he is getting very nervous..what does he have to hide?

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/12/trump-pennsylvania-recount-232103

Quote:

with all his blathering about "massive voter fraud" you'd think he would want every single vote in every single state hand-counted ...

right. So Trumps not allowed to play the game everyone else does?

Melanias purse wrote on Dec 2^nd, 2016 at 11:52pm:


The game is rigged but the election was not. Why is Trump wanting to halt a recount?

Mortdooley wrote on Dec 3^rd, 2016 at 1:12am:


Mortie, please give us evidence that the dead and illegal voted. The world is waiting ...

Sprintcyclist wrote on Dec 3^rd, 2016 at 3:59am:

How is it that you won? Did you vote as an American citizen? Or, as a non-citizen, did you vote illegally?

Stein/Clinton don't really want a recount, they want a stalled count in the hope the electoral votes are not included.
But that won't change anything. Trump still wins.
Get used to it snowflakes. Is it really worth it to put yourselves through all this angst and still lose?

bogarde73 wrote on Dec 3^rd, 2016 at 9:16am:

  They would not spend this much money Bog if there were not a serious doubt..no one would do that.. and why is Trump so nervous..I know Hillary is not everyone's favorite but if there has been fraud committed somewhere in the process it ought to be flushed out..Trump is guilty as sin..and while I don't expect a recount will deliver Clinton a victory I hope whatever deceit has been at work here is exposed..there are serious discrepancies here and electoral experts have picked up anomalies that stand out enough to warrant a 2nd look.. so lets see shall we..if they can prove fraud the election should be held again.

Sprintcyclist wrote on Dec 3^rd, 2016 at 3:59am:

what state in America  are you from Sprint lol North or South Island. ?

rhino wrote on Dec 3^rd, 2016 at 9:56am:



I did. Obama assaulted the working class and Trump will pick up where he left off.

Marla wrote on Dec 3^rd, 2016 at 10:01am:
yes, more than likely. Both are tools of the multi national corporations who run your country.

..

Agnes wrote on Dec 3^rd, 2016 at 10:45am:



Quote:


surely michigans voters should have representation via their electoral college votes

jill steins last minute rush to pervert the election should be thrown out of court

It wouldnt be a REpublican if it wasnt complaining about recounts - as in 2000.

But seriously, does anyone in Australia complain or take legal action AGAINST recounts? A hand recount is considered one of the basic protections against miscounts and are routinely done here if the margin is small. 

It reflects on the character of people that oppose free and open recounts. it smells of opposing democracy, honest and transparency. If I were trump I would take the opportunity to look magnanimous and Presidential but supporting the recount knowing there was .0001% chance anything would change. But then again, I am clearly a bit more generous and open than Herr Trump.

Agnes wrote on Dec 2^nd, 2016 at 9:49pm:


the complaint filed Thursday states. "There is no evidence -- or even an allegation -- that any tampering with Pennsylvania's voting systems actually occurred."..




The electronic vote was 7% different from the rest of the vote which makes it a mathematically improbable result statistically. While this can happen dependent on demographic it is clearly questionable.



For months Trump had been telling anyone and everyone that it was rigged, Mr Trump has clearly alleged that the vote was rigged.

FUNDING DRIES UP AS ANGRY, DISCOURAGED DONORS ABANDONING THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY IN DROVES
http://www.nowtheendbegins.com/funding-dries-discouraged-donors-abandon-democrat...



First Day Of Wisconsin Recount Results Are In And It's Horrible

Mortdooley wrote on Dec 3^rd, 2016 at 1:12am:


if that were true thrump lawyers would be demanding a recount, not trying to stop it

are all Americans this thick?

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/12/02/many-illegal-aliens-can-vote-...



A former immigration officer says many illegal aliens can vote in national elections, in part because they can easily buy fake identification documents.

