Australian Politics Forum - Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Reply #285 - Jan 11^th, 2017 at 3:44pm

... wrote on Jan 11^th, 2017 at 3:30pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 11^th, 2017 at 3:28pm:

... wrote on Jan 11^th, 2017 at 3:21pm:

Take away california and Trump won the popular vote by 1.4million.

Take away my uncle's balls, and he'd be my aunt.

The truth is, Clinton won the popular vote ... comfortably.

American voters are not getting the POTUS they wanted.

That's nice, but you will note I was responding to someone who didn't believe he won most of the counties in the country, which he did.

What part of that did you feel warranted the response you gave?

No, I would like to see a US govt official tally that confirms this ludicrous claim. Statistcially alone, it would be difficult to win virtually every county and still lose the popular vote by such an enormous margin.

IN essence, I dont believe you.

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

lee Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 20570 Gender:	Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump Reply #286 - Jan 11^th, 2017 at 3:45pm greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 11^th, 2017 at 3:28pm: Take away my uncle's balls, and he'd be my aunt. Or simply a cock n a frock.
Back to top	« Last Edit: Jan 11^th, 2017 at 4:15pm by lee » IP Logged

Mr Hammer Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 25212 Gender:	Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump Reply #287 - Jan 11^th, 2017 at 3:45pm One thing about do-gooders like Streep is they have heart bursts where they start blubbering. You almost start to believe that flowers and unicorns are going to start flying out of her asshole. They aren't in the real world. Too spoilt, too detached and too egotistical.
Back to top	IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 152070
Gender: male

Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Reply #288 - Jan 11^th, 2017 at 3:45pm

lee wrote on Jan 11^th, 2017 at 3:43pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 11^th, 2017 at 3:40pm:

lee wrote on Jan 11^th, 2017 at 3:39pm:

" ... Hillary Clinton won the popular vote by at least 2.5 million votes..."

http://www.theepochtimes.com/n3/2193047-latest-numbers-on-the-election/

An arse kicking

Indeed.

She did well.

Indeed, I didn't think she would get 443 counties.

And win the popular vote.

She did, though: she won the popular vote ... comfortably.

Just like I always predicted.

Back to top

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles

IP Logged

Mr Hammer Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 25212 Gender:	Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump Reply #289 - Jan 11^th, 2017 at 3:45pm rhino wrote on Jan 11^th, 2017 at 3:34pm: Peccas having another one of his episodes. miam.
Back to top	IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Reply #290 - Jan 11^th, 2017 at 3:48pm

lee wrote on Jan 11^th, 2017 at 3:39pm:

"While Hillary Clinton won the popular vote by at least 2.5 million votes, Trump won more than 2,700 out of 3,143 counties across the United States."

http://www.theepochtimes.com/n3/2193047-latest-numbers-on-the-election/

An arse kicking

A problem here might be the assumption that counties have any similarities to electorates we have here with their new-equal populations. for example. to quote from your own link...

Meanwhile, the Brookings Institute think tank said that the 420 counties that Clinton won generated 64 percent of America’s economic activity in 2015, and the 2,600-or-so counties Trump took generated a mere 36 percent.

in other words, the counties where people actually LIVE in significant numbers voted for Clinton.

It is an interesting statistic but is about as worthless as it gets.

Obama won in a landslide in 2008 and yet apparently only won 22% of the counties. that pretty much underlines the worthless nature of this fact.

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

lee Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 20570 Gender:	Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump Reply #291 - Jan 11^th, 2017 at 3:48pm greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 11^th, 2017 at 3:45pm: Just like I always predicted. Nope. You bet she would win the election; not the popular vote. She lost the election.
Back to top	IP Logged

longweekend58 Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 45675 Gender:	Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump Reply #292 - Jan 11^th, 2017 at 3:50pm Last laugh belongs to the Democrats. Latest news is that Russia has BLACKMAIL information on Trump and will use it. Wait until the hammer and scythe flag flies over much of Europe.
Back to top	AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..." IP Logged

greggerypeccary Gold Member Online Australian Politics Posts: 152070 Gender:	Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump Reply #293 - Jan 11^th, 2017 at 3:51pm longweekend58 wrote on Jan 11^th, 2017 at 3:50pm: Latest news is that Russia has BLACKMAIL information on Trump and will use it. Excellent! The orange douche-bag, in an orange jumpsuit. This is gonna be so good.
Back to top	GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles IP Logged

lee Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 20570 Gender:	Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump Reply #294 - Jan 11^th, 2017 at 3:53pm longweekend58 wrote on Jan 11^th, 2017 at 3:48pm: A problem here might be the assumption that counties have any similarities to electorates we have here with their new-equal populations. for example. to quote from your own link... Who made any assumption on counties and population size?
Back to top	IP Logged

...

