Brian Ross
|
Frank wrote on Mar 6 th, 2017 at 9:02pm: Brian Ross wrote on Mar 5 th, 2017 at 10:53pm: Frank wrote on Mar 5 th, 2017 at 8:34pm: Brian Ross wrote on Mar 5 th, 2017 at 7:49pm: Frank wrote on Mar 5 th, 2017 at 6:03pm: Brian Ross wrote on Mar 4 th, 2017 at 4:15pm: Ah, yes we only get half the story, don't we, Mechie? Tsk, tsk. lets hear his side of what happened and then we'll make our mind up. One man's actions does not condemn an entire religious group. Tsk, tsk. It just illustrates them. And why is he still in his nightshirt, on the street? What's the story there? I have seen other Muslims do that. Why don't they get dressed properly before they leave the house? And name-calling bacon-eaters??? Rude bastard. Tsk, tsk, who cares what he looks like, Soren? Why do you focus almost exclusively on the externalities of people? Why the emphasis on how he is dressed? He is wearing his culturally appropriate clothing, just as this person is: http://www.deadlinenews.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/04-slanj-kilt-row.jpgHow come we never hear you criticising Scotsmen? Irishmen? Welshmen? Englishmen? Afterall they wear their culturally appropriate gear, all the time... Tsk, tsk. Your Islamophobia is on display and it's disgusting.... This bloke is IN Edinburgh, Scotland, ya bampot. How you appear in public communicates who you are. Time, place, occasion. Even a thick buffoon like you would know that without needing it to be spelled out. But of course you'd pretend that the obvious is not obvious - which is what marks you out as the thick, tut-tutting buffoon, pissed on by most here with great satisfaction simply and obviously because you so richly deserve it. Resorting to ad homine debate again, Soren? Tsk, tsk, stop it or you'll go blind! The FACT is that I pointed put your sly idiocy - that bloke was photographed in Scotland. That is the FACT of my post that you cannot refute. That I also expressed my views about you while posting that FACT does not in any way detract or diminish the factuality of the point. The bloke pictured WAS in in Scotland so your point was an idiotic one, arse'ole. See?? Same principle: fact presented to a contemptible buffoon. You ignore the factual truths because you are, correctly, identified as a buffoon. No ad hominem. Only objective facts and correct nomenclature. Fancy that, a Scotsman wearin' a kilt! I wonder, is anything worn under a Scotsman's Kilt, Soren? Or is it all in perfect workin' order?  Your problem is that you want everybody to wear nice little uniforms and march to the beat of the drum that you're drumming, Soren. Tsk, tsk. People wear what they like, as long as they are warm and they are decent, they have committed no crime. Resorting to ad hominem debate simply shows you've lost the debate.
|