Australian Politics Forum

Melanias purse

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 101221

Cocks
Mar 13^th, 2017 at 1:40pm

Gordon is a campaigner for genital integrity. He stands against genital mutilation, and would like to see all girls immigrating to the West checked for evidence of clitorectomies.

If this evidence is found, Gordon would like to ban the girl's parents from immigration. Presumably, this would require that the victim is rejected also - unless they are taken into the care of the state as unaccompanied minors.

But I'm curious. To insure against a charge of discrimination, should boys be checked as well? What are the legal consequences of this? Should those with medical circumcisions be permitted, but tribal circumcisions banned?

Discuss.

Back to top

IP Logged

Lisa Jones

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 39047
Sydney
Gender: female

Re: Cocks
Reply #1 - Mar 13^th, 2017 at 1:43pm

Melanias purse wrote on Mar 13^th, 2017 at 1:40pm:

Gordon is a campaigner for genital integrity. He stands against genital mutilation, and would like to see all girls immigrating to the West checked for evidence of clitorectomies.

If this evidence is found, Gordon would like to ban the girl's parents from immigration. Presumably, this would require that the victim is rejected also - unless they are taken into the care of the state as unaccompanied minors.

But I'm curious. To insure against a charge of discrimination, should boys be checked as well? What are the legal consequences of this? Should those with medical circumcisions be permitted, but tribal circumcisions banned?

Discuss.

1. You're a dick!

2. This topic should be called "Vaginas"!

Tongue

Back to top

If I let myself be bought then I am no longer free.

HYPATIA - Greek philosopher, mathematician and astronomer (370 - 415)

IP Logged

Rider Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 2669 OnTheRoad Gender:	Re: Cocks Reply #2 - Mar 13^th, 2017 at 1:52pm If you are so thick you don't know the difference between female mutilation and male circumcision then you truly are operating on a single brain cell. Grow up. Stop posting shite. Stop attempting to legitimose a horrific dark age practice which has the whole purpose of forcing control over a female.
Back to top	IP Logged

Gordon Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 21729 Gordon Gender:	Re: Cocks Reply #3 - Mar 13^th, 2017 at 1:54pm I have very little interest on the subject but I notice you've mentioned penises and circumcision 100s of times in various threads. One question for you. Does male circumcision cause the same level of medical problems or sexual dysfunction as does FGM?
Back to top	IBI IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 39710
Gender: male

Re: Cocks
Reply #4 - Mar 13^th, 2017 at 2:19pm

Melanias purse wrote on Mar 13^th, 2017 at 1:40pm:

Gordon is a campaigner for genital integrity. He stands against genital mutilation, and would like to see all girls immigrating to the West checked for evidence of clitorectomies.

If this evidence is found, Gordon would like to ban the girl's parents from immigration. Presumably, this would require that the victim is rejected also - unless they are taken into the care of the state as unaccompanied minors.

But I'm curious. To insure against a charge of discrimination, should boys be checked as well? What are the legal consequences of this? Should those with medical circumcisions be permitted, but tribal circumcisions banned?

Discuss.

I agree Karnal. I have never been the same person since they cut off half me dick when I was three. (???).......days.

Back to top

IP Logged

Redmond Neck

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 23031
ACT
Gender: male

Re: Cocks
Reply #5 - Mar 13^th, 2017 at 2:26pm

Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 13^th, 2017 at 1:43pm:

Melanias purse wrote on Mar 13^th, 2017 at 1:40pm:

Gordon is a campaigner for genital integrity. He stands against genital mutilation, and would like to see all girls immigrating to the West checked for evidence of clitorectomies.

If this evidence is found, Gordon would like to ban the girl's parents from immigration. Presumably, this would require that the victim is rejected also - unless they are taken into the care of the state as unaccompanied minors.

But I'm curious. To insure against a charge of discrimination, should boys be checked as well? What are the legal consequences of this? Should those with medical circumcisions be permitted, but tribal circumcisions banned?

Discuss.

1. You're a dick!

2. This topic should be called "Vaginas"!

Tongue

Lots of d1cks in here Lisa!

