Australian Politics Forum - Trumps own SCOTUS nominee skewers him

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Trumps own SCOTUS nominee skewers him
Feb 9^th, 2017 at 4:26pm

http://www.9news.com.au/world/2017/02/09/12/00/neil-gorsuch-supreme-court-nominee-criticises-donald-trump

The judge nominated to the Supreme Court by Donald Trump last week has taken the extraordinary step of criticising the president for his Twitter account.

Neil Gorsuch told a Democratic senator in a private meeting that President Trump's tweets attacking a fellow judge were "demoralising".

Senator Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut told the press after the meeting that Gorsuch was not impressed with the president's behaviour.

"He said very specifically that they were demoralising and disheartening and he characterized them very specifically that way," Senator Blumenthal told CNN.

"As the nominee of a president who has viciously attacked the independence of the judiciary and declared multiple litmus tests for justices, Judge Gorsuch has a special responsibility to reassure the American people that he will be an open-minded and independent jurist."

A spokesperson for Gorsuch later confirmed the exchange.

Trump had been responding to a federal court ordering a stay on his executive order blocking visas for citizens of Syria, Libya, Yemen, Somalia, Sudan, Iraq and Iran.

Trump took aim at George W Bush-appointed judge James Robart after he issued the stay.

Read more at http://www.9news.com.au/world/2017/02/09/12/00/neil-gorsuch-supreme-court-nominee-criticises-donald-trump#EMk8T0C1F52tBkb4.99

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

John Smith Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 78311 Gender:	Re: Trumps own SCOTUS nominee skewers him Reply #1 - Feb 9^th, 2017 at 4:28pm expect a lot more of his 'yes men' to turn on him
Back to top	Our esteemed leader: I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus. IP Logged

longweekend58 Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 45675 Gender:	Re: Trumps own SCOTUS nominee skewers him Reply #2 - Feb 9^th, 2017 at 4:42pm John Smith wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 4:28pm: expect a lot more of his 'yes men' to turn on him IM not sure he was a yes man, but it is good to see some more people from his side of politics giving him a serve.
Back to top	AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..." IP Logged

... Gold Member Offline Posts: 23673 WA Gender:	Re: Trumps own SCOTUS nominee skewers him Reply #3 - Feb 9^th, 2017 at 4:54pm John Smith wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 4:28pm: expect a lot more of his 'yes men' to turn on him I dont think you know what a yes man is.
Back to top	In the fullness of time... IP Logged

longweekend58 Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 45675 Gender:	Re: Trumps own SCOTUS nominee skewers him Reply #4 - Feb 9^th, 2017 at 4:56pm ... wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 4:54pm: John Smith wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 4:28pm: expect a lot more of his 'yes men' to turn on him I dont think you know what a yes man is. so says the poster still trying to explain why 'alternative facts' are okay
Back to top	AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..." IP Logged

...

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 23673
WA
Gender: male

Re: Trumps own SCOTUS nominee skewers him
Reply #5 - Feb 9^th, 2017 at 4:59pm

longweekend58 wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 4:56pm:

... wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 4:54pm:

John Smith wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 4:28pm:

expect a lot more of his 'yes men' to turn on him

I dont think you know what a yes man is.

so says the poster still trying to explain why 'alternative facts' are okay

Lol. Now youre sticking up for john smith, not because im wrong, but because i upset you.

Running short of people willing to put up with your bullshit eh longy? It couldnt have happened to a nicer guy.

Back to top

In the fullness of time...

IP Logged

John Smith Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 78311 Gender:	Re: Trumps own SCOTUS nominee skewers him Reply #6 - Feb 9^th, 2017 at 4:59pm ... wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 4:54pm: John Smith wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 4:28pm: expect a lot more of his 'yes men' to turn on him I dont think you know what a yes man is. you think trump would have nominated anyone who he didn't think was going to toe his line?
Back to top	Our esteemed leader: I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus. IP Logged

...

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 23673
WA
Gender: male

Re: Trumps own SCOTUS nominee skewers him
Reply #7 - Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:01pm

John Smith wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 4:59pm:

... wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 4:54pm:

John Smith wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 4:28pm:

expect a lot more of his 'yes men' to turn on him

I dont think you know what a yes man is.

you think trump would have nominated anyone who he didn't think was going to toe his line? Cheesy

What does it look like smith?

Back to top

In the fullness of time...

IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: Trumps own SCOTUS nominee skewers him
Reply #8 - Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:01pm

... wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 4:59pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 4:56pm:

... wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 4:54pm:

John Smith wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 4:28pm:

expect a lot more of his 'yes men' to turn on him

I dont think you know what a yes man is.

so says the poster still trying to explain why 'alternative facts' are okay

Lol. Now youre sticking up for john smith, not because im wrong, but because i upset you.

