|
aquascoot
|
if we go back through time, then we see how unatural feminism is.
all thru recorded history women were the ones who handled the "beauty" and men handled the "behaviours".
So hot women had inherent value and brave and courageous men had inherent value.
the alliance of the feminazis (who tend to be the non-hot women) with the "soft and delicate and "weak' beta males (who resent the alpha males getting all the hot women) was only possible in modern society because we became SO SUCCESSFUL that evolutionary pressure stopped being applied.
But people, at their core, know that evolutionary pressure is good for them and for society.
Whilst you can "survive ' in modern society and pump out a few kids even if you are very very mediocre, most people want to thrive more then survive.
Thriving not just surviving.
To go "up' in the world, it has become and is becoming neccessary to apply this evolutionary pressure (this pressure for growth) to ourselves.
This is the whole basis for self improvement.
If you just want to "cope"...go do that...it wont make you happy.
If you want to thrive, then as a woman, you must handle your nutrition, exercise routine and emotional state and as a man you must handle your masculinity (you must learn not to be a whiney little complaining , sorry for yourself , punk a*ss chode).
the interesting thing is women are the source of evolutionary pressure for the man who wants to learn these masculine behaviours. Women simply dont reward weak, supplicating, beta male, sooky, complaining, nervous and negative men.
They say "stay as a man , i will not encourage weak behaviour" Women , are the friend of the man on a path to growth. The feminists and the beaten down beta males have gone down an evolutionary dead end
|