Australian Politics Forum - Morrison rejects Hanson’s isolationism

Lord Herbert

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 34441
Gender: male

Re: Morrison rejects Hanson’s isolationism
Reply #15 - Oct 2^nd, 2016 at 7:38pm

How does stopping Muslim immigration translate as 'isolationism' in Morrison's diseased mind?

The people who have been charged with the job of protecting Australia's interests and its future are the very same people who are sponsoring the Islamic cultural mindset towards increasing in number and influence to the detriment of our future mainstream generations.

Back to top

« Last Edit: Oct 2^nd, 2016 at 7:45pm by Lord Herbert »

IP Logged

Black Orchid

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 5824
Gender: female

Re: Morrison rejects Hanson’s isolationism
Reply #16 - Oct 2^nd, 2016 at 8:04pm

Brian Ross wrote on Oct 2^nd, 2016 at 7:06pm:

Black Orchid wrote on Oct 1^st, 2016 at 10:14pm:

Sharia law is harsh and incompatible with Australian law (Pauline)

False (SBS)

Well I am sorry to disagree but that fact is TRUE especially if you are female!

Sh'aria Law does not need to be harsh, nor is it incompatible with existing Australian laws, when one considers the laws we have seen in the past in force in Australia concerning the treatment of different "races", women. children and gay men... Roll Eyes

It appears you don't like progress. Would you like to go back and take the vote away from women too?

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary Gold Member Online Australian Politics Posts: 149151 Gender:	Re: Morrison rejects Hanson’s isolationism Reply #17 - Oct 2^nd, 2016 at 8:06pm Brian Ross wrote on Oct 1^st, 2016 at 2:43pm: 10 times Pauline Hanson got the facts wrong in her maiden speech She got it wrong more than ten times.
Back to top	GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles IP Logged

Brian Ross

Gold Member

Offline

Representative of me

Posts: 45786

Re: Morrison rejects Hanson’s isolationism
Reply #18 - Oct 3^rd, 2016 at 12:16am

Black Orchid wrote on Oct 2^nd, 2016 at 8:04pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Oct 2^nd, 2016 at 7:06pm:

Black Orchid wrote on Oct 1^st, 2016 at 10:14pm:

Sharia law is harsh and incompatible with Australian law (Pauline)

False (SBS)

Well I am sorry to disagree but that fact is TRUE especially if you are female!

Sh'aria Law does not need to be harsh, nor is it incompatible with existing Australian laws, when one considers the laws we have seen in the past in force in Australia concerning the treatment of different "races", women. children and gay men... Roll Eyes

It appears you don't like progress. Would you like to go back and take the vote away from women too?

Do you enjoy erecting strawmen arguments in your spare time? Roll Eyes

Back to top

It seems that I have upset a Moderator and are forbidden from using posting to the general forum now. So much for Freedom of Speech. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

IP Logged

Brian Ross

Gold Member

Offline

Representative of me

Posts: 45786

Re: Morrison rejects Hanson’s isolationism
Reply #19 - Oct 3^rd, 2016 at 12:17am

Secret Wars wrote on Oct 2^nd, 2016 at 7:08pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Oct 2^nd, 2016 at 7:06pm:

Black Orchid wrote on Oct 1^st, 2016 at 10:14pm:

Sharia law is harsh and incompatible with Australian law (Pauline)

False (SBS)

Well I am sorry to disagree but that fact is TRUE especially if you are female!

Sh'aria Law does not need to be harsh, nor is it incompatible with existing Australian laws, when one considers the laws we have seen in the past in force in Australia concerning the treatment of different "races", women. children and gay men... Roll Eyes

Are those laws in the past laws you want to go back to Brian, cos that's the insinuation of your apologism.

Back to top

It seems that I have upset a Moderator and are forbidden from using posting to the general forum now. So much for Freedom of Speech. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

IP Logged

Secret Wars

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 3928
Gender: male

Re: Morrison rejects Hanson’s isolationism
Reply #20 - Oct 3^rd, 2016 at 6:44pm

Brian Ross wrote on Oct 3^rd, 2016 at 12:17am:

Secret Wars wrote on Oct 2^nd, 2016 at 7:08pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Oct 2^nd, 2016 at 7:06pm:

Black Orchid wrote on Oct 1^st, 2016 at 10:14pm:

Sharia law is harsh and incompatible with Australian law (Pauline)

False (SBS)

Well I am sorry to disagree but that fact is TRUE especially if you are female!

Sh'aria Law does not need to be harsh, nor is it incompatible with existing Australian laws, when one considers the laws we have seen in the past in force in Australia concerning the treatment of different "races", women. children and gay men... Roll Eyes

Are those laws in the past laws you want to go back to Brian, cos that's the insinuation of your apologism.

http://static8.comicvine.com/uploads/original/12/122743/2332811-yawn_20smiley.jp...

Brian it was your reflex apologism for all things Islamic that caused you to compare sharia law in a positive light because we once had similar laws.

That is why you are yawning now. No come back from where you placed yourself, an apologist and advocate for laws that the west has left behind, but you are all for them because they are Islamic.

You are the very epitome of regressive.

Back to top

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 55658
Gender: male

Re: Morrison rejects Hanson’s isolationism
Reply #21 - Oct 3^rd, 2016 at 9:05pm

Brian Ross wrote on Oct 2^nd, 2016 at 7:06pm:

Black Orchid wrote on Oct 1^st, 2016 at 10:14pm:

Sharia law is harsh and incompatible with Australian law (Pauline)

False (SBS)

Well I am sorry to disagree but that fact is TRUE especially if you are female!

