Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Michael T. Flynn - new National Security Adviser (Read 154 times)
Sprintcyclist
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 41324
Gender: male
Michael T. Flynn - new National Security Adviser
Nov 21st, 2016 at 6:07pm
 


Quote:
................he was pressed into retirement for questioning the Obama administration’s public narrative that Al Qaeda was close to defeat.[32]
Flynn told Seymour Hersh that his agency "had sent a constant stream of classified warnings ... about the dire consequences of toppling [Syrian President] Assad."
Flynn recounted that the Obama administration's efforts to arm "moderate" Syrian rebels benefited extremists such as Al-Nusra Front and the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant, stating: "If the American public saw the intelligence we were producing daily, at the most sensitive level, they would go ballistic."
According to former DIA official W. Patrick Lang: "Flynn incurred the wrath of the White House by insisting on telling the truth about Syria ... they shoved him out. He wouldn't shut up."[33]
In an interview with Al Jazeera, Flynn has criticized the Obama administration its delay in supporting rebels in Syria, thereby allowing for the growth of Al Nusra and other extremist forces: "when you don’t get in and help somebody, they’re gonna find other means to achieve their goals" and that "we should have done more earlier on in this effort, you know, than we did..............


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_T._Flynn
Back to top
 

Modern Classic Right Wing
 
IP Logged
 
issuevoter
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 9200
The Great State of Mind
Gender: male
Re: Michael T. Flynn - new National Security Adviser
Reply #1 - Nov 21st, 2016 at 6:18pm
 
The progressive humanist media like the NY Times, Guardian and the BBC are describing Flynn as a two headed fire breathing monster.

However, here is a quote from Wikipedia:

In May 2016, Flynn was asked by an Al Jazeera reporter if he would support Trump's stated plan to "take out [the] families" of suspected terrorists. In response, Flynn stated, "I would have to see the circumstances of that situation". In an interview with Al Jazeera, Flynn criticized the reliance on drones as a "failed strategy", stating that "what we have is this continued investment in conflict. The more weapons we give, the more bombs we drop, that just … fuels the conflict.”

That seems reasonable to me.
Back to top
 

No political allegiance. No philosophy. No religion.
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print