'1920’s Brit ‘fatally infected’ All Government Climate Models'

'A sensational new study shows western government climate models rely on a fatally flawed 1920’s algorithm.  Scientists say this could be the breakthrough that explains why modern computers are so awful at predicting climate change: simulations “violate several known Laws of Thermodynamics.”

British climate researcher Derek Alker presents an extraordinary new paper ‘Greenhouse Effect Theory within the UN IPCC Computer Climate Models – Is It A Sound Basis?’ exposing previously undetected errors that government climate researchers have unknowingly fed into multi-million dollar climate computers since the 1940s. [1]

Alker explains:

    “This paper examines what was originally calculated as the greenhouse effect theory by Lewis Fry Richardson, the brilliant English mathematician, physicist and meteorologist.

    In 1922 Richardson devised an innovative set of differential equations. His ingenious method is still used today in climate models. But unbeknown to Richardson he had inadvertently relied upon unchecked (and fatally flawed) numbers supplied by another well-known British scientist, W. H. Dines.”

Unfortunately, for Richardson Dines wrongly factored in that earth’s climate is driven by terrestrial (ground) radiation as the only energy source, not the sun. Richardson had taken the Dines numbers on face value and did not detect the error when combining the Dines numbers to his own. Alker continues: “The archives show Richardson never double-checked the Dines work (see below) and the records do not show that anyone else has ever exposed it.” '

http://climatechangedispatch.com/breaking-1920s-brit-fatally-infected-all-govern...

Read the full paper at principia-scientific.org

Jovial Monk wrote on Nov 17^th, 2016 at 6:19am:


So sad that your comprehension skills are so limited.

lee wrote on Nov 16^th, 2016 at 8:18pm:


So you are saying that the Sun has no effect on earth's climate?

Note not just variation of solar energy.

And then of course the the error bars on the model keep expanding, even after 40 years. The only way they can keep in touch with reality.

Jovial Monk wrote on Nov 17^th, 2016 at 4:25pm:


You sure are. Try reading the paper.

TheFunPolice wrote on Nov 17^th, 2016 at 5:22pm:



Is that what your on?

Jovial Monk wrote on Nov 17^th, 2016 at 5:50pm:


So you still haven't read the paper? Of course not; it doesn't agree with your preconceived ideas.

Jovial Monk wrote on Nov 17^th, 2016 at 6:29pm:


Are climate modellers,climate scientists? 

Denizen lee is off by a factor of 1000 in all his blatherings.

He recently posted that Australian householders pay $ 412.11 per kWh solar electricity subsidy.

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?action=post;num=1479172809;virboard=;quot...

There were some in the later 40s.

Lees is an idiot suggesting climate scientists know nothing about the flipping sun!

There were slide rules etc.

miketrees wrote on Nov 17^th, 2016 at 7:06pm:

Yup, climate scientists knowing NOTHING about the sun IS rather surprising to me!

I just reacted to the obvious crap in the “climate scientists leave out the sun” crap.

Jovial Monk wrote on Nov 17^th, 2016 at 8:04pm:



Thank you. your idiocy has brightened my day.

Quote:


So is Derek Alker claiming that there is no such thing as the Greenhouse effect?

I guess we'll just have to take Alker's word for it that William Henry Dines calculations were so fatally flawed, although it does seem odd that William Henry Dines is mostly famous for inventing Meteorological Instruments and taking measurements with them in the 19th century. I am also astonished that it has taken over 100 years for these "errors" to be found.

So what reputable scientific establishment published Derek Alker's paper?

Jovial Monk wrote on Nov 18^th, 2016 at 9:21am:



Thanks JM.

You have repeatedly shown what you know of AGW. "Plants are now growing in Antarctica because of AGW".

Jovial Monk wrote on Nov 18^th, 2016 at 11:33am:

The faux conservatives who are known haters even by their own family are now crying that everyone knows this: http://www.theverge.com/2016/11/17/13667630/global-sea-ice-concentration-graph-s...

** BEWARE THE PANIC I SAY 

("sun not included": gold,... hey i read in the letters to the editor that some bloke(let's say me, not me but let's just say for purpose(!) that will become apparent) was told ,... nah I forget: I'll get back to this letter later  )

{looks like a great little doggy there btw!!}

TheFunPolice wrote on Nov 18^th, 2016 at 11:38am:

Yup, great little dog and a good ratter. Had some great walks with her, the whole length of the Torrens Linear Park up to the Gorge Weir (built 1856) and aquaduct and the Pioneer Women Trail from Burnside to Hahndorf.

Jovial Monk wrote on Nov 18^th, 2016 at 12:00pm:

Hey, I thiink the letter sad: "They laughed when I said I wanted to be a comedian, but they aren't laughing now!"

Yeh, I suck  Oh well, um, d'oHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!

We've got a chihuahua hua... cos my brothers mad and married a mexican girl: you should see her eledest with a soccer ball and he's never played 

It's all true: i think I've told you all this so I will go now 

Chihuahuas are great little dogs! Before Demi we had Tiffany, a purebreed chi given to us because she had some minor defects and could not be shown.

A little dog, but always game for a long walk. At night she would be on your lap, chis are lapdogs. Yeah, lovely loyal loving dog is the chi.