Valkie wrote on Nov 16
th, 2016 at 5:28am:
Grappler Racist Filth wrote on Nov 16
th, 2016 at 12:58am:
'objectification of women'? You mean a man can no longer follow his natural instincts and place a high value on a fine piece of ass?
Grow up....
Come on, you know that is not what I'm talking about.
Every man likes to look at a nice female, except for some strange ones that prefer other men, dogs, cats, sheep, goats and shoes.
By objectification I mean they are seen as nothing more than chattel, something to be owned, have no self worth but are objects to be treated as such.This objectification is the unseen chains that bind women in THE CULT to the horrors of this cult.
Its not objectification to appreciate a nice looking female, unless you do it openly and with malicious intent.
Seriously though, Valk - in this day and age, how much of that really goes on? And how much is nothing more than the ingrained different natures of men and women - something nowhere more apparent that in boys and girls at public school? The point is that the two natures CAN make a great team - a fine blending of opposites - but they are - like NRL and NBL - two different approaches to a ball game and cannot be played against one another.
I think the malicious intent is more than 'objectification', though in order to view a woman as just something to shag is definitely making an object of her. In that case, why then has it become a crime for a man to love his woman and seek to maintain their steady partnership?
Again, such overly-theorised non-reasoning on an emotional basis by those who espouse 'feminism' offers a clear opportunity to label such Feminazis, since they seek to impose a governance by violence and threat over a social group, in defiance of the natural inclinations of the human race.
I suppose, as a footnote, that those who hold such non-reasoning could be excluded from the human race........ not fit to govern, etc... entitled to their opinion but never permitted to take over running the show and turning it into a lunatic asylum, just one point of view that has ZERO 'right' to exclude opposing views based on some absurd presumption of academic superiority and support.
A fine example was Labor's Steve Smith from Darkest Western Australia wanting to shove women willy-nilly into Direct Combat, then waffling that it is now a Right ™ for them to apply and try but they simply can't make the grade .... educated smart and full of theory but thick as two planks nailed end to end in the real world (are they still advertising all those little girlies on fork lifts signing up for a year in the Army?) .... and one has to ponder the fate of his students back home under that mentality, which says 'adhere to MY line or fail'..... some academic smarts right there, and we laugh at Islam and 'everything is already written down' etc....