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 23673
WA
Gender: male

Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Reply #295 - Jan 11^th, 2017 at 3:53pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 11^th, 2017 at 3:44pm:

... wrote on Jan 11^th, 2017 at 3:30pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 11^th, 2017 at 3:28pm:

... wrote on Jan 11^th, 2017 at 3:21pm:

Take away california and Trump won the popular vote by 1.4million.

Take away my uncle's balls, and he'd be my aunt.

The truth is, Clinton won the popular vote ... comfortably.

American voters are not getting the POTUS they wanted.

That's nice, but you will note I was responding to someone who didn't believe he won most of the counties in the country, which he did.

What part of that did you feel warranted the response you gave?

No, I would like to see a US govt official tally that confirms this ludicrous claim. Statistcially alone, it would be difficult to win virtually every county and still lose the popular vote by such an enormous margin.

IN essence, I dont believe you.

If you won't believe me, believe your own eyes:

http://time.com/4587866/donald-trump-election-map/

Not much blue on that map, is there?

Back to top

electoral_map.PNG (174 KB | )

In the fullness of time...

IP Logged

lee Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 20570 Gender:	Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump Reply #296 - Jan 11^th, 2017 at 3:55pm longweekend58 wrote on Jan 11^th, 2017 at 3:50pm: Last laugh belongs to the Democrats. Latest news is that Russia has BLACKMAIL information on Trump and will use it. Wait until the hammer and scythe flag flies over much of Europe. Oh No. The very Democratic Snopes.
Back to top	IP Logged

...

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 23673
WA
Gender: male

Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Reply #297 - Jan 11^th, 2017 at 3:55pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 11^th, 2017 at 3:44pm:

... wrote on Jan 11^th, 2017 at 3:30pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 11^th, 2017 at 3:28pm:

... wrote on Jan 11^th, 2017 at 3:21pm:

Take away california and Trump won the popular vote by 1.4million.

Take away my uncle's balls, and he'd be my aunt.

The truth is, Clinton won the popular vote ... comfortably.

American voters are not getting the POTUS they wanted.

That's nice, but you will note I was responding to someone who didn't believe he won most of the counties in the country, which he did.

What part of that did you feel warranted the response you gave?

No, I would like to see a US govt official tally that confirms this ludicrous claim. Statistcially alone, it would be difficult to win virtually every county and still lose the popular vote by such an enormous margin.

IN essence, I dont believe you.

If you won't believe me, believe your own eyes:

http://time.com/4587866/donald-trump-election-map/

Not much blue on that map, is there?

Back to top

electoral_map_001.PNG (174 KB | 15 )

In the fullness of time...

IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Reply #298 - Jan 11^th, 2017 at 4:22pm

... wrote on Jan 11^th, 2017 at 3:53pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 11^th, 2017 at 3:44pm:

... wrote on Jan 11^th, 2017 at 3:30pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 11^th, 2017 at 3:28pm:

... wrote on Jan 11^th, 2017 at 3:21pm:

Take away california and Trump won the popular vote by 1.4million.

Take away my uncle's balls, and he'd be my aunt.

The truth is, Clinton won the popular vote ... comfortably.

American voters are not getting the POTUS they wanted.

That's nice, but you will note I was responding to someone who didn't believe he won most of the counties in the country, which he did.

What part of that did you feel warranted the response you gave?

No, I would like to see a US govt official tally that confirms this ludicrous claim. Statistcially alone, it would be difficult to win virtually every county and still lose the popular vote by such an enormous margin.

IN essence, I dont believe you.

If you won't believe me, believe your own eyes:

http://time.com/4587866/donald-trump-election-map/

Not much blue on that map, is there?

And yet she won the popular vote. So how can that be possible? She also won states that the map has almost entirely red. How is that possible? BECAUSE counties are about as meaningless as it gets. There are large red areas with a population of 200 and tiny blue areas with a population of 20,000.

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

TheFunPolice

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 9009
waggawagga
Gender: male

Re: Meryl Streep's awesome hypocrisy about Trump
Reply #299 - Jan 11^th, 2017 at 4:33pm

Jovial Monk wrote on Jan 10^th, 2017 at 1:09pm:

Big deal.

Great speech by Streep. Trump is not fit for the highest office in the land.

I haven't read the copy: yes, I am THAT lazy: but the broad can eat me!

She is over-rated because Hollywood is stagnation personified.

Trump may not be qualified but look at the world around him: are the media qualified? Is democracy itself qualified?

Greed is abundant and to say Meryl Streep has less of a grasp of that reality than Donald Trump beguiles me: what's her postcode, for instance?

Back to top

......Australia has an illegitimate Government!

IP Logged