Running short of people willing to put up with your bullshit eh longy? It couldnt have happened to a nicer guy.

No, I am asking you to amuse us once again by supporting 'alternative facts'.

It is fun to watch you and your fellow trump-apologists trun yourselves inside out trying to support his incredible lies.

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

... Gold Member Offline Posts: 23673 WA Gender:	Re: Trumps own SCOTUS nominee skewers him Reply #9 - Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:02pm Youre not having fun at all longy. I dont think youve had fun this millennium.
Back to top	In the fullness of time... IP Logged

John Smith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 78311
Gender: male

Re: Trumps own SCOTUS nominee skewers him
Reply #10 - Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:03pm

... wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:01pm:

John Smith wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 4:59pm:

... wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 4:54pm:

John Smith wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 4:28pm:

expect a lot more of his 'yes men' to turn on him

I dont think you know what a yes man is.

you think trump would have nominated anyone who he didn't think was going to toe his line? Cheesy

What does it look like smith?

what does what look like Honky?

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: Trumps own SCOTUS nominee skewers him
Reply #11 - Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:03pm

... wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:02pm:

Youre not having fun at all longy. I dont think youve had fun this millennium.

Oh I am having a great deal of fun and every day I go online just to see what incredibly stupid thing Trump has done. It is never a disappointment.

TODAY he rang his national security advisor to ask him about the US dollar. The advisor told him to 'call an economist'

What a dunce that Trump is.

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

...

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 23673
WA
Gender: male

Re: Trumps own SCOTUS nominee skewers him
Reply #12 - Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:07pm

John Smith wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:03pm:

... wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:01pm:

John Smith wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 4:59pm:

... wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 4:54pm:

John Smith wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 4:28pm:

expect a lot more of his 'yes men' to turn on him

I dont think you know what a yes man is.

you think trump would have nominated anyone who he didn't think was going to toe his line? Cheesy

What does it look like smith?

what does what look like Honky?

Well obviously he has nominated someone for another reason than just to "toe his line". Maybe its because he'd be a good fit for yhe job?

Its not hard to see that you started at your desired conclusion, and worked backwards from there. Its always difficult when reality dorsnt match your preconceptions isnt it?

Back to top

In the fullness of time...

IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: Trumps own SCOTUS nominee skewers him
Reply #13 - Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:09pm

... wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:07pm:

John Smith wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:03pm:

... wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:01pm:

John Smith wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 4:59pm:

... wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 4:54pm:

John Smith wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 4:28pm:

expect a lot more of his 'yes men' to turn on him

I dont think you know what a yes man is.

you think trump would have nominated anyone who he didn't think was going to toe his line? Cheesy

What does it look like smith?

what does what look like Honky?

Well obviously he has nominated someone for another reason than just to "toe his line". Maybe its because he'd be a good fit for yhe job?

Its not hard to see that you started at your desired conclusion, and worked backwards from there. Its always difficult when reality dorsnt match your preconceptions isnt it?

and do you support the mans opinion on your beloved Trumps deeply disturbing twitter commentary on the judicial system?

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

... Gold Member Offline Posts: 23673 WA Gender:	Re: Trumps own SCOTUS nominee skewers him Reply #14 - Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:13pm Im not sure, im going to need more information, straight from the horses mouth.
Back to top	In the fullness of time... IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: Trumps own SCOTUS nominee skewers him
Reply #15 - Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:18pm

... wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:13pm:

Im not sure, im going to need more information, straight from the horses mouth.

LOL...

let me guess how this goes.

A poster goes to lengths to list all the offensive and stupid Trump comments and tweets and then you scream FAKE NEWS and go on your normal deluded way.

The link in the OP can give you all you need to know... but we know you wont do that.

'The delusion is strong in this one...'

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

John Smith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 78311
Gender: male

Re: Trumps own SCOTUS nominee skewers him
Reply #16 - Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:25pm

... wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:07pm:

John Smith wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:03pm:

... wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:01pm:

John Smith wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 4:59pm:

... wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 4:54pm:

John Smith wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 4:28pm:

expect a lot more of his 'yes men' to turn on him

I dont think you know what a yes man is.

you think trump would have nominated anyone who he didn't think was going to toe his line? Cheesy

What does it look like smith?

what does what look like Honky?

Well obviously he has nominated someone for another reason than just to "toe his line". Maybe its because he'd be a good fit for yhe job?

like his education secretary? Cheesy

Probably the only thing stopping him putting a family member in as a supreme court judge was the fact that they have to be qualified.

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

...

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 23673
WA
Gender: male

Re: Trumps own SCOTUS nominee skewers him
Reply #17 - Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:25pm

Quote:

Neil Gorsuch told a Democratic senator in a private meeting that President Trump's tweets attacking a fellow judge were "demoralising".

