Australian Politics Forum - The Great Writing Challenge

Aussie Gold Member Offline OzPolitic Posts: 39777 Gender:	Re: The Great Writing Challenge Reply #165 - Jan 3^rd, 2017 at 10:41pm My point is that Humbert was a paedophile, and that book/movie makes the precedent that a piece on paedophilia will not land anyone in jail. I guess I need to type slower for idiots.
Back to top	IP Logged

Big Donger

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 102454

Re: The Great Writing Challenge
Reply #166 - Jan 3^rd, 2017 at 10:44pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 3^rd, 2017 at 10:10pm:

Aussie wrote on Jan 3^rd, 2017 at 8:41pm:

Agnes wrote on Jan 3^rd, 2017 at 8:35pm:

Karnal seeing as how some pp do feel a bit strange about it another topic would be more readily acceptable.. there are so many after all.

The threshold problem we have have here is that Karnal is happy to write on any subject. Melielongtime is not, as he wants to select his own, one he is comfortable with. Odd position for a 'writer' to take but there ya go.

how would you know since he has never written on ANY topic?

Sorry, Longy, have you posted any examples of your own writing on this board? Ever?

I'm curious. No one would post their work on any other forum than the General board, as you know. Writing needs to be in the appropriate forum as you contend.

I'm sorry, I don't make the rules here, dear.

Back to top

IP Logged

Agnes

Gold Member

Offline

fish dinner

Posts: 6081
Bedford Park rnd

Re: The Great Writing Challenge
Reply #167 - Jan 3^rd, 2017 at 10:45pm

John Smith wrote on Jan 3^rd, 2017 at 10:37pm:

Agnes wrote on Jan 3^rd, 2017 at 10:34pm:

John Smith wrote on Jan 3^rd, 2017 at 10:33pm:

Agnes wrote on Jan 3^rd, 2017 at 10:27pm:

A quick look at the definition does not link to pedophilia..just weird kind of sexual fetishes/acts

Paraphilia

Paraphilia (also known as sexual perversion and sexual deviation) is the experience of intense sexual arousal to atypical objects, fetishes, situations, fantasies, behaviors, or individuals

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paraphilia

pretty sure it includes pedophillia ...

I'm sure lonstupidone will admit that at least, even if it will pain him to do so. Grin

you are an asshole and you should be a regular on PA..

that's the gratitude I get for for my taking time out to educate you?

Next time I'll leave you to wallow in your ignorance.

there is nothing you can teach me ..

Back to top

x=^..^= x <o((((>< ~~~ x=^..^=x~~~x=^..^=x<o((((><~~~x=^..^=x

farewell to days of wild abandon and freedom in the adriatic

IP Logged

rhino

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 17179
Gender: male

Re: The Great Writing Challenge
Reply #168 - Jan 3^rd, 2017 at 10:47pm

Aussie wrote on Jan 3^rd, 2017 at 10:41pm:

My point is that Humbert was a paedophile, and that book/movie makes the precedent that a piece on paedophilia will not land anyone in jail. I guess I need to type slower for idiots.

No one made the proposition that writing about pedophilia would land you in jail. You are also aware of course that legal precedent differs between countries. Of course, i forgot you were an ex lawyer.

Back to top

IP Logged

Big Donger

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 102454

Re: The Great Writing Challenge
Reply #169 - Jan 3^rd, 2017 at 10:48pm

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 3^rd, 2017 at 10:14pm:

Aussie wrote on Jan 3^rd, 2017 at 10:00pm:

John Smith wrote on Jan 3^rd, 2017 at 9:56pm:

Aussie wrote on Jan 3^rd, 2017 at 9:54pm:

John Smith wrote on Jan 3^rd, 2017 at 9:47pm:

Mistress Nicole wrote on Jan 3^rd, 2017 at 9:07pm:

John Smith wrote on Jan 3^rd, 2017 at 8:36pm:

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 3^rd, 2017 at 8:19pm:

try posting child porn and you will be arrested and not given bail very quickly

no one has asked you to post child porn you dickhead. Cheesy

No, but he's being asked to defend it. Besides the risk, I wouldn't argue in its favour on principle.

this is a guy who has supposedly written and published a book defending pedophilia ... I doubt child porn would be to much of a stretch for him

Now, I'm lost!

