|
longweekend58
|
Panther wrote on Feb 11 th, 2017 at 12:43pm: longweekend58 wrote on Feb 11 th, 2017 at 7:49am: Richdude wrote on Feb 11 th, 2017 at 2:52am: Big Donger wrote on Feb 11 th, 2017 at 2:28am: Frank wrote on Feb 11 th, 2017 at 12:48am: John Smith wrote on Feb 10 th, 2017 at 9:28am: Donald Trump: US appeals court upholds suspension of travel ban
A US federal appeals court has ruled to uphold the suspension of President Donald Trump's travel ban that restricted travellers from seven predominantly Muslim nations.
Mr Trump's ban temporarily suspended the nation's refugee program and immigration from countries that have raised terrorism concerns.http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-02-10/us-appeals-court-rules-on-trumps-travel-ba...oooh, thrumpys not having a good day today. I can't wait to see what stupid tweet he comes up with in response to this. He will win this, trump. It just makes sense to ban the bastards. he should ban more nationalities. Any 'refugee' who travels back to the country he 'fled' should have his return entry permit cancelled pronto. Family reunion back in the old country. They're not refugees, dear. Many who were held had green cards. You know, a bit like your visa to Australia. Let me explain. America has a proxy war with these countries. It makes sense to vet people coming in from these countries. Logic confuses liberals. VET... your own word. But Trumps idea was nothing more than a BLANKET BAN. do you even know the difference? Whatever words you use, whatever dictionaries you use, how you parse your words, etc...etc...etc
Any Sovereign & Independent Country has the perfect & legitimate right as such, to "VET" any non-citizen, or even Citizen upon entry or reentry into the said Sovereign & Independent Country, in any way they deem fit &/or necessary for National Security.
They don't need, nor should they permit, World Intrusion, Approval, or Consensus on how to construct their laws or implement their procedures especially when dealing with potential National Security issues. One's National Security is non-negotiable, nor is it legally subject to scrutiny from any other Nation or Organization outside it's own borders.
And, in the end, if they see fit to "BAN" any group or entity, they have the perfect right to do so without any external approval.....as long as they are doing so in the best security interests of their own People/Citizens as a whole, for whom they have a complete & ultimate responsibility to. Your ignorance on law is astonishing. You are Trump share a similar view it seems.
|