Senator Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut told the press after the meeting that Gorsuch was not impressed with the president's behaviour.

Interesting that only one word was a direct quotation from Neil Gorsuch, while the rest of the fluff was spoken by Richard Blumenthal.

As I said, I need more information straight from the horses mouth.

Back to top

In the fullness of time...

IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: Trumps own SCOTUS nominee skewers him
Reply #18 - Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:33pm

... wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:25pm:

Quote:

Neil Gorsuch told a Democratic senator in a private meeting that President Trump's tweets attacking a fellow judge were "demoralising".

Senator Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut told the press after the meeting that Gorsuch was not impressed with the president's behaviour.

Interesting that only one word was a direct quotation from Neil Gorsuch, while the rest of the fluff was spoken by Richard Blumenthal.

As I said, I need more information straight from the horses mouth.

and there we go... more of the 'fake news' delusion.

idiot.

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

John Smith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 78311
Gender: male

Re: Trumps own SCOTUS nominee skewers him
Reply #19 - Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:35pm

... wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:25pm:

Interesting that only one word was a direct quotation from Neil Gorsuch, while the rest of the fluff was spoken by Richard Blumenthal.

As I said, I need more information straight from the horses mouth.

you must have missed this bit Cheesy

A spokesperson for Gorsuch later confirmed the exchange.

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

...

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 23673
WA
Gender: male

Re: Trumps own SCOTUS nominee skewers him
Reply #20 - Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:39pm

John Smith wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:35pm:

... wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:25pm:

Interesting that only one word was a direct quotation from Neil Gorsuch, while the rest of the fluff was spoken by Richard Blumenthal.

As I said, I need more information straight from the horses mouth.

you must have missed this bit Cheesy

A spokesperson for Gorsuch later confirmed the exchange.

No, I did not miss that, I'm simply better at finding meaning than you are.

This says that a spokesperson confirmed AN exchange, not that this particular rendition of it is verbatim.

Back to top

In the fullness of time...

IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: Trumps own SCOTUS nominee skewers him
Reply #21 - Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:39pm

John Smith wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:35pm:

... wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:25pm:

Interesting that only one word was a direct quotation from Neil Gorsuch, while the rest of the fluff was spoken by Richard Blumenthal.

As I said, I need more information straight from the horses mouth.

you must have missed this bit Cheesy

A spokesperson for Gorsuch later confirmed the exchange.

He missed the entire thing including all the tweets themselves.

It is fun watching trumpoid twist around like this.

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: Trumps own SCOTUS nominee skewers him
Reply #22 - Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:41pm

... wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:39pm:

John Smith wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:35pm:

... wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:25pm:

Interesting that only one word was a direct quotation from Neil Gorsuch, while the rest of the fluff was spoken by Richard Blumenthal.

As I said, I need more information straight from the horses mouth.

you must have missed this bit Cheesy

A spokesperson for Gorsuch later confirmed the exchange.

No, I did not miss that, I'm simply better at finding meaning than you are.

This says that a spokesperson confirmed AN exchange, not that this particular rendition of it is verbatim.

LOL you are better at AVOIDING meaning. The meaning is very clear that the exchange happened exactly as reported.

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

John Smith Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 78311 Gender:	Re: Trumps own SCOTUS nominee skewers him Reply #23 - Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:41pm ... wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:39pm: No, I did not miss that, I'm simply better at finding meaning than you are. This says that a spokesperson confirmed AN exchange, not that this particular rendition of it is verbatim. actually he confirmed THE exchange
Back to top	Our esteemed leader: I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus. IP Logged

...

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 23673
WA
Gender: male

Re: Trumps own SCOTUS nominee skewers him
Reply #24 - Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:43pm

John Smith wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:41pm:

... wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:39pm:

No, I did not miss that, I'm simply better at finding meaning than you are.

This says that a spokesperson confirmed AN exchange, not that this particular rendition of it is verbatim.

actually he confirmed THE exchange Cheesy

All that we're given is one word - that cannot, by definition, be an exchange.

All I need is peoples own words. Is that too much to ask?

Back to top

In the fullness of time...

IP Logged

...

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 23673
WA
Gender: male

Re: Trumps own SCOTUS nominee skewers him
Reply #25 - Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:44pm

longweekend58 wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:41pm:

... wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:39pm:

John Smith wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:35pm:

... wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:25pm:

Interesting that only one word was a direct quotation from Neil Gorsuch, while the rest of the fluff was spoken by Richard Blumenthal.

As I said, I need more information straight from the horses mouth.

you must have missed this bit Cheesy

A spokesperson for Gorsuch later confirmed the exchange.

