Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 ... 8
Send Topic Print
Technically speaking they're not 'indigenous' (Read 10585 times)
Lord Herbert
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 34441
Gender: male
Technically speaking they're not 'indigenous'
Jan 20th, 2017 at 5:41am
 
Here we go again with this pretentious nonsense where their overwhelmingly dominant white genes are simply ignored like that poor Elephant-in-the-Room who nobody wants to acknowledge for fear of an Andrew Bolt court case.

When will they ever grow up and stop sucking on this delusional Victimhood tit that is like a cancer with these people?

"Enough already", as the Americans would say.

Navel-gazing neurotics.

_________________

*Navel-gazing:

Self-indulgent or excessive contemplation of oneself or a single issue, at the expense of a wider view.
   
"He lapsed into his customary navel-gazing".

__________________


link
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
AuntieM
Senior Member
****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 444
Gender: female
Re: Technically speaking they're not 'indigenous'
Reply #1 - Jan 20th, 2017 at 6:04am
 
?
He looks white.  I presume he's actually recognized by an indigenous group as a member, and not just pretending to be, like our Fauxcahontas (Warren)?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Lord Herbert
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 34441
Gender: male
Re: Technically speaking they're not 'indigenous'
Reply #2 - Jan 20th, 2017 at 7:15am
 
AuntieM wrote on Jan 20th, 2017 at 6:04am:
?
He looks white.  I presume he's actually recognized by an indigenous group as a member, and not just pretending to be, like our Fauxcahontas (Warren)?


They've both got a little tar in their blood, but feature-wise they are obviously way more of European background than indigenous.

My grandfather on my father's side was 100% German, and my Grandmother on my mother's side was 100% French.

How would it look if I entered the House of Reps in Canberra promoting myself - (with a straight face) - as 'German' ... or 'French' - ?

Answer: plurry rediculous.

This bullshit should actually be legislated against to stop this silly farce being repeated by others.

Here's the address of the people who can tell you where you really come from as a majority:

link

Enough with this childish nonsense.

If they have the courage of their conviction, then they shouldn't be afraid to take the DNA test and publish it.

Poll ...

Would they be happy to do this?

1) Oh Hell yes!

2) er, no.

3) Buckley's.

4) and Hell will freeze over first.

There's more Victimhood kudos to be had by sticking with the "I'm an aborigine" wank.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Jan 20th, 2017 at 7:28am by Lord Herbert »  
 
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 44679
Re: Technically speaking they're not 'indigenous'
Reply #3 - Jan 21st, 2017 at 3:55pm
 
But Herbie, we know from your own admission you're actually Chinese!   Tsk, tsk, trying to masquerade as a European.   Naughty, naughty!

In reality, "race" is a social construct.   Stan Grant is 50% Indigenous.  Thats 50% more than you.   Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

It seems that I have upset a Moderator and are forbidden from using memes. So much for Freedom of Speech. Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Raven
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 2982
Around
Re: Technically speaking they're not 'indigenous'
Reply #4 - Jan 21st, 2017 at 9:11pm
 
Lord Herbert wrote on Jan 20th, 2017 at 5:41am:
Here we go again with this pretentious nonsense where their overwhelmingly dominant white genes are simply ignored like that poor Elephant-in-the-Room who nobody wants to acknowledge for fear of an Andrew Bolt court case.

When will they ever grow up and stop sucking on this delusional Victimhood tit that is like a cancer with these people?

"Enough already", as the Americans would say.

Navel-gazing neurotics.

_________________

*Navel-gazing:

Self-indulgent or excessive contemplation of oneself or a single issue, at the expense of a wider view.
   
"He lapsed into his customary navel-gazing".

__________________


link


He is recognised by the wider aboriginal community as indigenous Herb, who are we to deny his aboriginalty.

Raven has a an Aboriginal friend who is as white as he is. The only white blood he has is a Dutch grandfather. He was raised within the aboriginal community by aboriginal parents. Yet there are people who look at him as a fraud, pretending to be aboriginal to get all this "free" stuff that aboriginal people supposedly receive.