Sh'aria Law does not need to be harsh, nor is it incompatible with existing Australian laws, when one considers the laws we have seen in the past in force in Australia concerning the treatment of different "races", women. children and gay men... Roll Eyes

You vulgar, oppressive little fascist, you, the Percy Wetmore of these boards!!! You do like a bit of chop-chop, a bit of torture, public stoning, blood and all that, don't you???

'it doesn't NEED to be harsh' he says menacingly. What a completely morally bankrupt worm you are.

"Different "races", women. children and gay men" are treated as equal before the law in Australia, you hideous little fascist. Not something you can say for most if not all Muslim jurisdictions.i

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

greggerypeccary Gold Member Online Australian Politics Posts: 149151 Gender:	Re: Morrison rejects Hanson’s isolationism Reply #22 - Oct 3^rd, 2016 at 10:18pm Frank wrote on Oct 3^rd, 2016 at 9:05pm: "Different "races", women. children and gay men" are treated as equal before the law in Australia ... ... a gay man can legally marry another gay man in Australia, can they? Or, did you lie?
Back to top	GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles IP Logged

Brian Ross

Gold Member

Offline

Representative of me

Posts: 45786

Re: Morrison rejects Hanson’s isolationism
Reply #23 - Oct 3^rd, 2016 at 10:54pm

Secret Wars wrote on Oct 3^rd, 2016 at 6:44pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Oct 3^rd, 2016 at 12:17am:

Secret Wars wrote on Oct 2^nd, 2016 at 7:08pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Oct 2^nd, 2016 at 7:06pm:

Black Orchid wrote on Oct 1^st, 2016 at 10:14pm:

Sharia law is harsh and incompatible with Australian law (Pauline)

False (SBS)

Well I am sorry to disagree but that fact is TRUE especially if you are female!

Sh'aria Law does not need to be harsh, nor is it incompatible with existing Australian laws, when one considers the laws we have seen in the past in force in Australia concerning the treatment of different "races", women. children and gay men... Roll Eyes

Are those laws in the past laws you want to go back to Brian, cos that's the insinuation of your apologism.

http://static8.comicvine.com/uploads/original/12/122743/2332811-yawn_20smiley.jp...

Brian it was your reflex apologism for all things Islamic that caused you to compare sharia law in a positive light because we once had similar laws.

That is why you are yawning now. No come back from where you placed yourself, an apologist and advocate for laws that the west has left behind, but you are all for them because they are Islamic.

You are the very epitome of regressive.

No, I am not where you placed me, fool. I have never advocated "going back" to unjust laws. Nor do I assume that all Sh'ria law is unjust, either. I suspect that you couldn't even define Sh'ria law, you are acting out of the usual bigotry which you display to all things Muslim and Islam. You have attempted to erect a strawman argument which I have never made. Roll Eyes

Back to top

It seems that I have upset a Moderator and are forbidden from using posting to the general forum now. So much for Freedom of Speech. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

IP Logged

Brian Ross

Gold Member

Offline

Representative of me

Posts: 45786

Re: Morrison rejects Hanson’s isolationism
Reply #24 - Oct 3^rd, 2016 at 11:02pm

Frank wrote on Oct 3^rd, 2016 at 9:05pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Oct 2^nd, 2016 at 7:06pm:

Black Orchid wrote on Oct 1^st, 2016 at 10:14pm:

Sharia law is harsh and incompatible with Australian law (Pauline)

False (SBS)

Well I am sorry to disagree but that fact is TRUE especially if you are female!

Sh'aria Law does not need to be harsh, nor is it incompatible with existing Australian laws, when one considers the laws we have seen in the past in force in Australia concerning the treatment of different "races", women. children and gay men... Roll Eyes

You vulgar, oppressive little fascist, you, the Percy Wetmore of these boards!!! You do like a bit of chop-chop, a bit of torture, public stoning, blood and all that, don't you???

Tsk, tsk, resorting to ad hominem again? How typical that you are unable to actually debate the matter under discussion and instead resort to insults all the time.

Quote:

'it doesn't NEED to be harsh' he says menacingly. What a completely morally bankrupt worm you are.

I doubt you could even define Sh'ria law. Few people can. I know I cannot. I do know that the concept of "Sh'ria law" varies markedly in every jurisdiction that it has been enacted because the Q'ran was written 1400 years ago, before the invention of many things which today are in everyday use and before the development of concepts and thinking which have occurred since. Most such jurisdictions have retained their pre-Sh'ria legal systems (invariably from their colonial past) to cover those areas. They have overlaid a legal system which is not necessarily what Mohammed would have recognised or accepted in medieval Arabia.

Quote:

"Different "races", women. children and gay men" are treated as equal before the law in Australia, you hideous little fascist. Not something you can say for most if not all Muslim jurisdictions.

Now they are. Once they were not. Therefore, how are laws enacted under a hypothetical Sh'ria regime incompatible with them? Mmm? Roll Eyes

Back to top

It seems that I have upset a Moderator and are forbidden from using posting to the general forum now. So much for Freedom of Speech. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 55658
Gender: male

Re: Morrison rejects Hanson’s isolationism
Reply #25 - Oct 4^th, 2016 at 10:40am

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 3^rd, 2016 at 10:18pm:

Frank wrote on Oct 3^rd, 2016 at 9:05pm:

"Different "races", women. children and gay men" are treated as equal before the law in Australia ...

... a gay man can legally marry another gay man in Australia, can they?

Or, did you lie?

The law says marriage is between a man and a woman.
All gay men are treated equally before that law, as are all others.

( and you thought how clever you are!! Grin

)

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged