Dec 12th, 2016

Earlier today a federal judge threw out Jill Stein’s request to recount the votes in Pennsylvania. Stein’s request would have prevented Pennsylvania’s electoral votes from going to Donald Trump. The recount NEVER would have been completed on time.


Wow! Clinton Camp Wants Intelligence Briefing on Russia Before Electoral College Vote

Jim Hoft Dec 12th, 2016 2:38 pm 234 Comments
podesta-hillary

WOW! THEY WILL STOP AT NOTHING TO STEAL THE ELECTION!

Earlier today a federal judge threw out Jill Stein’s request to recount the votes in Pennsylvania. Stein’s request would have prevented Pennsylvania’s electoral votes from going to Donald Trump. The recount NEVER would have been completed on time.

Donald Trump won the state by over 40,000 votes.
Jill Stein placed fourth with less than 1% of the vote.

A federal judge shut down Stein’s push for a Michigan recount last week.

But the Clintons are not done yet.
Hillary’s top advisor John Podesta wants an intelligence briefing on Russia before the Electoral College vote on December 19th.
Politico reported:
The Politico reported:

Hillary Clinton’s top political adviser John Podesta said the campaign is supporting an effort by members of the Electoral College to request an intelligence briefing on foreign intervention in the presidential election.

“The bipartisan electors’ letter raises very grave issues involving our national security,” Podesta said in a statement Monday. “Electors have a solemn responsibility under the Constitution and we support their efforts to have their questions addressed.”

“Each day that month, our campaign decried the interference of Russia in our campaign and its evident goal of hurting our campaign to aid Donald Trump,” he said. “Despite our protestations, this matter did not receive the attention it deserved by the media in the campaign. We now know that the CIA has determined Russia’s interference in our elections was for the purpose of electing Donald Trump. This should distress every American.”

Podesta’s statement is the first public statement from the Clinton campaign raising questions about the legitimacy of Donald Trump’s victory.

It follows an open letter from 10 presidential electors — including Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi’s daughter Christine — requesting an intelligence briefing ahead of the Dec. 19 vote of the Electoral College.

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/12/wow-clinton-camp-wants-intelligence-brie...

Intelligence Officer Who Personally Met the Democratic Email Leaker Confirms Leaker Is with AMERICAN Intelligence Service … Not Russia

December 13, 2016

The former intelligence analyst, British Ambassador to Uzbekistan, and chancellor of the University of Dundee, Craig Murray, wrote yesterday:

    As Julian Assange has made crystal clear, the leaks did not come from the Russians. As I have explained countless times, they are not hacks, they are insider leaks – there is a major difference between the two.

    ***

    I know who leaked them. I’ve MET the person who leaked them, and they are certainly not Russian and it’s an insider. It’s a leak, not a hack; the two are different things.

In other words, Murray – a close friend of Julian Assange – says he knows for a fact that there were no hacks at all … instead, an American insider leaked the information to Wikileaks.

Today, Murray writes:

    If you set up the super surveillance state, hoovering up all the internet traffic of pretty well everybody, that is not just going to affect the ordinary people whom the elite despise. There is also going to be an awful lot of traffic intercepted from sleazy members of the elite connected to even the most senior politicians, revealing all their corruption and idiosyncracies. From people like John Podesta, to take an entirely random example. And once the super surveillance state has intercepted and stored all that highly incriminating material, you never know if some decent human being, some genuine patriot, from within the security services is going to feel compelled to turn whistleblower.

    Than they might turn for help to, to take another entirely random example, Julian Assange.

This confirms what the NSA executive who created the agency’s mass surveillance program for digital information, who served as the senior technical director within the agency, who managed six thousandNSA employees, the 36-year NSA veteran widely regarded as a “legend” within the agency and the NSA’s best-ever analyst and code-breaker, who mapped out the Soviet command-and-control structure before anyone else knew how, and so predicted Soviet invasions before they happened (“in the 1970s, he decrypted the Soviet Union’s command system, which provided the US and its allies with real-time surveillance of all Soviet troop movements and Russian atomic weapons”) – previously said:  the leaker was from U.S. intelligence services.

And see this.

And Murray confirmed to Washington’s Blog by email that Binney “was on the mark.”

In other words, Russia did not hack the Democratic party emails.  Instead, an American intelligence whistleblower leaked them.

It wouldn’t be the first time.

http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2016/08/nsa-whistleblower-nsa-hack-likely-inside-...

Update: David Swanson interviewed Murray today, and obtained additional information. Specifically, Murray told Swanson that: (1) there were two American leakers … one of the emails of the Democratic National Committee and one of the emails of top Clinton aide John Podesta; (2) Murray met one of those leakers; and (3) both leakers are American insiders with the NSA and/or the DNC, with no known connections to Russia.

And see this.

http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2016/12/64139.html

Postscript: As we’ve pointed out for years, the NSA is

collecting all digital communications

http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2013/10/security-expert-the-details-matter-less-a...– including emails- in America.

The NSA then shares this information with numerous other agencies, including the FBI, DEA, etc.

We’ve noted that the NSA’s big data collection itself

creates an easy mark for hackers

http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2013/07/another-problem-with-mass-spying-hackers-.... Remember, the Pentagon itself sees the collection of “big data” as a “national security threat” … but the NSA is the biggest data collector on the planet, and thus provides a tempting mother lode of information for foreign hackers.

And we’ve documented that the Obama administration has prosecuted more whistleblowers than

all other presidents combined.

http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2015/05/obama-has-sentenced-whistleblowers-to-31-...

It sounds like this witches brew of bad policy is what led to the Democratic email leaks from an insider in the American intelligence services.

But if anyone wants to try to prove Murray and Binney wrong, it should be easy to check.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/intelligence-officer-who-personally-met-the-democra...

NorthOfNorth wrote on Dec 14^th, 2016 at 12:17pm:

THE RUSSIAN HACKING TALE: ALL SIZZLE, NO STEAK

By Mike King

http://www.tomatobubble.com/id1077.html

bogarde73 wrote on Dec 14^th, 2016 at 1:21pm:


and WAY after that is hillary