Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Poll Poll
Question: Will regressives continue to deny cause is ideas of Islam?

Yes    
  11 (100.0%)
No, they'll slowly come around    
  0 (0.0%)




Total votes: 11
« Created by: sir prince duke alevine on: Jul 26th, 2016 at 9:33pm »

Pages: 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 ... 13
Send Topic Print
Another one (Read 10232 times)
sir prince duke alevine
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male
Re: Another one
Reply #90 - Jul 27th, 2016 at 8:39pm
 
Aussie wrote on Jul 27th, 2016 at 8:22pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Jul 27th, 2016 at 8:09pm:
Aussie wrote on Jul 27th, 2016 at 7:35pm:
Quote:
Because the notion of human rights isn't just for the west. And when it's obvious they people are under regimes that 1) deny human rights and 2) can't be overthrown then it's the duty of all of us, every person, to stand up together.


And sing Kumbayah?  Or.......whinge, wail, gnash teeth, beat chests.....invade.....what?

Quote:
Not doing so perpetrates this idea that human rights are only for the well off white western world. The rest can go fck themselves?  Well... According to Aussie anyway, seems he's okay with people dying, as long as they aren't white.


Duke, where does that come from?  You seem to have a binary view and also, apparently, seek to impose it on everyone else.  Tell me, what are you doing about the rights of Eskimo women?



What's the grey in universal human rights, exactly?


Perhaps it is time you set them out in detail.  The floor is yours, Duke.


Un human rights charter.

Any objections?
Back to top
 

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.
 
IP Logged
 
sir prince duke alevine
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male
Re: Another one
Reply #91 - Jul 27th, 2016 at 8:45pm
 
News just in: 44 dead in Syria due to IS car bomb.

Regressives, new hashtag please!  Last one didn't seem to work.
Back to top
 

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.
 
IP Logged
 
Aussie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 39650
Gender: male
Re: Another one
Reply #92 - Jul 27th, 2016 at 8:51pm
 
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Jul 27th, 2016 at 8:45pm:
News just in: 44 dead in Syria due to IS car bomb.

Regressives, new hashtag please!  Last one didn't seem to work.


Isn't there a War going on there?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Aussie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 39650
Gender: male
Re: Another one
Reply #93 - Jul 27th, 2016 at 8:53pm
 
These, Duke?

Link.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
sir prince duke alevine
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male
Re: Another one
Reply #94 - Jul 27th, 2016 at 8:54pm
 
Aussie wrote on Jul 27th, 2016 at 8:51pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Jul 27th, 2016 at 8:45pm:
News just in: 44 dead in Syria due to IS car bomb.

Regressives, new hashtag please!  Last one didn't seem to work.


Isn't there a War going on there?

And who's winning? Or you're okay with universal human rights being denied as long as "there's a war going on there?"

So, Aussie, is the un human rights charter a good standard to set for the meaning of universal human rights?  What's grey in it?  Or are you okay with rights denied as long as it's "them" and not "us", a fundamentally rascist view.
Back to top
 

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.
 
IP Logged
 
Its time
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Boot libs out

Posts: 25639
Gender: female
Re: Another one
Reply #95 - Jul 27th, 2016 at 8:58pm
 
What about all the good things Hitler did?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Aussie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 39650
Gender: male
Re: Another one
Reply #96 - Jul 27th, 2016 at 9:00pm
 
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Jul 27th, 2016 at 8:54pm:
Aussie wrote on Jul 27th, 2016 at 8:51pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Jul 27th, 2016 at 8:45pm:
News just in: 44 dead in Syria due to IS car bomb.

Regressives, new hashtag please!  Last one didn't seem to work.


Isn't there a War going on there?

And who's winning? Or you're okay with universal human rights being denied as long as "there's a war going on there?"


There are very few rights in a War, Duke.  Both sides get to beat the schit out of each other until there is one still standing.

Quote:
So, Aussie, is the un human rights charter a good standard to set for the meaning of universal human rights?  What's grey in it?


I've just put up a link.  ^^^^^^^  Is that what you are referring to?


Quote:
Or are you okay with rights denied as long as it's "them" and not "us", a fundamentally rascist view.


We need to agree on a list of these Rights before I can answer that Duke.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
sir prince duke alevine
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male
Re: Another one
Reply #97 - Jul 27th, 2016 at 9:08pm
 
Aussie wrote on Jul 27th, 2016 at 9:00pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Jul 27th, 2016 at 8:54pm:
Aussie wrote on Jul 27th, 2016 at 8:51pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Jul 27th, 2016 at 8:45pm:
News just in: 44 dead in Syria due to IS car bomb.

Regressives, new hashtag please!  Last one didn't seem to work.


Isn't there a War going on there?

And who's winning? Or you're okay with universal human rights being denied as long as "there's a war going on there?"


There are very few rights in a War, Duke.  Both sides get to beat the schit out of each other until there is one still standing.

Quote:
So, Aussie, is the un human rights charter a good standard to set for the meaning of universal human rights?  What's grey in it?


I've just put up a link.  ^^^^^^^  Is that what you are referring to?


Quote:
Or are you okay with rights denied as long as it's "them" and not "us", a fundamentally rascist view.


We need to agree on a list of these Rights before I can answer that Duke.


You are terrible at Google Aussie.  "UN human rights charter."  Not hard.
Back to top
 

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.
 