Lopped or not! Grin

Back to top

BAN ALL THESE ABO SITES RECOGNITIONS.

ALL AUSTRALIA IS FOR ALL AUSTRALIANS!

IP Logged

Gordon Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 21729 Gordon Gender:	Re: Cocks Reply #6 - Mar 13^th, 2017 at 3:15pm Mortha, do you have an opinion on this? I wouldn't circumcise a boy but on the basis of ongoing health issues and the sexual dysfunction caused by FGM, they're not even if the same ballpark. Are we in agreement on this one?
Back to top	IBI IP Logged

Unforgiven Gold Member Offline I have sinned Posts: 8879 Gender:	Re: Cocks Reply #7 - Mar 13^th, 2017 at 4:07pm Gordon wrote on Mar 13^th, 2017 at 1:54pm: I have very little interest on the subject but I notice you've mentioned penises and circumcision 100s of times in various threads. One question for you. Does male circumcision cause the same level of medical problems or sexual dysfunction as does FGM? Yes. It has caused death and disfigurement.
Back to top	“I’ll let you be in my dreams if I can be in yours” Bob Dylan IP Logged

Unforgiven Gold Member Offline I have sinned Posts: 8879 Gender:	Re: Cocks Reply #8 - Mar 13^th, 2017 at 4:08pm Gordon wrote on Mar 13^th, 2017 at 3:15pm: Mortha, do you have an opinion on this? I wouldn't circumcise a boy but on the basis of ongoing health issues and the sexual dysfunction caused by FGM, they're not even if the same ballpark. Are we in agreement on this one? If you wouldn't circumcise a boy, why are you trivializing circumcision?
Back to top	“I’ll let you be in my dreams if I can be in yours” Bob Dylan IP Logged

Lisa Jones

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 39047
Sydney
Gender: female

Re: Cocks
Reply #9 - Mar 13^th, 2017 at 4:11pm

Aussie wrote on Mar 13^th, 2017 at 2:19pm:

Melanias purse wrote on Mar 13^th, 2017 at 1:40pm:

Gordon is a campaigner for genital integrity. He stands against genital mutilation, and would like to see all girls immigrating to the West checked for evidence of clitorectomies.

If this evidence is found, Gordon would like to ban the girl's parents from immigration. Presumably, this would require that the victim is rejected also - unless they are taken into the care of the state as unaccompanied minors.

But I'm curious. To insure against a charge of discrimination, should boys be checked as well? What are the legal consequences of this? Should those with medical circumcisions be permitted, but tribal circumcisions banned?

Discuss.

I agree Karnal.

I have never been the same person since they cut off half me dick when I was three. (???).......days.

Oh dear.....I can see a new signature appearing on OzPol. Grin

Back to top

If I let myself be bought then I am no longer free.

HYPATIA - Greek philosopher, mathematician and astronomer (370 - 415)

IP Logged

Gordon

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 21729
Gordon
Gender: male

Re: Cocks
Reply #10 - Mar 13^th, 2017 at 4:12pm

Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 13^th, 2017 at 4:11pm:

Aussie wrote on Mar 13^th, 2017 at 2:19pm:

Melanias purse wrote on Mar 13^th, 2017 at 1:40pm:

Gordon is a campaigner for genital integrity. He stands against genital mutilation, and would like to see all girls immigrating to the West checked for evidence of clitorectomies.

If this evidence is found, Gordon would like to ban the girl's parents from immigration. Presumably, this would require that the victim is rejected also - unless they are taken into the care of the state as unaccompanied minors.

But I'm curious. To insure against a charge of discrimination, should boys be checked as well? What are the legal consequences of this? Should those with medical circumcisions be permitted, but tribal circumcisions banned?

Discuss.

I agree Karnal.

I have never been the same person since they cut off half me dick when I was three. (???).......days.

Oh dear.....I can see a new signature appearing on OzPol. Grin

Seems the best bit of him was chucked in the bin that day. YUCK!