No, I did not miss that, I'm simply better at finding meaning than you are.

This says that a spokesperson confirmed AN exchange, not that this particular rendition of it is verbatim.

LOL you are better at AVOIDING meaning. The meaning is very clear that the exchange happened exactly as reported.

How easily and uncritically you accept what fits with your prejudices.

Don't worry, you're not alone on that score.

Back to top

In the fullness of time...

IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: Trumps own SCOTUS nominee skewers him
Reply #26 - Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:45pm

... wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:43pm:

John Smith wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:41pm:

... wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:39pm:

No, I did not miss that, I'm simply better at finding meaning than you are.

This says that a spokesperson confirmed AN exchange, not that this particular rendition of it is verbatim.

actually he confirmed THE exchange Cheesy

All that we're given is one word - that cannot, by definition, be an exchange.

All I need is peoples own words. Is that too much to ask?

in this case, yes. You were not party to an unrecorded conversation. You are however party to the summation of that conversaion and its salient points as agreed to by BOTH parties.

You cannot continue to deny the undeniable.

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: Trumps own SCOTUS nominee skewers him
Reply #27 - Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:47pm

... wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:44pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:41pm:

... wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:39pm:

John Smith wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:35pm:

... wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:25pm:

Interesting that only one word was a direct quotation from Neil Gorsuch, while the rest of the fluff was spoken by Richard Blumenthal.

As I said, I need more information straight from the horses mouth.

you must have missed this bit Cheesy

A spokesperson for Gorsuch later confirmed the exchange.

No, I did not miss that, I'm simply better at finding meaning than you are.

This says that a spokesperson confirmed AN exchange, not that this particular rendition of it is verbatim.

LOL you are better at AVOIDING meaning. The meaning is very clear that the exchange happened exactly as reported.

How easily and uncritically you accept what fits with your prejudices.

Don't worry, you're not alone on that score.

tell me... how many people (approx) were physically at the Trump inauguration? was it bigger than Obama's in 2009 as Trump has claime or not?

this is an easy answer for an intelligent person.

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

...

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 23673
WA
Gender: male

Re: Trumps own SCOTUS nominee skewers him
Reply #28 - Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:48pm

longweekend58 wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:45pm:

... wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:43pm:

John Smith wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:41pm:

... wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:39pm:

No, I did not miss that, I'm simply better at finding meaning than you are.

This says that a spokesperson confirmed AN exchange, not that this particular rendition of it is verbatim.

actually he confirmed THE exchange Cheesy

All that we're given is one word - that cannot, by definition, be an exchange.

All I need is peoples own words. Is that too much to ask?

in this case, yes.

Then how could a reasonable person unequivocally state an opinion on something, when the only available source has been injected with bias?

How I ask you - how?

Back to top

In the fullness of time...

IP Logged

...

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 23673
WA
Gender: male

Re: Trumps own SCOTUS nominee skewers him
Reply #29 - Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:49pm

longweekend58 wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:47pm:

... wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:44pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:41pm:

... wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:39pm:

John Smith wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:35pm:

... wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:25pm:

Interesting that only one word was a direct quotation from Neil Gorsuch, while the rest of the fluff was spoken by Richard Blumenthal.

As I said, I need more information straight from the horses mouth.

you must have missed this bit Cheesy

A spokesperson for Gorsuch later confirmed the exchange.

No, I did not miss that, I'm simply better at finding meaning than you are.

This says that a spokesperson confirmed AN exchange, not that this particular rendition of it is verbatim.

LOL you are better at AVOIDING meaning. The meaning is very clear that the exchange happened exactly as reported.

How easily and uncritically you accept what fits with your prejudices.

Don't worry, you're not alone on that score.

tell me... how many people (approx) were physically at the Trump inauguration? was it bigger than Obama's in 2009 as Trump has claime or not?

this is an easy answer for an intelligent person.

Physically at the inauguration - no it was not.

But undoubtedly it was the most witnessed inauguration ever.

If you bothered listening to sean Spicers own words, this would not confuse you so.

Back to top

In the fullness of time...

IP Logged

John Smith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 78311
Gender: male

Re: Trumps own SCOTUS nominee skewers him
Reply #30 - Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:49pm

... wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:43pm:

John Smith wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:41pm:

... wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:39pm:

No, I did not miss that, I'm simply better at finding meaning than you are.

This says that a spokesperson confirmed AN exchange, not that this particular rendition of it is verbatim.

actually he confirmed THE exchange Cheesy

All that we're given is one word - that cannot, by definition, be an exchange.

All I need is peoples own words. Is that too much to ask?

so you think he confirmed a totally different exchange? surely if that were the case he would have made it known he'd been duped by now, don't you think?

