Australian Politics Forum - Journalists exposes voter fraud conspiracy

lee Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 20194 Gender:	Re: Journalists exposes voter fraud conspiracy Reply #45 - Jan 31^st, 2017 at 4:50pm Raven wrote on Jan 31^st, 2017 at 4:47pm: Trump spent months insulting the intelligence of Americans and getting away with it. He will continue to do so. As opposed to Hilary?
Back to top	IP Logged

lee Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 20194 Gender:	Re: Journalists exposes voter fraud conspiracy Reply #46 - Jan 31^st, 2017 at 4:52pm Raven wrote on Jan 31^st, 2017 at 4:47pm: never in the history of the US has this happened and it hasn't happened now An assertion that has not been tested. I am sure there are some sophisticated ways to do it, that wouldn't be seen at first glance.
Back to top	IP Logged

NorthOfNorth

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 17258
Gender: male

Re: Journalists exposes voter fraud conspiracy
Reply #47 - Jan 31^st, 2017 at 5:10pm

Raven wrote on Jan 31^st, 2017 at 4:47pm:

lee wrote on Jan 31^st, 2017 at 4:02pm:

John Smith wrote on Jan 31^st, 2017 at 3:53pm:

and you claiming trump released evidence that tapper isn't aware off?

Nope. But both Raven and LW have admitted there was voter fraud. How was Tapper unaware?

He was addressing Trump's claims of millions of people committing fraud, never in the history of the US has this happened

And then there's the old adage: 'extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof'... Don't they?

Back to top

Conviction is the art of being certain

IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: Journalists exposes voter fraud conspiracy
Reply #48 - Jan 31^st, 2017 at 5:12pm

Raven wrote on Jan 31^st, 2017 at 4:47pm:

lee wrote on Jan 31^st, 2017 at 4:02pm:

John Smith wrote on Jan 31^st, 2017 at 3:53pm:

and you claiming trump released evidence that tapper isn't aware off?

Nope. But both Raven and LW have admitted there was voter fraud. How was Tapper unaware?

He was addressing Trump's claims of millions of people committing fraud, never in the history of the US has this happened and it hasn't happened now. You wouldn't be able to hide that scale of fraud for long.

Trump knows this which is why he hasn't pulled the trigger on an investigation. If there was even a shred of evidence Trump would be derelict in his duties if he didn't make the investigation the number one priority of his administration. It threatens the very foundation of American democracy.

Trump spent months insulting the intelligence of Americans and getting away with it. He will continue to do so.

exactly and now Lee Trumpoid seems determined to believe in these 'alternative facts'.

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: Journalists exposes voter fraud conspiracy
Reply #49 - Jan 31^st, 2017 at 5:13pm

lee wrote on Jan 31^st, 2017 at 4:52pm:

Raven wrote on Jan 31^st, 2017 at 4:47pm:

never in the history of the US has this happened and it hasn't happened now

An assertion that has not been tested. I am sure there are some sophisticated ways to do it, that wouldn't be seen at first glance.

It has been tested MULTIPLE TIMES. Thats why Trump wont order an investigation because there is no way he will get the result he wants.

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

lee

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 20194
Gender: male

Re: Journalists exposes voter fraud conspiracy
Reply #50 - Jan 31^st, 2017 at 5:18pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 31^st, 2017 at 5:12pm:

exactly and now Lee Trumpoid seems determined to believe in these 'alternative facts'.

Nope.

lee wrote on Jan 29^th, 2017 at 7:05pm:

And Tapper knows this how?

My original post. So how does Tapper know it is not true, if it has not been tested? No "alternative facts".

Like your "alternative facts" on shutting the EPA? Wink

Back to top

IP Logged

lee

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 20194
Gender: male

Re: Journalists exposes voter fraud conspiracy
Reply #51 - Jan 31^st, 2017 at 5:22pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 31^st, 2017 at 5:13pm:

It has been tested MULTIPLE TIMES.

Correction. It has been tested multiple times in the past. That has no bearing on the 2016 election.

"I'm not guilty your honour. I couldn't have robbed the bank in December 2016 on the Gold Coast. In April 2014 I was in Tasmania". Cheesy

Back to top

IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: Journalists exposes voter fraud conspiracy
Reply #52 - Jan 31^st, 2017 at 5:27pm

lee wrote on Jan 31^st, 2017 at 5:22pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 31^st, 2017 at 5:13pm:

It has been tested MULTIPLE TIMES.

Correction. It has been tested multiple times in the past. That has no bearing on the 2016 election.

