Dnarever wrote on Mar 5^th, 2017 at 9:08am:


absolute garbage...

I've been on a few open live forums lately with Americans... there is non stop Praise for Trump...

just like before the election how the Lame Stream Media said. that Clinton was going to win by a landslide!!! and everyone hated Trump!!!

Turns out... IT WAS ALL FAKE NEWS AND LIES...

and now after the election?

"oh, he's so unpopular." ... BULLSHIT>>>>>>>>

and that of the ongoing attacks on the Trump administration is an utter disgrace... 

These Leftwankers just will not accept the election result.

and the main reason that they want Trump out is because he's already making the passed Presidents look like Jackass's and crooks..

which they are...

they have to get Him out ASAP because things are going so well... the stock market is BOOMING and everyone in the US has now got more confidence and hope is back in town...

so far he's smashing it out of the park..

SO LETS BRING THE RUSSIANS BACK....

THE RUSSIANS ARE COMING THE RUSSIANS ARE COMING..

and it was the ******* Clintons who sold Uranium to the Russians...

after they forced them to donate MILLIONS into the Clinton foundation....

fair dinkum....

Richdude wrote on Mar 6^th, 2017 at 12:54am:



X 2

Sprintcyclist wrote on Mar 6^th, 2017 at 12:14pm:



based on what? massive grass-roots anti-trump demonstrations across the nation and historically lowest-ever approval ratings of the president?

ALL the evidence points to him being massive UNpopular.

and the Republicans in congress are slowly coming around to oppose him as well.  Impeachment before year's end is a high possibility.

longweekend58 wrote on Mar 6^th, 2017 at 12:23pm:


Face up to reality, his only unpopularity is with leftard sh!t, illegal border crossers, drug mules, criminals in general but Mexicans in particular, queers, and the luvvies in Hollywood. The opinionated cr@p of America. The average American welcomes a new begining under Trump.

in light of the wire tapping...

I'll accept everyone apologies who said that the Deep State WaR was BS....

President Elect, The Mechanic wrote on Mar 6^th, 2017 at 8:20pm:



In light of the LIE about wiretapping I accept your apology for supporting a pathological liar - Trump.

NorthOfNorth wrote on Mar 7^th, 2017 at 11:04pm:


you haven't learnt a thing

will an answer help your fantasy of impeaching trump?

NorthOfNorth wrote on Mar 7^th, 2017 at 11:04pm:


No the press has created that impression. They have vilified, harassed and given him no respect at all even though he is POTUS. Trump has shown great restraint in dealing with these fools.

NorthOfNorth wrote on Mar 8^th, 2017 at 12:22am:


Scientology?

No POTUS has ever faced such a hostile, conspiratorial bunch of media dupes as Trump has.

He will derail the gravy train.

WAGP!

There's no Deep State in Washington. There's a Deep Bureaucracy with loyalty to country before President. Big constraint on Trump.

There's no Deep State in Washington. There's a Deep Bureaucracy with loyalty to country before President. Big constraint on Trump.

Within five minutes, Carswell got a return call from Trump’s publicist, a man named John Miller, who immediately jumped into a startlingly frank and detailed explanation of why Trump dumped Maples for the Italian model Carla Bruni. “He really didn’t want to make a commitment,” Miller said. “He’s coming out of a marriage, and he’s starting to do tremendously well financially.”

Miller turned out to be a remarkably forthcoming source — a spokesman with rare insight into the private thoughts and feelings of his client. “Have you met him?” Miller asked the reporter. “He’s a good guy, and he’s not going to hurt anybody. . . . He treated his wife well and . . . he will treat Marla well.”

Some reporters found the calls from Miller or Barron disturbing or even creepy; others thought they were just examples of Trump being playful. Today, as the presumptive Republican nominee for president faces questions about his attitudes toward women, what stands out to some who received those calls is Trump’s characterization of women whom he portrayed as drawn to him sexually.

“Actresses,” Miller said in the call to Carswell, “just call to see if they can go out with him and things.” Madonna “wanted to go out with him.” And Trump’s alter ego boasted that in addition to living with Maples, Trump had “three other girlfriends.”

Miller was consistent about referring to Trump as “he,” but at one point, when asked how important Bruni was in Trump’s busy love life, the spokesman said, “I think it’s somebody that — you know, she’s beautiful. I saw her once, quickly, and beautiful . . . ” and then he quickly pivoted back into talking about Trump — then a 44-year-old father of three — in the third person.

