Whew, that was a close one.

bogarde73 wrote on Nov 16^th, 2016 at 9:58am:


"sources", and anonymous Secret Service officers, says Breitbart.

Sounds legit to me, Bogie.

Phew!

Still got the party frock ready Agnes?

Put it away huh?

bogarde73 wrote on Nov 16^th, 2016 at 10:13am:



Awww don't be like that Bog.I had it made special, in blue your favourite color n' all.

Baronvonrort wrote on Nov 16^th, 2016 at 10:18am:


no, the ABC reported that all the polls showed Hillary would win.

Now, it's time for your enema again

Big sook ....


Reports: Clinton Had a Violent Meltdown on Election Night

http://www.thepoliticalinsider.com/hillary-drunk-violent-meltdown-election-night...

bogarde73 wrote on Nov 16^th, 2016 at 9:58am:


yes, it was close to WW III.

Hence the Russian parliament stood up and applauded when Trumps victory was reported.

What will Bogeyman do when Facebook begins cracking down on "fake news.?"

John Smith wrote on Nov 16^th, 2016 at 11:05am:


Indeed.

And then, when asked to cite a reference, they'll inevitably say "Find it yourself".

It's the two basic rules of rightardism:

1. make up lies

2. shift blame/responsibility

It's served Gordy, Bogie, Sprint, Hammer, Baron, et al. all these years.

Why stop now?

Only the Bubble Children, the precious snowflakes, have this need to be spoonfed with links, just like they can't survive without safe rooms, trigger warnings and platform denial.

Grown ups make do for themselves.

Run for the safe room kids, The Bogarde is loose.

bogarde73 wrote on Nov 16^th, 2016 at 11:32am:


arde has risen from the bog after laxative treatment.

it would not be surprising if this did occur.

The rightard must learn "emotional mastery" if he is to survive in business. 1000's of reference experiences teach him the "harsh reality" that business requires and indeed, demands, emotional mastery.

So Donald would have been forced to master his emotions or he would not have been able to ascend to his current position.

The situation is different for the intellectual elite.
They dont really learn from reference experiences because they dont get "frank and fearless feedback " from their customers.
They dont have customers, they just "vibe" with other leftards. There is no learning in such a rarified environment. We can see this on Ozpolitics...the leftards just pat each other on the back, nod in agreement and move on to the next piece of "bon homie".

No feedback, no harsh criticism= no learning = no growth = remaining always an emotional child prone to tantrums.  i would feel this is the mindset of the Hilary, this is the mindset of the union mob, this is the mindset of "occupy wall st", this is the mindset of "get up".this is the mindset of the "socialist alliance", this is the mindset of a meeting of green senators.  Harsh criticism cannot be taken and cannot be learnt from .
Leftards in america should be doing deep contemplative reflection on where they failed, so as to improve their performance in 4 years .Instead they are being overly emotional.  I can send them some self development books if they would like. But they just cant vibe with success. So much easier to vibe with animal instincts like anger and fear .
How sad 

Unforgiven wrote on Nov 16^th, 2016 at 11:34am:


Dick Sauce, perhaps?    

bogarde73 wrote on Nov 16^th, 2016 at 11:32am:


Hardly. Links give source from which we can establish its truth or otherwise. When you are making extravagant claims, links are the least you can provide.

Sprintcyclist wrote on Nov 16^th, 2016 at 12:52pm:


"Trump loses cool while Clinton stays calm during first presidential debate".

"Donald didn't agree and went on a very public Twitter temper tantrum ..."

longweekend58 wrote on Nov 16^th, 2016 at 12:59pm:


there is unfocused anger which is unhelpful and there is anger which is used as a tool to get yourself motivated.
You will see many successful people (very common with leaders of sporting teams or great coaches of sporting teams) use anger to "inspire".
i believe this is where trumps so-called "anger " fits. i dont see it as 'out of control' and 'unfocused".
i see it as directed towards a purpose and just one of the many tools in his tool box.

aquascoot wrote on Nov 16^th, 2016 at 1:17pm:



That is just stupid. Interrupting and calling someone a 'nasty woman' is not 'a tool'.

Wait until he nukes some country because he is using it to 'motivate'.

A more moderate report about Clinton's tantrum ...

https://spectator.org/where-was-hillary/

bogarde73 wrote on Nov 16^th, 2016 at 11:32am:

While people like yourself use weasel words like 'legal pundits' when what they really mean is 'the lawyers loose in the top paddock of my head'.

bogarde73 wrote on Nov 16^th, 2016 at 9:58am:



Yep! America dodged a bullet.

Most people thought that if she lost she would spit the dummy just as her supporters have done. She has a history of melt downs - she is certifiable and certainly not presidential material.

Trump will be the best president since Andrew Jackson. The Dow has reached an all time high and relations with Russia have relaxed. It was all media hysteria - the anti-Trumpers were in truth the ones who were conned.

Look what we just avoided

You know that you got Trump ????

You don't avoid much when you elect the option 100 X worse.

You know he wants to build a fence ?