Embarrassed

longie has often cited that he's a published and well reputed author on pedophilia and how it is normal.

Well...if you say so. But, I'm not buying crap so easily or quietly in 2017.

Well while it is obviously completely untrue you need to remember that it is JS who has a struggle at the best of times understanding what people are saying. So when I say that I am a thrice-published author on a PARAphilia, he naturally reads that as the closet word he can find in his 100-word vocabulary. Basically he is an ignorant retard, if you havent already worked that out long before now..

Did you publish it on the General board, or in Relationships?

Sorry, Longy, that doesn't count - except to the police perhaps.

Take him away, officer. Longy just confessed to publishing pornography.

Back to top

IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 39777
Gender: male

Re: The Great Writing Challenge
Reply #170 - Jan 3^rd, 2017 at 10:51pm

rhino wrote on Jan 3^rd, 2017 at 10:47pm:

Aussie wrote on Jan 3^rd, 2017 at 10:41pm:

My point is that Humbert was a paedophile, and that book/movie makes the precedent that a piece on paedophilia will not land anyone in jail. I guess I need to type slower for idiots.

No one made the proposition that writing about pedophilia would land you in jail. You are also aware of course that legal precedent differs between countries. Of course, i forgot you were an ex lawyer.

Yeas they have Whino. Hence this discussion. Ask Nicole Page 2016.

Back to top

IP Logged

Big Donger Gold Member Online Australian Politics Posts: 102454	Re: The Great Writing Challenge Reply #171 - Jan 3^rd, 2017 at 10:52pm John Smith wrote on Jan 3^rd, 2017 at 10:22pm: i stand corrected .... longie has published books on having sex with dogs, not kids. Actually, it was a speech on Rosa Parks Day - by a Swedish professor. He's that good.
Back to top	IP Logged

John Smith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 78311
Gender: male

Re: The Great Writing Challenge
Reply #172 - Jan 3^rd, 2017 at 11:09pm

Agnes wrote on Jan 3^rd, 2017 at 10:45pm:

John Smith wrote on Jan 3^rd, 2017 at 10:37pm:

Agnes wrote on Jan 3^rd, 2017 at 10:34pm:

John Smith wrote on Jan 3^rd, 2017 at 10:33pm:

Agnes wrote on Jan 3^rd, 2017 at 10:27pm:

A quick look at the definition does not link to pedophilia..just weird kind of sexual fetishes/acts

Paraphilia

Paraphilia (also known as sexual perversion and sexual deviation) is the experience of intense sexual arousal to atypical objects, fetishes, situations, fantasies, behaviors, or individuals

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paraphilia

pretty sure it includes pedophillia ...

I'm sure lonstupidone will admit that at least, even if it will pain him to do so. Grin

you are an asshole and you should be a regular on PA..

that's the gratitude I get for for my taking time out to educate you?

Next time I'll leave you to wallow in your ignorance.

there is nothing you can teach me ..

yet the previous comments prove you wrong. Roll Eyes

see, that was also lesson in eating humble pie Grin

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 90228 Proud Old White Australian Man Gender:	Re: The Great Writing Challenge Reply #173 - Jan 3^rd, 2017 at 11:35pm Good god! How quickly this strand has degenerated into degeneracy.... perhaps the discussion papers should be about any and every thing that is perverse... damn that's a lot of ground hog's wallow to cover....
Back to top	“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.” ― John Adams IP Logged

Big Donger

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 102454

Re: The Great Writing Challenge
Reply #174 - Jan 4^th, 2017 at 1:46am

You're right, Grappler.

Please stay on topic, everybody. We still need a topic and some contenders. It looks like paedophilia's out because Longy already published 3 articles on it.

How about the Virgin Mary? She was 12 when she married Joseph. And he was nearly 100.

What sort of philia is that, Longy?

I say we write about that. MotherofGodphilia, I think it's called. Immaculate Lolitas. The divine consecration.

Not that there's anything wrong with it.