In 1990, Trump testified in a court case that “I believe on occasion I used that name.”

In a phone call to NBC’s “Today” program Friday morning after this article appeared online, Trump denied that he was John Miller. “No, I don’t think it — I don’t know anything about it. You’re telling me about it for the first time and it doesn’t sound like my voice at all,” he said. “I have many, many people that are trying to imitate my voice and then you can imagine that, and this sounds like one of the scams, one of the many scams — doesn’t sound like me.” Later, he was more definitive: “It was not me on the phone. And it doesn’t sound like me on the phone, I will tell you that, and it was not me on the phone. And when was this? Twenty-five years ago?”

Then, Friday afternoon, Washington Post reporters who were 44 minutes into a phone interview with Trump about his finances asked him a question about Miller: “Did you ever employ someone named John Miller as a spokesperson?”

The phone went silent, then dead. When the reporters called back and reached Trump’s secretary, she said, “I heard you got disconnected. He can’t take the call now. I don’t know what happened.”

Trump has never been terribly adamant about denying that he often made calls to reporters posing as someone else. From his earliest years in business, he occasionally called reporters using the name “John Barron.”

A “John Baron,” described as a “vice-president of the Trump organization,” appeared in a front-page New York Times article as early as 1980, defending Trump’s decision to destroy sculptures on the facade of the Bonwit Teller department store building, the Fifth Avenue landmark he was demolishing to make way for his Trump Tower. Barron was quoted variously as a “Trump spokesman,” “Trump executive” or “Trump representative” in New York magazine, The Washington Post and other publications.

Trump’s fascination with the name “Barron” persisted for decades. When he was seeing Maples while still married to Ivana, he sometimes used the code name “the Baron” when he left messages for her. In 2004, when Trump commissioned a dramatic TV series based on the life of a New York real estate mogul like him, his only request to the writer was to name the main character “Barron.” And when Trump and his third wife, Melania, had a son, they named him Barron.

In the 1991 recording, Miller sounded quite at ease regaling the reporter with tales of Trump hanging out with Madonna at a ball at the Plaza Hotel, which he owned at the time. Asked about the rumored Madonna-Trump friendship, Miller, unlike every other PR man on the planet, neither batted the question away nor gave it short shrift. Rather, he said, “Do you have a second?”

Carswell, the reporter, sounded a bit startled: “Yeah, obviously,” she replied.

Whereupon Miller offered a detailed account of the Trump encounter with Madonna, who “came in a beautiful evening gown and combat boots.” The PR man assured the reporter that nothing untoward occurred: “He’s got zero interest that night.”

Miller also revealed to Carswell why Trump seemed to relish any and all media coverage, even the most critical. “I can tell you that he didn’t care if he got bad PR until he got his divorce finished,” Miller said. The more the press wrote about Trump’s money troubles, the greater advantage he would have in negotiations toward a financial settlement with his then-estranged wife, Ivana. Then, “once his divorce is finished,” Miller said, you would see stories about how Trump was “doing well financially and he’s doing well in every other way.”

NorthOfNorth wrote on Mar 8^th, 2017 at 10:28am:


I don't even understand how it's bad press. It's news.

Big Donger wrote on Mar 8^th, 2017 at 10:55am:

Yes... Although they, themselves would have considered it bad press (and sometimes it was bad press)...

BTW according to certain reporters, Obama did not appreciate being lampooned and having his statements twisted for comical or political effect and would tell the reporter as much and in an animated way... However, it was always done privately and not via a neurotic twitter-storm... And it wasn't over every issue large or trivial.

NorthOfNorth wrote on Mar 8^th, 2017 at 11:56am:


Well yes, but did he declare a "war on the media"? Did he declare them "enemies of the American people?" Did he accuse them of telling porkies? Did he refuse them entry to White House press briefings?

That would be the sensible thing to do, shurely.

But I'm curious. Can you see evidence of any bias or fake news in the article I've quoted above?

Can you understand why anyone might consider it to be an unreasonable attack on a presidential candidate?

NorthOfNorth wrote on Mar 8^th, 2017 at 11:56am:


Well yes, but did he declare a "war on the media"? Did he declare them "enemies of the American people?" Did he accuse them of telling porkies? Did he refuse them entry to White House press briefings?