Especially thrumpy and his penchant for twittering. Cheesy

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: Trumps own SCOTUS nominee skewers him
Reply #31 - Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:51pm

... wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:48pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:45pm:

... wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:43pm:

John Smith wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:41pm:

... wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:39pm:

No, I did not miss that, I'm simply better at finding meaning than you are.

This says that a spokesperson confirmed AN exchange, not that this particular rendition of it is verbatim.

actually he confirmed THE exchange Cheesy

All that we're given is one word - that cannot, by definition, be an exchange.

All I need is peoples own words. Is that too much to ask?

in this case, yes.

Then how could a reasonable person unequivocally state an opinion on something, when the only available source has been injected with bias?

How I ask you - how?

Prove it was 'injected with bias'. This was simply two people agreeing on a statement of what was said during a meeting. You cannot be biased in this case

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

...

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 23673
WA
Gender: male

Re: Trumps own SCOTUS nominee skewers him
Reply #32 - Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:52pm

John Smith wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:49pm:

so you think he confirmed a totally different exchange?

Ask yourself how the question was asked - do you think the reporter relayed the entire conversation before asking for it to be confirmed?

Or, do you think they asked "was there an exchange in which the word "demoralising" was used?

Its subtle stuff, but propaganda doesn't work if its overt.

Back to top

In the fullness of time...

IP Logged

...

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 23673
WA
Gender: male

Re: Trumps own SCOTUS nominee skewers him
Reply #33 - Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:54pm

longweekend58 wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:51pm:

... wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:48pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:45pm:

... wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:43pm:

John Smith wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:41pm:

... wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:39pm:

No, I did not miss that, I'm simply better at finding meaning than you are.

This says that a spokesperson confirmed AN exchange, not that this particular rendition of it is verbatim.

actually he confirmed THE exchange Cheesy

All that we're given is one word - that cannot, by definition, be an exchange.

All I need is peoples own words. Is that too much to ask?

in this case, yes.

Then how could a reasonable person unequivocally state an opinion on something, when the only available source has been injected with bias?

How I ask you - how?

Prove it was 'injected with bias'. This was simply two people agreeing on a statement of what was said during a meeting. You cannot be biased in this case

Oh god this is getting ridiculous.

ALL texts have a bias. There is no such thing as a neutral text.

I would have expected a litereary genius like yourself to know that which is taught in the first week of first year English/journalism courses.

Back to top

In the fullness of time...

IP Logged

longweekend58 Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 45675 Gender:	Re: Trumps own SCOTUS nominee skewers him Reply #34 - Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:56pm And this is how you end up believing in the Bowling Green MAssacre or that Trump had 2million+ at his inauguration. You start at the desire outcome and simply work back changing facts along the way. idiot.
Back to top	AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..." IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: Trumps own SCOTUS nominee skewers him
Reply #35 - Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:58pm

... wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:54pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:51pm:

... wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:48pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:45pm:

... wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:43pm:

John Smith wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:41pm:

... wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:39pm:

No, I did not miss that, I'm simply better at finding meaning than you are.

This says that a spokesperson confirmed AN exchange, not that this particular rendition of it is verbatim.

actually he confirmed THE exchange Cheesy

All that we're given is one word - that cannot, by definition, be an exchange.

All I need is peoples own words. Is that too much to ask?

in this case, yes.

Then how could a reasonable person unequivocally state an opinion on something, when the only available source has been injected with bias?

How I ask you - how?

Prove it was 'injected with bias'. This was simply two people agreeing on a statement of what was said during a meeting. You cannot be biased in this case

Oh god this is getting ridiculous.

ALL texts have a bias. There is no such thing as a neutral text.

I would have expected a litereary genius like yourself to know that which is taught in the first week of first year English/journalism courses.

what a ridiculous claim. Text inherently carries a degree of bias by virtue of people writing it. but that degree may also be infinitessimally small so if you are going to make that ridiculoud claim then you have to QUANTIFY the degree of bias.

Ive played games with nuttes like you before. It is always the .1% argument while avoiding the 99.9%. Thats why you end up believing in the flat earth or vaccines cause autism etc

idiot.

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

John Smith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 78311
Gender: male

Re: Trumps own SCOTUS nominee skewers him
Reply #36 - Feb 9^th, 2017 at 6:10pm

... wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:52pm:

John Smith wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:49pm:

so you think he confirmed a totally different exchange?

Ask yourself how the question was asked - do you think the reporter relayed the entire conversation before asking for it to be confirmed?

Or, do you think they asked "was there an exchange in which the word "demoralising" was used?

