longweekend58 wrote on Jul 27
th, 2016 at 3:30pm:
If you bother to actually read ALL of his comments, he is still a PROPONENT of privatisation, but has instead pointed out some fo the failures eg Vocational education.
Some of the failures? He's hardly said a single thing positive about it.
Quote:"When you meet people in the street and they say 'I don't want privatisation because it boosts prices' and you dismiss them ... recent examples suggest they're right," he told the room of influential economic and policy experts.
"The excessive spend on electric poles and wires has damaged our productivity. The higher energy price we're getting from some poor gas and electricity policies are damaging some of our productive sectors."
Mr Sims said he was growing "exasperated" as governments including the Commonwealth became more explicit in trying to maximise proceeds from asset sales.
"I think a sharp uppercut is necessary and that's why I'm saying: stop the privatisation," he said.
Why would he be saying "stop the privatisation" if he was still a proponent?
If the private sector was conducting share floats the way certain assets have been privatised, they would be up before the judge. Some privatisation efforts are little more than pump and dump scams.
Quote:However, his comments about electricty privatisation were dead wrong. Most govt electricity assets were in bad state of maintenance and govt was unwilling to spend what was needed for the future. Also, the reliability of the network soared AFTER privatisation.
Citation needed.* Where are you getting your facts?** Are you making them up again*** or do you have links this time?****
*Don't hold your breath.
**Out of his arse.