That would be the sensible thing to do, shurely.

But I'm curious. Can you see evidence of any bias or fake news in the article I've quoted above?

Can you understand why anyone might consider it to be an unreasonable attack on a presidential candidate?

“As of October 2014 the CIA was also looking at infecting the vehicle control systems used by modern cars and trucks. The purpose of such control is not specified, but it would permit the CIA to engage in nearly undetectable assassinations,” writes Wikileaks.

After the death of journalist Michael Hastings in 2013, who contacted Wikileaks just hours before his death to inform them that he was under FBI investigation, speculation swirled as to whether his apparent high speed car crash in the Hancock Park neighborhood of Los Angeles was actually a targeted assassination.

Hastings sent an email hours before his death stating he was “onto a big story” and needed “to go off the rada[r] for a bit.” It later emerged that the story was likely to have been an exposé of the CIA.

Friends and colleagues confirmed that the journalist was “very paranoid” about being under government surveillance and had received death threats. A separate close friend of Hastings also told Infowars that the journalist’s home was visited by agents from an unnamed federal agency the day before his death.

Former counter-terror czar Richard Clarke subsequently went on record to remark that the crash involving Hastings was “consistent with a car cyber attack.”

The fact that the CIA was exploring car hacking techniques in October 2014 obviously suggests that the technology has been an area of interest for the agency.

EVERY politican gets lampooned. It is part of the job. The problem comes when the politician performs so badly and so offensively that mere lampooning is not enough; where no comical approach even gets close to how bad they are.

Trump is on his way to being the greatest President ever - hopefully for 8 years.

longweekend58 wrote on Mar 8^th, 2017 at 12:04pm:

True... With Trump we're in a whole new paradigm of stupid...

He set himself up for lampooning years ago with 'birther'... Then, as if that wasn't enough, he sued Bill Maher over Maher's comical suggestion that Trump was the son of an orangutan...

Trump's stupidity is bottomless... This kind of stupid appears to be a uniquely American kind of stupid... When it comes to dumb, American culture is happy to blindly go where no culture has gone before...

NorthOfNorth wrote on Mar 8^th, 2017 at 1:27pm:



ah, that would be the reason that every nation on earth copies their culture, watches their movies, adores their celebrities, eats their fast food ,copies their theme parks, flock to see their rockstars, copies their music,  buys their software, buys their smartphones, communicates on their social media....because americans are just so stupid 

aquascoot wrote on Mar 8^th, 2017 at 2:20pm:



I buy samsung.

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Mar 8^th, 2017 at 2:24pm:



well the prime minister of south korea may be facing serious jail time over accepting millions in bribes from samsung, so i think Trump and american tech  may be more ethical

NorthOfNorth wrote on Mar 8^th, 2017 at 2:23pm:


i'm not saying i agree with it. 
i'm not saying you should do it.
i'm just saying that america is pretty smart at understanding the durp state most people are in .
they arent stupid.
trump is pretty smart at understanding the durp state most people are in.
he isnt stupid.

There are 2 important aspects of climbing the narrow road to success and both are to do with the person you "become".

route one is to be a killer executor who takes massive action. do that and you will get enough "reference experiences ' to understand "reality".

route two is to attempt to become spiritually enlightened.
the trouble with a lot of people who go this route is that they are just as attached to their ego (i am a spiritually enlightened person , look at me) as some rich prick flaunting his ferrari ( i am rich and successful, look at me).

at the core, the morally superior intellectula who is attached to that is no different to the rich businessman who is attached to his toys. its the same sh*t.

NorthOfNorth wrote on Mar 8^th, 2017 at 1:27pm:



ah, that would be the reason that every nation on earth copies their culture, watches their movies, adores their celebrities, eats their fast food ,copies their theme parks, flock to see their rockstars, copies their music,  buys their software, buys their smartphones, communicates on their social media....because americans are just so stupid 

aquascoot wrote on Mar 8^th, 2017 at 2:20pm:



Yes and historically, the greater America has been, the better the world has been.

Sprintcyclist wrote on Mar 8^th, 2017 at 3:05pm:



which is why the rest of the world is freaking out over the absolute CLOWN they put in charge of the joint.

longweekend58 wrote on Mar 8^th, 2017 at 3:46pm:



no longy, YOU and people like YOU are freaking out because you like the comfort zone, the familiar, the pleasuring of yourself that you can get in a durrrr state.