Its subtle stuff, but propaganda doesn't work if its overt.

no idea what the reporter asked ... probably gave him a run down of his story and asked if he could confirm it. Most judges I know tend to ask for specifics before deciding on something.
Like I said, if he hadn't really confirmed it, trump would have tweeted about another fake news story a hundred times by now

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: Trumps own SCOTUS nominee skewers him
Reply #37 - Feb 9^th, 2017 at 6:13pm

John Smith wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 6:10pm:

... wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:52pm:

John Smith wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:49pm:

so you think he confirmed a totally different exchange?

Ask yourself how the question was asked - do you think the reporter relayed the entire conversation before asking for it to be confirmed?

Or, do you think they asked "was there an exchange in which the word "demoralising" was used?

Its subtle stuff, but propaganda doesn't work if its overt.

no idea what the reporter asked ... probably gave him a run down of his story and asked if he could confirm it. Most judges I know tend to ask for specifics before deciding on something.
Like I said, if he hadn't really confirmed it, trump would have tweeted about another fake news story a hundred times by now

forget it. Honky is just the kind of fool for whom there is no possible proof of anything he doesnt like.

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

...

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 23673
WA
Gender: male

Re: Trumps own SCOTUS nominee skewers him
Reply #38 - Feb 9^th, 2017 at 6:29pm

longweekend58 wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:58pm:

... wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:54pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:51pm:

... wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:48pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:45pm:

... wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:43pm:

John Smith wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:41pm:

... wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:39pm:

No, I did not miss that, I'm simply better at finding meaning than you are.

This says that a spokesperson confirmed AN exchange, not that this particular rendition of it is verbatim.

actually he confirmed THE exchange Cheesy

All that we're given is one word - that cannot, by definition, be an exchange.

All I need is peoples own words. Is that too much to ask?

in this case, yes.

Then how could a reasonable person unequivocally state an opinion on something, when the only available source has been injected with bias?

How I ask you - how?

Prove it was 'injected with bias'. This was simply two people agreeing on a statement of what was said during a meeting. You cannot be biased in this case

Oh god this is getting ridiculous.

ALL texts have a bias. There is no such thing as a neutral text.

I would have expected a litereary genius like yourself to know that which is taught in the first week of first year English/journalism courses.

what a ridiculous claim.

A "ridiculous claim" that you go on to confirm as correct in your very next breath.

Quote:

Text inherently carries a degree of bias by virtue of people writing it.

You're just throwing your toys out of the pram at this point.

Back to top

In the fullness of time...

IP Logged

...

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 23673
WA
Gender: male

Re: Trumps own SCOTUS nominee skewers him
Reply #39 - Feb 9^th, 2017 at 6:31pm

John Smith wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 6:10pm:

... wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:52pm:

John Smith wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:49pm:

so you think he confirmed a totally different exchange?

Ask yourself how the question was asked - do you think the reporter relayed the entire conversation before asking for it to be confirmed?

Or, do you think they asked "was there an exchange in which the word "demoralising" was used?

Its subtle stuff, but propaganda doesn't work if its overt.

no idea what the reporter asked ... probably gave him a run down of his story and asked if he could confirm it.

Probably? Or you hope so now I've shown you the flaw in your thinking?

Quote:

Most judges I know tend to ask for specifics before deciding on something.

You don't know any judges and even if you did, it would be irrelevant since it was a spokesperson who confirmed 'something' and a journalist who wrote about it. The judges contribution was one, solitary word.

Back to top

« Last Edit: Feb 9^th, 2017 at 6:46pm by ... »

In the fullness of time...

IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: Trumps own SCOTUS nominee skewers him
Reply #40 - Feb 9^th, 2017 at 6:32pm

... wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 6:29pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:58pm:

... wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:54pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:51pm:

... wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:48pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:45pm:

... wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:43pm:

John Smith wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:41pm:

... wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:39pm:

No, I did not miss that, I'm simply better at finding meaning than you are.

This says that a spokesperson confirmed AN exchange, not that this particular rendition of it is verbatim.

actually he confirmed THE exchange Cheesy

All that we're given is one word - that cannot, by definition, be an exchange.

All I need is peoples own words. Is that too much to ask?

in this case, yes.

Then how could a reasonable person unequivocally state an opinion on something, when the only available source has been injected with bias?

How I ask you - how?

Prove it was 'injected with bias'. This was simply two people agreeing on a statement of what was said during a meeting. You cannot be biased in this case

Oh god this is getting ridiculous.

ALL texts have a bias. There is no such thing as a neutral text.

I would have expected a litereary genius like yourself to know that which is taught in the first week of first year English/journalism courses.

what a ridiculous claim.

A "ridiculous claim" that you go on to confirm as correct in your very next breath.

Quote:

Text inherently carries a degree of bias by virtue of people writing it.

You're just throwing your toys out of the pram at this point.

Incomplete quotes and quots out of context are the bread and butter of fools and propagandists. are you the former, the latter or BOTH?