"I'm not guilty your honour. I couldn't have robbed the bank in December 2016 on the Gold Coast. In April 2014 I was in Tasmania". Cheesy

you are a dick of the order of peccahead.

But you just prove what kind of dimwitted, morally corrupt fools support Trump.

May trump destroy something you like. After all, the chances are good.

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

NorthOfNorth

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 17258
Gender: male

Re: Journalists exposes voter fraud conspiracy
Reply #53 - Jan 31^st, 2017 at 5:34pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 31^st, 2017 at 5:27pm:

lee wrote on Jan 31^st, 2017 at 5:22pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 31^st, 2017 at 5:13pm:

It has been tested MULTIPLE TIMES.

Correction. It has been tested multiple times in the past. That has no bearing on the 2016 election.

"I'm not guilty your honour. I couldn't have robbed the bank in December 2016 on the Gold Coast. In April 2014 I was in Tasmania". Cheesy

you are a dick of the order of peccahead.

But you just prove what kind of dimwitted, morally corrupt fools support Trump.

May trump destroy something you like. After all, the chances are good.

I think you're being trolled...

Back to top

Conviction is the art of being certain

IP Logged

lee

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 20194
Gender: male

Re: Journalists exposes voter fraud conspiracy
Reply #54 - Jan 31^st, 2017 at 5:41pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 31^st, 2017 at 5:27pm:

But you just prove what kind of dimwitted, morally corrupt fools support Trump.

But it is in the same league as claiming past multiple searches for fraud, and finding limited fraud, mean that 2016 fraud did not happen, or is minimal at best.

I am sorry you do not comprehend. I should remember your comprehension issues.

Back to top

IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: Journalists exposes voter fraud conspiracy
Reply #55 - Jan 31^st, 2017 at 6:19pm

NorthOfNorth wrote on Jan 31^st, 2017 at 5:34pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 31^st, 2017 at 5:27pm:

lee wrote on Jan 31^st, 2017 at 5:22pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 31^st, 2017 at 5:13pm:

It has been tested MULTIPLE TIMES.

Correction. It has been tested multiple times in the past. That has no bearing on the 2016 election.

"I'm not guilty your honour. I couldn't have robbed the bank in December 2016 on the Gold Coast. In April 2014 I was in Tasmania". Cheesy

you are a dick of the order of peccahead.

But you just prove what kind of dimwitted, morally corrupt fools support Trump.

May trump destroy something you like. After all, the chances are good.

I think you're being trolled...

not sure. He seems awfully besotted with Trump. Not sure too many trolls have a stomach for that. He is the real thing.

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: Journalists exposes voter fraud conspiracy
Reply #56 - Jan 31^st, 2017 at 6:29pm

lee wrote on Jan 31^st, 2017 at 5:41pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 31^st, 2017 at 5:27pm:

But you just prove what kind of dimwitted, morally corrupt fools support Trump.

But it is in the same league as claiming past multiple searches for fraud, and finding limited fraud, mean that 2016 fraud did not happen, or is minimal at best.

I am sorry you do not comprehend. I should remember your comprehension issues.

The scientific method that you love to proclaim so loud, does exactly that. After umpteen experiments (elections) with an incredibly low error-rate, the reasonable assumption is that the latest iteration has the same result. We do not experiment endlessly. After a while we discover that we can replicate the experiment as often as we want with near-identical results. We've set out criteria that can falsify the experiment and the undeniable conclusion is that there is an extremely small amount of voter fraud that is negligible and immaterial to the outcome.

We call it the Scientific Method.

You call it... whatever you need it to be to meet your desired outcomes.

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

lee

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 20194
Gender: male

Re: Journalists exposes voter fraud conspiracy
Reply #57 - Jan 31^st, 2017 at 6:45pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 31^st, 2017 at 6:29pm:

The scientific method that you love to proclaim so loud, does exactly that. After umpteen experiments (elections) with an incredibly low error-rate, the reasonable assumption is that the latest iteration has the same result. We do not experiment endlessly. After a while we discover that we can replicate the experiment as often as we want with near-identical results. We've set out criteria that can falsify the experiment and the undeniable conclusion is that there is an extremely small amount of voter fraud that is negligible and immaterial to the outcome.

We call it the Scientific Method.

lol. You are Fkken ridiculous. The reason they don't experiment endlessly in science is because the results won't generally change, unless there is an outside influence, which if known, will lead to a new experiment.

In voter fraud there is always an outside influence. Now you are using a low error-rate as an excuse for voter fraud? A low error-rate would be a mistake in the counting. Fraud isn't an error, it is a deliberate attempt to do something.

Back to top

IP Logged