America has had periods that were way more chaotic.
the great depression
pearl harbour and WW2
the cuban missile crisis
assasination of JFK
the vietnam war
twin towers

you have to go thru chaos to move forward
systems re arrange themselves and make themselves better during periods of chaos

if trump upsets the status quo, this is a good thing

some light reading for you

aquascoot wrote on Mar 8^th, 2017 at 3:58pm:


Really?

The status quo is that we don't accept women being sexually assaulted.

You're happy with Trump changing that, are you?

I wonder how the 40 million people on the unemployment queues felt about Donald Trump being elected, call me optimistic but I would say they felt pretty damned good..because someone has finally  turned up who actually gives a dam about them


Oh and the 30% of Americans NOT covered by Obama Care most probably feel pretty chuffed too 

you still don't get it. think about why people support protectionist measures for industry. think about why people want a wall on the border. think about why people want the interventions in the middle east to stop. think about why ordinary working people are tired of being lectured to by people who don't share their interests, such as celebrities, soros, academics and about 90% of journalists. 99% of criticisms of trump never hit on any of these issues. they always dance around them.

if trump upsets the status quo, this is a good thing

That might be true, but Trump's own record shows he's no better.  Sure, he's only ruined lives in the private sector not politics (at least up until his inauguration) so you can't link to specific instances of his wrong doing, or at least selfish exploitative behaviour in politics, but look at who he is surrounding himself with.

He's no better than the establishment his apologists like to paint, only less competent and less capable.

And for all your hate on celebrities, they've turned to him in a big way because he is a celebrity.

His business dealing may have worked out well for him, his family and the higher ups in the executive levels, but not many others. 

Again, I want to be wrong, but it looks like his politics will be the same, not that good for the people on the ground, but great for him, his family and his inner circle.

The only real "evidence" we have to go on that would suggest that he will be different, is his word.  We know what that's worth.

But just in case you didn't, sweet bugger all.

Look at how his ObamaCare replacement is shaping up...  That was meant to be one of his more easy fixes, again, if you believed him.

The short version is that many people see in Trump what they want, all under the banner of "make america great again".  I don't know why they've chosen Trump given the irrefutable facts about his past and when that sort of dishonest and exploitative nature continues, they double down and defend him when much less was utterly unacceptable under his opponents.

You can go on about how all these other type of people are out of touch etc, but it like you've dismissed everyone else in the room, got to Trump and though "well, there is nobody else here, no point in running a background check on him".

He's almost getting the support of the people, by default.

He hasn't earned it and he doesn't stand for what people use to justify their support of him. 

He wants cheap labour, he wants to exploit undocumented or imported workers, he wants more tax cuts and better treatment for the rich, he wants to keep the loopholes in place that he and his trust/corporate setups use to not pay any tax in the first place, he was a believer in universal health care like Obamacare and a woman's right to choose, hell he even said the state should stay out of the bathroom debate and let people use which ever one they want.

But he's back tracked on all of that or is simply telling the people what he thinks they need to hear to win their trust.

Sure his opponents aren't perfect, but unless people are willing to apply the same logic and standards to their support of Trump as they do to their hatred of his opponents, he'll be nothing more than the winner by default, undeserving of their support and he'll turn on them and exploit them as soon as he gets the chance, again for his own personal gain.

The fact that many like you can't see this, or choose to look the other way is very scary.

How long before we get 'Deep State' - the movie?

It's a perfect (but soon to be hackneyed) title for a conspiracy theory plot...

SadKangaroo wrote on Mar 9^th, 2017 at 7:18am:


i've stated this before, but i'll form a proper judgment on his achievements, or lack thereof, after he's spent more time in the role - somewhere between the 100 days and 3 year mark. if he fails to carry out some of the main issues he spoke about, then i'll criticise him. at this stage though, it's just frothing at the mouth leftists offering comment, and they're far too emotional and retarded to be taken seriously.

trump's main purpose is to put a dent in leftardism - the cultural and racist loathing and hate perpetuated by the left. this concern overrides all others. a few lies - either real or imaginary - don't register. do you think leftards care about their lies and violence when trying to implement their identity politics fantasies? no. the rules have changed. live with it. alinksy is now an alt-rightist.