'1920’s Brit ‘fatally infected’ All Government Climate Models'

'A sensational new study shows western government climate models rely on a fatally flawed 1920’s algorithm.  Scientists say this could be the breakthrough that explains why modern computers are so awful at predicting climate change: simulations “violate several known Laws of Thermodynamics.”

British climate researcher Derek Alker presents an extraordinary new paper ‘Greenhouse Effect Theory within the UN IPCC Computer Climate Models – Is It A Sound Basis?’ exposing previously undetected errors that government climate researchers have unknowingly fed into multi-million dollar climate computers since the 1940s. [1]

Alker explains:

    “This paper examines what was originally calculated as the greenhouse effect theory by Lewis Fry Richardson, the brilliant English mathematician, physicist and meteorologist.

    In 1922 Richardson devised an innovative set of differential equations. His ingenious method is still used today in climate models. But unbeknown to Richardson he had inadvertently relied upon unchecked (and fatally flawed) numbers supplied by another well-known British scientist, W. H. Dines.”

Unfortunately, for Richardson Dines wrongly factored in that earth’s climate is driven by terrestrial (ground) radiation as the only energy source, not the sun. Richardson had taken the Dines numbers on face value and did not detect the error when combining the Dines numbers to his own. Alker continues: “The archives show Richardson never double-checked the Dines work (see below) and the records do not show that anyone else has ever exposed it.” '

http://climatechangedispatch.com/breaking-1920s-brit-fatally-infected-all-govern...

Read the full paper at principia-scientific.org

Jovial Monk wrote on Nov 17^th, 2016 at 6:19am:


So sad that your comprehension skills are so limited.

lee wrote on Nov 16^th, 2016 at 8:18pm:


So you are saying that the Sun has no effect on earth's climate?

Note not just variation of solar energy.

And then of course the the error bars on the model keep expanding, even after 40 years. The only way they can keep in touch with reality.

Jovial Monk wrote on Nov 17^th, 2016 at 4:25pm:


You sure are. Try reading the paper.

TheFunPolice wrote on Nov 17^th, 2016 at 5:22pm:



Is that what your on?

Jovial Monk wrote on Nov 17^th, 2016 at 5:50pm:


So you still haven't read the paper? Of course not; it doesn't agree with your preconceived ideas.

Jovial Monk wrote on Nov 17^th, 2016 at 6:29pm:


Are climate modellers,climate scientists? 

Denizen lee is off by a factor of 1000 in all his blatherings.

He recently posted that Australian householders pay $ 412.11 per kWh solar electricity subsidy.

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?action=post;num=1479172809;virboard=;quot...

There were some in the later 40s.

Lees is an idiot suggesting climate scientists know nothing about the flipping sun!

There were slide rules etc.