wrote on Mar 13^th, 2017 at 2:19pm:

I agree Karnal. I have never been the same person since they cut off half me dick when I was three. (???).......days.

I'm still sporting a turtle-neck sweater 'down there', but I'm toying with the idea of having it removed and tossing it into the chicken run here for Henny Penny and Henrietta to squabble over.

Back to top

IP Logged

cods

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 88048

Re: Cocks
Reply #25 - Mar 16^th, 2017 at 8:12am

Gordon wrote on Mar 13^th, 2017 at 4:12pm:

Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 13^th, 2017 at 4:11pm:

Aussie wrote on Mar 13^th, 2017 at 2:19pm:

Melanias purse wrote on Mar 13^th, 2017 at 1:40pm:

Gordon is a campaigner for genital integrity. He stands against genital mutilation, and would like to see all girls immigrating to the West checked for evidence of clitorectomies.

If this evidence is found, Gordon would like to ban the girl's parents from immigration. Presumably, this would require that the victim is rejected also - unless they are taken into the care of the state as unaccompanied minors.

But I'm curious. To insure against a charge of discrimination, should boys be checked as well? What are the legal consequences of this? Should those with medical circumcisions be permitted, but tribal circumcisions banned?

Discuss.

I agree Karnal.

I have never been the same person since they cut off half me dick when I was three. (???).......days.

Oh dear.....I can see a new signature appearing on OzPol. Grin

Seems the best bit of him was chucked in the bin that day. YUCK!

come on gordy be fair..

Back to top

IP Logged

Raven

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 2982
Around

Re: Cocks
Reply #26 - Mar 16^th, 2017 at 10:17am

Gordon wrote on Mar 16^th, 2017 at 7:22am:

Raven wrote on Mar 16^th, 2017 at 1:48am:

Gnads wrote on Mar 13^th, 2017 at 7:31pm:

Unforgiven wrote on Mar 13^th, 2017 at 4:07pm:

Gordon wrote on Mar 13^th, 2017 at 1:54pm:

I have very little interest on the subject but I notice you've mentioned penises and circumcision 100s of times in various threads.

One question for you.

Does male circumcision cause the same level of medical problems or sexual dysfunction as does FGM?

Yes. It has caused death and disfigurement.

In radical ISLAMIC/tribal society in the middle east

not in the west

have another go

& cease trivializing FGM or FGC or what ever you s0ftc0ck word players want to call the vast removal of female genitalia with BS about male circumcision.

Around 117 deaths occur in the US alone from circumcision.

Not only that but there is a growing number of neonatal herpes in the western world due to the practice of Metzitzah B'Peh, where the Mohel sucks the infant penis.

What more evidence do you need that this is wrong? A grown man sucking a baby's penis is fine because "god"

If a doctor did it he'd be in gaol.

It's time to outlaw this practice.

Raven, have you succumbed to Karnals pro FGM BS ?

No, genital mutilation is wrong, male or female.

Are you pro MGM?

Back to top

Quoth the Raven "Nevermore"

Raven would rather ask questions that may never be answered, then accept answers which must never be questioned.

IP Logged

Melanias purse Gold Member Online Australian Politics Posts: 101219	Re: Cocks Reply #27 - Mar 16^th, 2017 at 12:18pm Raven wrote on Mar 16^th, 2017 at 10:17am: No, genital mutilation is wrong, male or female. Are you pro MGM? You'll need to ask me Gordon's views, Raven. See the attached link for a guide: http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1489623998
Back to top	IP Logged

Mr Hammer Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 25212 Gender:	Re: Cocks Reply #28 - Mar 16^th, 2017 at 4:12pm Dirty ole Paki housewife.
Back to top	IP Logged