|
Big Donger
|
The Democrats most certainly did not take them for granted, Honky. From Bill Clinton on, their mantra has been, "it's the economy, stupid". Since the GFC, unemployment under Obama dropped from over 10% to less than 5%.
The US has been working on a policy framework similar to Keating's back in the 1990s. With free trade, manufacturing jobs go, but service jobs are created. Keating and both Clintons have promoted the creation of a "smart economy", promoting education to get people away from repetitive, low-skilled manufacturing jobs.
From an economic/GDP point of view, it makes no sense to bring manufacturing jobs back to the US. Higher skilled work produces more wealth per capita. Trump's infrastructure plans make far more sense. If done properly, this will bring economic growth, but this rely on free trade to make use of those highways and bridges. Infrastructure brings economic growth if it allows more people have access to more goods and services.
Tariffs are the last thing Trump's voters will want. They would raise prices of imported goods by up to a third.
Trump's plans are not fully spelt out. Some are good and some are bad. Before he joined the Republicans, he campaigned to raise income taxes on the rich back to pre-Reagan levels of 50-60%. This would also be a good plan - if he does it.
It remains to be seen whether Trump does get the economy going, or if he just plans to be a president for the billionaires' club he belongs to.
My money's on the latter. In the US, the Democrats are seen as the more fiscally responsible party. Clinton created a surplus that Bush blew with foreign wars and more tax cuts for the rich.
|