Back to top

IBI

IP Logged

Melanias purse

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 101221

Re: Cocks
Reply #11 - Mar 13^th, 2017 at 4:42pm

Gordon wrote on Mar 12^th, 2017 at 5:45pm:

Melanias purse wrote on Mar 12^th, 2017 at 5:34pm:

Gordon wrote on Mar 12^th, 2017 at 12:35pm:

Melanias purse wrote on Mar 11^th, 2017 at 2:57pm:

Gordon wrote on Mar 10^th, 2017 at 12:12pm:

parents of children U18 who've been subjected to FGM would be ineligible for immigration to any western country.

That would provide a disincentive to the practice.

Good idea, Gordon. This would require every girl entering Australia to have their clits checked.

But I'm curious - should we do the same for boys?

You should be okay. You're intact.

Firstly Karnal, this thread is about female genitalia. If you're so desperate to talk about penises then start your own thread.

As for checking clits, make it very well known that cutting or FGM or whatever you prefer to call it of girls under age 18 makes immigration to the west ineligible for parents.

What a great incentive not to do it!!!

As for checking, they'd simply bring a doctors certificate to the stage one interview and another check could be done during the mandatory health checks.

Can you fault this?

Me? No.

Descriminatiom laws would fault it. You'd be banning all girls from entry to "the West" because they don't have clits - totally illegal under a number of acts and treaties.

Why do you want to exhempt boys from the legislation? I'm curious.

You'd be okay. You're intact, remember.

Start a thread about cocks and ask there.

Don't want to say, eh?

Back to top

IP Logged

Gordon

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 21729
Gordon
Gender: male

Re: Cocks
Reply #12 - Mar 13^th, 2017 at 4:46pm

Melanias purse wrote on Mar 13^th, 2017 at 4:42pm:

Gordon wrote on Mar 12^th, 2017 at 5:45pm:

Melanias purse wrote on Mar 12^th, 2017 at 5:34pm:

Gordon wrote on Mar 12^th, 2017 at 12:35pm:

Melanias purse wrote on Mar 11^th, 2017 at 2:57pm:

Gordon wrote on Mar 10^th, 2017 at 12:12pm:

parents of children U18 who've been subjected to FGM would be ineligible for immigration to any western country.

That would provide a disincentive to the practice.

Good idea, Gordon. This would require every girl entering Australia to have their clits checked.

But I'm curious - should we do the same for boys?

You should be okay. You're intact.

Firstly Karnal, this thread is about female genitalia. If you're so desperate to talk about penises then start your own thread.

As for checking clits, make it very well known that cutting or FGM or whatever you prefer to call it of girls under age 18 makes immigration to the west ineligible for parents.

What a great incentive not to do it!!!

As for checking, they'd simply bring a doctors certificate to the stage one interview and another check could be done during the mandatory health checks.

Can you fault this?

Me? No.

Descriminatiom laws would fault it. You'd be banning all girls from entry to "the West" because they don't have clits - totally illegal under a number of acts and treaties.

Why do you want to exhempt boys from the legislation? I'm curious.

You'd be okay. You're intact, remember.

Start a thread about cocks and ask there.

Don't want to say, eh?

I said. You ignored.

I'm not a proponent of male circumcision but clearly it doesn't cause the health issues and sexual dysfunction of FGM.

Hope this helps.

Back to top

IBI

IP Logged

Gordon Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 21729 Gordon Gender:	Re: Cocks Reply #13 - Mar 13^th, 2017 at 4:46pm Gordon wrote on Mar 13^th, 2017 at 3:15pm: Mortha, do you have an opinion on this? I wouldn't circumcise a boy but on the basis of ongoing health issues and the sexual dysfunction caused by FGM, they're not even if the same ballpark. Are we in agreement on this one? Mothra ???
Back to top	IBI IP Logged

cods

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 88048

Re: Cocks
Reply #14 - Mar 13^th, 2017 at 4:48pm

Gordon wrote on Mar 13^th, 2017 at 1:54pm:

I have very little interest on the subject but I notice you've mentioned penises and circumcision 100s of times in various threads.

One question for you.

Does male circumcision cause the same level of medical problems or sexual dysfunction as does FGM?

about says it all...

karnal seems to find the habit amusing..and worthy of mocking.

Back to top

IP Logged