If you identify as an aboriginal and are recognised by the wider aboriginal community as aboriginal, then that's what you are.
Back to top
 

Quoth the Raven "Nevermore"

Raven would rather ask questions that may never be answered, then accept answers which must never be questioned.
 
IP Logged
 
rhino
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17179
Gender: male
Re: Technically speaking they're not 'indigenous'
Reply #5 - Jan 21st, 2017 at 9:15pm
 
Brian Ross wrote on Jan 21st, 2017 at 3:55pm:


In reality, "race" is a social construct.   Stan Grant is 50% Indigenous.  
so hes indigenous but only socially.  Grin Grin Grin Grin
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Lord Herbert
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 34441
Gender: male
Re: Technically speaking they're not 'indigenous'
Reply #6 - Jan 22nd, 2017 at 7:49am
 
Raven wrote on Jan 21st, 2017 at 9:11pm:
He is recognised by the wider aboriginal community as indigenous Herb, who are we to deny his aboriginalty.


Hold it right THERE, Raven!

'Honorary aborigine' I will accept, just as universities are in the habit of handing out honorary doctorates like boiled bullseyes and humbugs to clueless individuals who nevertheless make handsome donations, or who make all the right Leftwing-Luvvie noises on the ABC and other Far Left media outlets.

But otherwise you can't simply whimsically decide that someone with 1/20th aborigine or Eskimo or Hottentot blood is henceforth the genuine article and is to be regarded as a fair dinkum indigenous Australian, Eskimo, or Hottentot. The criteria is a little more demanding than that, and involves the science of DNA profiling and ethnology.

And who are we to call "BULLSHIT!" on pretentious falsehoods? When falsehoods are paraded as The Truth, then it becomes a slippery slope to more and greater mischief.


Raven wrote on Jan 21st, 2017 at 9:11pm:
Raven has a an Aboriginal friend who is as white as he is. The only white blood he has is a Dutch grandfather. He was raised within the aboriginal community by aboriginal parents. Yet there are people who look at him as a fraud, pretending to be aboriginal to get all this "free" stuff that aboriginal people supposedly receive.

If you identify as an aboriginal and are recognised by the wider aboriginal community as aboriginal, then that's what you are.


Wrong.

Paul Keating is no more a 'Doctor of Letters' than I am, simply because a bunch of kiss-ass university bureaucrats wanted to flatter him for some more donations and for being a Canberra lobbyist for them.

Your Dutch friend is obviously way more European than indigenous, but so as not to seem ungrateful and rejecting of his aboriginal step-parents he plays along with the 'narrative' of being an aborigine. I can understand him doing that, but it still doesn't make it true.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Raven
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 2982
Around
Re: Technically speaking they're not 'indigenous'
Reply #7 - Jan 22nd, 2017 at 3:08pm
 
Lord Herbert wrote on Jan 22nd, 2017 at 7:49am:
Your Dutch friend is obviously way more European than indigenous, but so as not to seem ungrateful and rejecting of his aboriginal step-parents he plays along with the 'narrative' of being an aborigine. I can understand him doing that, but it still doesn't make it true.


He doesn't have step parents Herb, he was raised by his biological parents one of whoms  father was a white man.

It happens sometimes, a genetic throwback.

Back to top
 

Quoth the Raven "Nevermore"

Raven would rather ask questions that may never be answered, then accept answers which must never be questioned.
 
IP Logged
 
miketrees
Moderator
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6490
Gender: male
Re: Technically speaking they're not 'indigenous'
Reply #8 - Jan 22nd, 2017 at 3:34pm
 



(tattoos Wagyle on forehead)

brudda
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Lord Herbert
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 34441
Gender: male
Re: Technically speaking they're not 'indigenous'
Reply #9 - Jan 22nd, 2017 at 5:34pm
 
Raven wrote on Jan 22nd, 2017 at 3:08pm:
Lord Herbert wrote on Jan 22nd, 2017 at 7:49am:
Your Dutch friend is obviously way more European than indigenous, but so as not to seem ungrateful and rejecting of his aboriginal step-parents he plays along with the 'narrative' of being an aborigine. I can understand him doing that, but it still doesn't make it true.