I see you cant tell me how many people attended Trumps inauguration. Too difficult for you to answer since you have to disagree with your Dark Lord Trump, his head witch COnway and court jester press secretary?

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

...

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 23673
WA
Gender: male

Re: Trumps own SCOTUS nominee skewers him
Reply #41 - Feb 9^th, 2017 at 6:33pm

longweekend58 wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 6:13pm:

John Smith wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 6:10pm:

... wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:52pm:

John Smith wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:49pm:

so you think he confirmed a totally different exchange?

Ask yourself how the question was asked - do you think the reporter relayed the entire conversation before asking for it to be confirmed?

Or, do you think they asked "was there an exchange in which the word "demoralising" was used?

Its subtle stuff, but propaganda doesn't work if its overt.

no idea what the reporter asked ... probably gave him a run down of his story and asked if he could confirm it. Most judges I know tend to ask for specifics before deciding on something.
Like I said, if he hadn't really confirmed it, trump would have tweeted about another fake news story a hundred times by now

forget it. Honky is just the kind of fool for whom there is no possible proof of anything he doesnt like.

Sure there is - peoples own words, untainted by third party bias, as I stated twice already.

Back to top

In the fullness of time...

IP Logged

...

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 23673
WA
Gender: male

Re: Trumps own SCOTUS nominee skewers him
Reply #42 - Feb 9^th, 2017 at 6:35pm

longweekend58 wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 6:32pm:

... wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 6:29pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:58pm:

... wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:54pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:51pm:

... wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:48pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:45pm:

... wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:43pm:

John Smith wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:41pm:

... wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 5:39pm:

No, I did not miss that, I'm simply better at finding meaning than you are.

This says that a spokesperson confirmed AN exchange, not that this particular rendition of it is verbatim.

actually he confirmed THE exchange Cheesy

All that we're given is one word - that cannot, by definition, be an exchange.

All I need is peoples own words. Is that too much to ask?

in this case, yes.

Then how could a reasonable person unequivocally state an opinion on something, when the only available source has been injected with bias?

How I ask you - how?

Prove it was 'injected with bias'. This was simply two people agreeing on a statement of what was said during a meeting. You cannot be biased in this case

Oh god this is getting ridiculous.

ALL texts have a bias. There is no such thing as a neutral text.

I would have expected a litereary genius like yourself to know that which is taught in the first week of first year English/journalism courses.

what a ridiculous claim.

A "ridiculous claim" that you go on to confirm as correct in your very next breath.

Quote:

Text inherently carries a degree of bias by virtue of people writing it.

You're just throwing your toys out of the pram at this point.

Incomplete quotes and quots out of context are the bread and butter of fools and propagandists. are you the former, the latter or BOTH?

And this is why I pointed out that there was only one word of direct quotations in your article.

For some strange reason* you didn't object to it when it plays to your prejudice.

*not strange at all, just unpalatable to you.

Back to top

In the fullness of time...

IP Logged

...

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 23673
WA
Gender: male

Re: Trumps own SCOTUS nominee skewers him
Reply #43 - Feb 9^th, 2017 at 6:39pm

longweekend58 wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 6:32pm:

I see you cant tell me how many people attended Trumps inauguration. Too difficult for you to answer since you have to disagree with your Dark Lord Trump, his head witch COnway and court jester press secretary?

No, too difficult to answer because no such figures are kept. There is no answer.

I did say however that the number that physically attended was lower than Obamas, so what are you crying about?

Back to top

In the fullness of time...

IP Logged

John Smith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 78311
Gender: male

Re: Trumps own SCOTUS nominee skewers him
Reply #44 - Feb 9^th, 2017 at 7:25pm

... wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 6:31pm:

Probably? Or you hope so now I've shown you the flaw in your thinking?

at some time you're supposed to think for yourself and put 2 and 2 together rather than wait for someone to hold your hand.
I'll repeat, given trumps history, if it weren't true trump would have let you know by now.

... wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 6:31pm:

You don't know any judges and even if you did, it would be irrelevant since it was a spokesperson who confirmed 'something' and a journalist who wrote about it. The judges contribution was one, solitary word.

judges aren't in the habit of sending representatives who don't know what they are doing

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

Panther

Gold Member

Offline

My Heart beats True for
the Red White & Blue...

Posts: 11876
Gender: male

Trumps own SCOTUS nominee skewers him...hahahaha
Reply #45 - Feb 9^th, 2017 at 7:30pm

longweekend58 wrote on Feb 9^th, 2017 at 4:26pm:

http://www.9news.com.au/world/2017/02/09/12/00/neil-gorsuch-supreme-court-nominee-criticises-donald-trump

The judge nominated to the Supreme Court by Donald Trump last week has taken the extraordinary step of criticising the president for his Twitter account.