IP Logged
 
sir prince duke alevine
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male
Re: Another one
Reply #98 - Jul 27th, 2016 at 9:10pm
 
Its time wrote on Jul 27th, 2016 at 8:58pm:
What about all the good things Hitler did?


Such as?
Back to top
 

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.
 
IP Logged
 
Aussie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 39650
Gender: male
Re: Another one
Reply #99 - Jul 27th, 2016 at 9:11pm
 
.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 45872
Re: Another one
Reply #100 - Jul 27th, 2016 at 9:12pm
 
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Jul 27th, 2016 at 6:16pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Jul 27th, 2016 at 5:11pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Jul 26th, 2016 at 10:22pm:
Aussie wrote on Jul 26th, 2016 at 10:21pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Jul 26th, 2016 at 10:19pm:
Aussie wrote on Jul 26th, 2016 at 10:14pm:
No......I simply say that the State of Israel ought not be where we plonked it.  'Tasmania' is a metaphor which I guess went right over your head.

And whys that? 


You put a mongoose into a snake pit and what do you reckon is the likely outcome?  A love-in?


Israel is not a mongoose because Israel has no interest in attacking Islamic countries.  It isn't the Jewish people who hate Muslims, it's the other way around.


For a country that has "no interest", it seems to have expanded his borders rather considerably from what the UN decreed they should be in 1948.   It also seems to have undertaken several wars of aggression against it's neighbours - 1956/1982/etc.   Roll Eyes

Well perhaps if the fascism didn't exist in the Middle East then Israel would have no need to feel threatened.  Of course Israel is not innocent in all actions and definitely the settlements have to be stopped, but when we look at the overall aggression in the region, all of it stems from the hatred over Jewish people. 1956 - Israel believed it was going to be attacked. 1967, the region waged war, 1982, who fired the first shots?  I know, I know, you don't like Israel. But it's the root cause they always matters: not just your hatred for Israel.


I am still unsure why you associate Islam with Fascism when the two are not interconnected in any way.  Indeed, Fascism has it's original roots in Christianity.

You acknowledge that Israel is paranoid.  Perhaps with reason by it has exploited the situation it has found itself in and greatly expanding it's borders.  It has also decided that ethnic cleansing through colonisation is a valid policy and how it should act towards the people under it's care through it's occupation of the Occupied Territories.   This is not tolerable, anywhere else in the world (remember what Bush Senior said about it in 1990?) but apparently acceptable to Washington in Palestine.   You don't seem to see that this is contributing to and perhaps even causing the hatred of the Israelis amongst the Arab population.    Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

It seems that I have upset a Moderator and are forbidden from using posting to the general forum now. So much for Freedom of Speech. Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Aussie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 39650
Gender: male
Re: Another one
Reply #101 - Jul 27th, 2016 at 9:14pm
 
Aussie wrote on Jul 27th, 2016 at 8:53pm:
These, Duke?

Link.


Oi....Dukey???????  Did you see this before you made a tit of yourself?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
sir prince duke alevine
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male
Re: Another one
Reply #102 - Jul 27th, 2016 at 9:14pm
 
Aussie wrote on Jul 27th, 2016 at 9:11pm:
Perhaps, given how terrible I am at Google, you ought put up the link to your own material?

http://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/


Aren't you a lawyer? How do you not know the universal human rights?
Back to top
 

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.
 
IP Logged
 
Neferti
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 7965
Canberra
Gender: female
Re: Another one
Reply #103 - Jul 27th, 2016 at 9:15pm
 
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Jul 27th, 2016 at 9:10pm:
Its time wrote on Jul 27th, 2016 at 8:58pm:
What about all the good things Hitler did?


Such as?


He got the remaining jews moved to Israel, rather than Tasmania? Roll Eyes
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 45872
Re: Another one
Reply #104 - Jul 27th, 2016 at 9:15pm
 
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Jul 27th, 2016 at 5:27pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Jul 27th, 2016 at 5:19pm:
longweekend58 wrote on Jul 27th, 2016 at 4:05pm:
Aussie wrote on Jul 26th, 2016 at 10:24pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Jul 26th, 2016 at 10:22pm:
Aussie wrote on Jul 26th, 2016 at 10:21pm:
sir prince duke alevine wrote on Jul 26th, 2016 at 10:19pm:
Aussie wrote on Jul 26th, 2016 at 10:14pm:
No......I simply say that the State of Israel ought not be where we plonked it.  'Tasmania' is a metaphor which I guess went right over your head.

And whys that? 


You put a mongoose into a snake pit and what do you reckon is the likely outcome?  A love-in?


Israel is not a mongoose because Israel has no interest in attacking Islamic countries.  It isn't the Jewish people who hate Muslims, it's the other way around.


Really......what was that little glitch in 1967?  Have you ever read the comments of Mr Hicks about the neighbours of Israel?



what glitch?  The arabs invaded and got their butts handed to them.


The "Arabs" failed to cross the border of the modern State of Israel.  Hardly an invasion...   Roll Eyes


Its the intent that counts, not whether they did or not. The preemptive strikes stopped them.


Wrong.  There was no intent in 1956.  The 1956 was a war that was manufacture - conspired by Israel, the UK and France in order to try and grab back the Suez Canal from the Egyptian people.   This has been clearly laid out in all the history books written since then.   The Egyptians didn't even have batteries in their tanks - having removed them to charge them - when the Israelis attacked in a completely unprovoked manner.    Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

It seems that I have upset a Moderator and are forbidden from using posting to the general forum now. So much for Freedom of Speech. Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 ... 13
Send Topic Print