Back to top

IP Logged

Lord Herbert

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 34441
Gender: male

Re: The Great Writing Challenge
Reply #175 - Jan 4^th, 2017 at 5:40am

longweekend58 wrote on Jan 3^rd, 2017 at 11:24am:

No experienced, semi-professional writer like myself is going to get sucked into a stupid, disorganised rabble like this where the whole purpose is to say that my work is A) plagiarised B) off-topic etc

C) Homophobic D) Islamophobic E) Xenophobic F) Ideologically 'unhelpful' G) Ideologically 'inappropriate' H) Bigotted I) etc etc ...

Back to top

IP Logged

Lord Herbert

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 34441
Gender: male

Re: The Great Writing Challenge
Reply #176 - Jan 4^th, 2017 at 5:50am

Big Donger wrote on Jan 4^th, 2017 at 1:46am:

You're right, Grappler.

Please stay on topic, everybody. We still need a topic and some contenders. It looks like paedophilia's out because Longy already published 3 articles on it.

How about the Virgin Mary? She was 12 when she married Joseph. And he was nearly 100.

What sort of philia is that, Longy?

I say we write about that. MotherofGodphilia, I think it's called. Immaculate Lolitas. The divine consecration.

Not that there's anything wrong with it.

In the bible it says that it was a dove that inseminated Mary, with meanwhile Joseph's only purpose was to complete the conventional picture of a man and his pregnant wife.

Back to top

IP Logged

mothra

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 36389
Gender: female

Re: The Great Writing Challenge
Reply #177 - Jan 4^th, 2017 at 8:15am

Lord Herbert wrote on Jan 4^th, 2017 at 5:50am:

Big Donger wrote on Jan 4^th, 2017 at 1:46am:

You're right, Grappler.

Please stay on topic, everybody. We still need a topic and some contenders. It looks like paedophilia's out because Longy already published 3 articles on it.

How about the Virgin Mary? She was 12 when she married Joseph. And he was nearly 100.

What sort of philia is that, Longy?

I say we write about that. MotherofGodphilia, I think it's called. Immaculate Lolitas. The divine consecration.

Not that there's anything wrong with it.

In the bible it says that it was a dove that inseminated Mary, with meanwhile Joseph's only purpose was to complete the conventional picture of a man and his pregnant wife.

Bestiality and paedophilia.

So much intrigue.

My vote is for the Immaculate Conception to be the topic.

Back to top

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.

IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: The Great Writing Challenge
Reply #178 - Jan 4^th, 2017 at 8:17am

Aussie wrote on Jan 3^rd, 2017 at 10:41pm:

My point is that Humbert was a paedophile, and that book/movie makes the precedent that a piece on paedophilia will not land anyone in jail. I guess I need to type slower for idiots.

Which only shows how much of a lawyer you WERENT. The book skirts the line and has been subject to massive debate and controversy and its continued existence owes much to is history as a part of the literary landscape. To pretend that you could do the same today and get away with it is a ludicrous as your claim to have ever had a legal education.

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged

longweekend58

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male

Re: The Great Writing Challenge
Reply #179 - Jan 4^th, 2017 at 8:18am

mothra wrote on Jan 4^th, 2017 at 8:15am:

Lord Herbert wrote on Jan 4^th, 2017 at 5:50am:

Big Donger wrote on Jan 4^th, 2017 at 1:46am:

You're right, Grappler.

Please stay on topic, everybody. We still need a topic and some contenders. It looks like paedophilia's out because Longy already published 3 articles on it.

How about the Virgin Mary? She was 12 when she married Joseph. And he was nearly 100.

What sort of philia is that, Longy?

I say we write about that. MotherofGodphilia, I think it's called. Immaculate Lolitas. The divine consecration.

Not that there's anything wrong with it.

In the bible it says that it was a dove that inseminated Mary, with meanwhile Joseph's only purpose was to complete the conventional picture of a man and his pregnant wife.

Bestiality and paedophilia.

So much intrigue.

My vote is for the Immaculate Conception to be the topic.

You mean the topic where the only person who will write is me? Since I am the only one (other than Gandalf) who ever writes like this, why would I let anyone tell me what the topic should be?

Back to top

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."

IP Logged