Neil Gorsuch told a Democratic senator in a private meeting that President Trump's tweets attacking a fellow judge were "demoralising".

Senator Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut told the press after the meeting that Gorsuch was not impressed with the president's behaviour.

"He said very specifically that they were demoralising and disheartening and he characterized them very specifically that way," Senator Blumenthal told CNN.

"As the nominee of a president who has viciously attacked the independence of the judiciary and declared multiple litmus tests for justices, Judge Gorsuch has a special responsibility to reassure the American people that he will be an open-minded and independent jurist."

A spokesperson for Gorsuch later confirmed the exchange.

Trump had been responding to a federal court ordering a stay on his executive order blocking visas for citizens of Syria, Libya, Yemen, Somalia, Sudan, Iraq and Iran.

Trump took aim at George W Bush-appointed judge James Robart after he issued the stay.

Read more at http://www.9news.com.au/world/2017/02/09/12/00/neil-gorsuch-supreme-court-nominee-criticises-donald-trump#EMk8T0C1F52tBkb4.99

Reverse psychology.....

I love it! Deceptive Politics at it's very best!

Perfect......Absolutely perfect......doing exactly what's needed to be done.....this will soften the resolve of the more moderate factions of the demonrat party in their resistance towards a Trump nominee, namely himself, as they....the dems....will see him as less a threat to their positions on progressive matters if on the court.

Perfect!!!! Bravo!!!!

Back to top

"When the People fear government there is Tyranny;
When government fears the People there is Freedom & Liberty!"

'
Live FREE or DIE!
'

IP Logged

Panther Gold Member Offline My Heart beats True for the Red White & Blue... Posts: 11876 Gender:	Trump's SCOTUS nominee starts the head games! Reply #46 - Feb 10^th, 2017 at 10:01am This is going to be better than 3D Chess!
Back to top	« Last Edit: Feb 10^th, 2017 at 10:35am by Panther » "When the People fear government there is Tyranny; When government fears the People there is Freedom & Liberty!" ' Live FREE or DIE! ' IP Logged

Postmodern Trendoid III Gold Member Offline Posts: 10300 Gender:	Re: Trumps own SCOTUS nominee skewers him Reply #47 - Feb 10^th, 2017 at 10:29am
Back to top	IP Logged

John Smith Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 78311 Gender:	Re: Trumps own SCOTUS nominee skewers him Reply #48 - Feb 10^th, 2017 at 10:42am hillary voters? most people on here didn't vote for either of them mistie ... you're gonna be so devastated when thrumpy is impeached.
Back to top	Our esteemed leader: I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus. IP Logged

Postmodern Trendoid III Gold Member Offline Posts: 10300 Gender:	Re: Trumps own SCOTUS nominee skewers him Reply #49 - Feb 10^th, 2017 at 10:45am
Back to top	IP Logged

Prime Minister for Canyons Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 26906 Canberra Gender:	Re: Trumps own SCOTUS nominee skewers him Reply #50 - Feb 10^th, 2017 at 10:47am Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Feb 10^th, 2017 at 10:45am: Repetition of jokes. You could write for SNL.
Back to top	In a time of universal deceit — telling the truth is a revolutionary act. No evidence whatsoever it can be attributed to George Orwell or Eric Arthur Blair (in fact the same guy) IP Logged

John Smith Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 78311 Gender:	Re: Trumps own SCOTUS nominee skewers him Reply #51 - Feb 10^th, 2017 at 10:48am
Back to top	Our esteemed leader: I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus. IP Logged

Panther

Gold Member

Offline

My Heart beats True for
the Red White & Blue...

Posts: 11876
Gender: male

Trump's SCOTUS nominee starts the HEAD GAMES!
Reply #52 - Feb 10^th, 2017 at 11:33am

Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Feb 10^th, 2017 at 10:29am:

When the "G" Man gets confirmed by the Senate, the Republican Senate that confirmed him UNANIMOUSLY not long ago, we'll have more of these same Dummy-Spits across Australia & America!

Awwwwwwwwwwww, it must be damn tough being a
Leftist Progressive these days!

Back to top

« Last Edit: Feb 10^th, 2017 at 11:39am by Panther »

"When the People fear government there is Tyranny;
When government fears the People there is Freedom & Liberty!"

'
Live FREE or DIE!
'

IP Logged

longweekend58 Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 45675 Gender:	Re: Trumps own SCOTUS nominee skewers him Reply #53 - Feb 10^th, 2017 at 6:20pm He is rreally going to hate Congress when they repeatedly deny his bills or the courts which will throw out his executive orders.\ It will be fun to watch.
Back to top	AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..." IP Logged