He doesn't have step parents Herb, he was raised by his biological parents one of whoms  father was a white man.

It happens sometimes, a genetic throwback.



His father was a white man and his mother was part-aboriginal, and what this means is that he was genetically 3/4 white and only 1/4 Koorie.

My father never presenting himself as German, and my mother never presented herself as French, and both spoke Russian, while my mother also spoke French, and my father also spoke fluent Mandarin. But they didn't play silly-buggers with calling themselves anything other than 'English'.

But okay, Raven, we'll say your friend is unofficially 'indigenous' and leave it at that, but if he started parading himself in our Canberra parliament as officially 'indigenous', then I would have to call 'bullshit' on that.

Goebbels: "The bigger the lie, the more the people will believe you".   
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Raven
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 2982
Around
Re: Technically speaking they're not 'indigenous'
Reply #10 - Jan 22nd, 2017 at 6:14pm
 
Herbert read carefully.

His mother is aboriginal and his father had an aboriginal mother and a Dutch father.

The only white blood he has comes from this grandfather.

Back to top
 

Quoth the Raven "Nevermore"

Raven would rather ask questions that may never be answered, then accept answers which must never be questioned.
 
IP Logged
 
miketrees
Moderator
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6490
Gender: male
Re: Technically speaking they're not 'indigenous'
Reply #11 - Jan 22nd, 2017 at 6:19pm
 



It will never happen, but our geneticists could set a standard for who is and who isn't diginus
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
kemal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 613
Gender: male
Re: Technically speaking they're not 'indigenous'
Reply #12 - Jan 22nd, 2017 at 6:38pm
 
Brian Ross wrote on Jan 21st, 2017 at 3:55pm:
But Herbie, we know from your own admission you're actually Chinese!   Tsk, tsk, trying to masquerade as a European.   Naughty, naughty!

In reality, "race" is a social construct.   Stan Grant is 50% Indigenous.  Thats 50% more than you.   Roll Eyes

And Brian Dross is 50% d ick h ead and 50% f Vck wit so we are able to glean from this you are 100% idiot!
Back to top
 

Brian Ross on why Muslims kill Quote:-" It appears to be a cultural thing, rather than something they have learnt from their religion, despite what you appear to believe."
 
IP Logged
 
kemal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 613
Gender: male
Re: Technically speaking they're not 'indigenous'
Reply #13 - Jan 22nd, 2017 at 6:40pm
 
kemal wrote on Jan 22nd, 2017 at 6:38pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Jan 21st, 2017 at 3:55pm:
But Herbie, we know from your own admission you're actually Chinese!   Tsk, tsk, trying to masquerade as a European.   Naughty, naughty!

In reality, "race" is a social construct.   Stan Grant is 50% Indigenous.  Thats 50% more than you.   Roll Eyes

And Brian Dross is 50% d ick h ead and 50% f Vck wit so we are able to glean from this you are 100% idiot!


NOTE NO!!!!! SMILIES as only dickheads use them!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Back to top
 

Brian Ross on why Muslims kill Quote:-" It appears to be a cultural thing, rather than something they have learnt from their religion, despite what you appear to believe."
 
IP Logged
 
Lord Herbert
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 34441
Gender: male
Re: Technically speaking they're not 'indigenous'
Reply #14 - Jan 22nd, 2017 at 7:13pm
 
Raven wrote on Jan 22nd, 2017 at 6:14pm:
Herbert read carefully.

His mother is aboriginal and his father had an aboriginal mother and a Dutch father.

The only white blood he has comes from this grandfather.



"His mother is aboriginal" ... that can mean anything nowadays, and you would know that it is illegal for a person in the radio or print industry to use the term 'part-aborigine'.

I don't at all mind him being 100% aboriginal in his genetic heritage, or 51% aboriginal - but it's not a matter of whimsy and choice. I just don't like people swanning around arbitrarily claiming to be aborigine because it happens to suit their agenda.

The person I loved second only to my mother was a Chinese woman from north China who us kids regarded as our second mother. 
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 ... 8
Send Topic Print