“I probably arrested more than a thousand illegal aliens in my career,” retired ICE Special-Agent-In-Charge Claude Arnold said during an interview with Fox News’ Bill O’Reilly. “I routinely encounter people in possession of voter registration cards… I would ask them, ‘Do you or have you voted?’ And often, I would get the answer, yes,” he said, adding that about 100 illegals told him that they had voted.

Illegals can vote because they can get realistic fake documents, he said.

“The demand is so great for counterfeit documents because the illegal alien population wants to work—that’s the majority of their motivation for wanting to come to this country,” he said. “So there’s a huge demand for those documents that are required to pass the employment eligibility verification procedures,” he added.

“In every neighborhood where there’s a significant illegal alien population, there are at least several document vendors who supply this service.” Illegals typically buy fraudulent documents in threes, he continued: A counterfeit resident alien card or work authorization card, plus a counterfeit California driver’s license, and a counterfeit Social Security card, which costs about $120 to $300.

Arnold’s interview comes after President-elect Donald Trump declared he would would have won the popular vote if millions who voted illegally were discounted.

Democratic Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe, a longtime ally of Hillary Clinton, ignored his state’s supreme court ruling and illegally gave 60,000 felons voter registration cards. Also, at least eight million adult illegal aliens are residing in the United States in defiance of the law.

The media did not investigate these claims, automatically declaring them “false” with much outrage and finger-wagging. Still, voting experts have told reporters at the Daily Mail that it’s likely illegal aliens, non-citizens, and other ineligible people, did vote in significant numbers on Election Day:

    [E]xperts warn today that the rapid media condemnation of the president-elect is itself flawed—and that he was at the very least partially right in his claims.

    They said it is certain that—among other things—non-citizens were registered to vote and [did] cast ballots.

    It is also certain that there were other instances of illegal voting, including people who vote under false identities, and people who cast ballots in multiple states, which most attacks on Trump’s tweet chose to ignore, they warned…

    The most recent serious attempt to measure the number of non-citizen voters found that illegal voting is a widespread problem, although not as prevalent as Trump’s comments suggested.

    The 2013 study was conducted by Jesse Richman, a professor at Old Dominion University.

    The report was based on surveys by the Cooperative Congressional Election Studies in 2008 and 2010, which asked respondents for citizen status and whether they had voted.

    Based on the data, Richman estimated that 6.4 percent of non-citizens voted in the 2008 presidential election, which would translate to around 1.2 million votes. According to Richman, about 80 percent of these non-citizens voted for Barack Obama against John McCain.

    But the professor says his findings still wouldn’t account for Hillary Clinton’s entire 2.2 million lead against Trump in the popular vote.

These problems may have been compounded by the outgoing president himself. Days before the election, Obama gave an evasive response in a YouTube interview suggesting to his critics that any voter fraud committed by illegal aliens would not be prosecuted under his administration.

True The Vote, an organization dedicated to stopping voter fraud, strongly backed Trump’s claims about illegal voting.

“True the Vote absolutely supports President-elect Trump’s recent comment about the impact of illegal voting, as reflected in the national popular vote,” the group said in a statement. “We are still collecting data and will be for several months, but our intent is to publish a comprehensive study on the significant impact of illegal voting in all of its many forms and begin a national discussion on how voters, states, and the Trump Administration can best address this growing problem.”

I don't think these are Trump supporters.

Court rejected immediate stop of recount which continues and will be finished before the matter is decided in court.

Just as a matter of interest, errors are being found in the count like groups of votes and wards not being added to tally.

Count will be complete before there is a judgment in the suit against the recount.

http://elections.wi.gov/publications/statistics/recount/2016/12-1-spreadsheet

Unforgiven wrote on Dec 4^th, 2016 at 1:08am:

Hopefully Unforgiven..I dont see how this smacking senile bozo will get through a month let alonne 4 years..

Quote:


http://heavy.com/news/2016/12/wisconsin-recount-totals-update-day-2-3-1-returns-...