Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 2
nd, 2016 at 8:37am:
it_is_the_light wrote on Sep 2
nd, 2016 at 3:29am:
BigOl64 wrote on Sep 1
st, 2016 at 3:08pm:
Less vaccinations = less overall protection = more dead children.
If it is just the anti-vaxxers children, then they get what they asked for, noi medical intervention to prevent death.
Anti-vaxxers just need to be isolated from everyone else, and live the way they want to live without science and without medicine.
But the herd must be protected
many blessings big ol ,
yet if you and your family are vaccinated
how can you contract any dis~ease you have been vaccinated against ?
dont you trust your medical doctors ???????
im interested ...
namaste
BVecause you've made a couple of common mistakes that vaccination automatically equals immunisation. In order to improve the safety of vaccines we've introduced acellular forms of vaccines. These do not have the full microorganism involved, instead an isolated portion that elicits an immune response. The disadvantage of these is that it requires multiple vaccinations with these types of vaccines in order to fully develop an immune response.
Additionally, our immune systems contrary to belief do not automatically remember a microorganism for our life span. Our immunity decreases as we age so many diseases that we caught as children and lie dormant can become active again (e.g. chicken pox and shingles). Many vaccines have a certain lifespan of memory and thus we require boosters.
Thirdly, some microorganisms are capable of changing. Influenza alters two of its key antigens regularly, thats why we require a flu shot every year.
If you'd bother studying immunology at at least a 1st year uni level, you'd understand this. Instead, you gloriously and happily bumble along in ignorance.
thats very interesting pastafarian , and yet
actual scientists , ( of which you are not )
refuse to immunise their children even after all your
fancy deceptive words introduced and actualized to create a sense of authority , of which does not ..
http://www.vaccines.news/2016-08-19-top-government-scientists-refuse-to-vaccinat...Top Government Scientists Refuse To Vaccinate Their Children

How shocking is it that New Mexico, the school district with the highest percentage of students whose families are opting out of vaccines, is actually one of the state’s most scientifically literate communities?
Well, if you know how harmful vaccines really are, you might not really be all that surprised. But for many, the 2.3 percent of students forgoing traditional vaccine regimens in Los Alamos is causing quite the upset. After all, many of the parents in the community work for US Los Alamos Labs, or one of the other scientific organizations that call the area home. For example, the Los Alamos National Laboratory has even conducted extensive research and development on a vaccine for HIV.
The Superintendent of the Los Alamos school systems has said that he finds the high rate of parents exempting their children from vaccination “curious,” given that it is a “pretty scientific and literate community.”
While the mainstream media continues to come up with all kinds of wild reasons for why “anti-vaxxers” don’t vaccinate their children, a community of scientists continues to abstain from the practice, much to the chagrin of pro-vaccine activists. Los Alamos is not alone; Santa Fe’s percentage of children not getting jabbed was just a few points behind, at 2.1 percent.
Anna Pentler, the head of the New Mexico Immunization Coalition (a pro-vaccine group) seems to think that not wanting to inject their children with toxic adjuvants and heavy metals is an “emotional issue,” and not an issue of ethics and morality. She says that while the science could be “99 to 1″ in favor of vaccines, a parent’s anecdotal story of how vaccines harmed their child could easily sway another parent’s opinion.
While it is true that the countless horror stories that many parents and children are forced to endure post-vaccination are enough to give any reasonable parent pause, the fact is that the science behind vaccine damage is also all there. The problem is that no one wants to believe it; no one wants their reality disrupted.
As the Children’s Medical Safety Research Institute states, “[T]here is a large body of scientific evidence confirming numerous vaccine safety deficits that counteract well-publicized benefits.
For example, several studies show that thimerosal (mercury) and aluminum in vaccines can cause neurological, immunological and developmental harm.
”
The CDC itself has conducted investigations on the harmful effects of certain ingredients in vaccines, and found that they did in fact disrupt neurological development in young children. But the mainstream media doesn’t care about that; they want you to fall in line and do your “due diligence” by getting vaccinated to maintain society’s “herd immunity” – which isn’t even real, by the way.
The vaccine agenda is one based on smoke and mirrors; its all a ruse to hide the harmful effects of vaccines that are felt worldwide...