Australian Politics Forum

sir prince duke alevine

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male

Re: Another one
Reply #120 - Jul 27^th, 2016 at 10:11pm

Aussie wrote on Jul 27^th, 2016 at 10:04pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Jul 27^th, 2016 at 9:50pm:

Aussie wrote on Jul 27^th, 2016 at 9:40pm:

Do you agree that the list of these rights you want to discuss is now set out in Post # 110 above?

I didn't read your post. I agree with the un human rights charter as the agreed universal human rights. Do you intend to waste anymore time with posting useless questions?

That is the UN list.

So why waste a post copying it here and asking me to agree to it when I have 1) given the link and 2) said I agreed with it already? Stop wasting time Aussie and get to your point, if you have one.

Back to top

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.

IP Logged

Its time Gold Member Offline Boot libs out Posts: 25639 Gender:	Re: Another one Reply #121 - Jul 27^th, 2016 at 10:13pm
Back to top	IP Logged

sir prince duke alevine Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 23619 Gender:	Re: Another one Reply #122 - Jul 27^th, 2016 at 10:15pm Its time wrote on Jul 27^th, 2016 at 10:13pm: Go away antisemite, you've shown us all that you're an idiot.
Back to top	Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of. IP Logged

Gordon

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 21660
Gordon
Gender: male

Re: Another one
Reply #123 - Jul 27^th, 2016 at 10:17pm

Its time wrote on Jul 27^th, 2016 at 9:40pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Jul 27^th, 2016 at 9:10pm:

Its time wrote on Jul 27^th, 2016 at 8:58pm:

What about all the good things Hitler did?

Such as?

Glad you asked
He cared about conditions for the Jews in the work camps

Unbeknown to billions of people the Nazi camps were not death camps, nor were they places to carry out human experiments. They were simply containment camps. Something had to be done with these destructive anti-social Jews who were strangling Germany. Thanks to the Jews, Germany had lost it’s moral code and had become debased and de-cultured, does that ring a bell?

Something had to be done! And Hitler did do something – he placed all the Jews in containment camps to allow Germany to breath again. But – this is the key point in this essay/piece. He did it in a way which was ethical. The camps had decent sufficient food (bearing in mind it was war time), they had theaters, swimming pools, football pitches, post offices where inmates could communicate to the outside world, kindergartens, art and music recreation and even prostitutes.

My theory is that if there had not have been a war effort, Hitler would not have even made the Jews work. AND I bet you the containment camps would have been luxury rehabilitation centers. In order to slowly de-programme the Jews from their mind control cult.

? Wtf

Back to top

IBI

IP Logged

Gordon Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 21660 Gordon Gender:	Re: Another one Reply #124 - Jul 27^th, 2016 at 10:18pm sir prince duke alevine wrote on Jul 27^th, 2016 at 10:15pm: Its time wrote on Jul 27^th, 2016 at 10:13pm: Go away antisemite, you've shown us all that you're an idiot. An antisemitism who also lies. He knows why.
Back to top	IBI IP Logged

sir prince duke alevine

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male

Re: Another one
Reply #125 - Jul 27^th, 2016 at 10:23pm

Gordon wrote on Jul 27^th, 2016 at 10:18pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Jul 27^th, 2016 at 10:15pm:

Its time wrote on Jul 27^th, 2016 at 10:13pm:

Go away antisemite, you've shown us all that you're an idiot.

An antisemitism who also lies.
He knows why.

I'm afraid he actually believes his sh1t. This is the problem with the regressive left, it's not even about their irrational views on the ideas of Islam, it's that they have always been like this. They actually believe hitler was not that bad, and the whole war was just another attempt to keep western imperialism. They are nuts. Plain nuts.

Back to top

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.

IP Logged

Baronvonrort

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 20275
Gender: male

Re: Another one
Reply #126 - Jul 27^th, 2016 at 10:28pm

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Jul 27^th, 2016 at 10:11pm:

Aussie wrote on Jul 27^th, 2016 at 10:04pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Jul 27^th, 2016 at 9:50pm:

Aussie wrote on Jul 27^th, 2016 at 9:40pm:

Do you agree that the list of these rights you want to discuss is now set out in Post # 110 above?

I didn't read your post. I agree with the un human rights charter as the agreed universal human rights. Do you intend to waste anymore time with posting useless questions?

That is the UN list.

So why waste a post copying it here and asking me to agree to it when I have 1) given the link and 2) said I agreed with it already? Stop wasting time Aussie and get to your point, if you have one.

The list of Universal Declaration of Human Rights that Arsie posted is not compatible with Islam, the Islamic apologists stick up for a religion that isn't compatible with human rights.

The Muslims have the Cairo Declaration of human rights, the last 2 articles show Sharia law trumps human rights.

The Caliphate have slavery, not compatible with UDHR, death for apostasy is a clear violation of article 18 of the UDHR, not much in the UDHR is compatible with Islam.

Perhaps Arsie and the other apologists should read the Islamic texts and see what they are defending.

Back to top

Leftists and the Ayatollahs have a lot in common when it comes to criticism of Islam, they don't tolerate it.

IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 39660
Gender: male

Re: Another one
Reply #127 - Jul 27^th, 2016 at 10:30pm

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Jul 27^th, 2016 at 10:11pm:

Aussie wrote on Jul 27^th, 2016 at 10:04pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Jul 27^th, 2016 at 9:50pm:

Aussie wrote on Jul 27^th, 2016 at 9:40pm:

Do you agree that the list of these rights you want to discuss is now set out in Post # 110 above?

I didn't read your post. I agree with the un human rights charter as the agreed universal human rights. Do you intend to waste anymore time with posting useless questions?

That is the UN list.

So why waste a post copying it here and asking me to agree to it when I have 1) given the link and 2) said I agreed with it already? Stop wasting time Aussie and get to your point, if you have one.

You did not give a link. You gave a description. I posted the link.

Anyway, before you concern yourself with other Sovereign States, how about you concentrate on the one you can influence directly. How's Australia going on 5, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13, 14, 16, 18, 19, 20, 22, 23 and 30?

Back to top

IP Logged

Its time

Gold Member

Offline

Boot libs out

Posts: 25639
Gender: female

Re: Another one
Reply #128 - Jul 27^th, 2016 at 10:34pm

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Jul 27^th, 2016 at 10:15pm:

Its time wrote on Jul 27^th, 2016 at 10:13pm:

Go away antisemite, you've shown us all that you're an idiot.

Quality sanitation within the camps was paramount and that is why the inmates clothes were regularly de-loused with Zyklon B gas. There were no human gas chambers……THAT IS A BIG FAT KOSHER LIE; to which the world has had to endure for over half a century.

Back to top

IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 39660
Gender: male

Re: Another one
Reply #129 - Jul 27^th, 2016 at 10:36pm

Quote:

Perhaps Arsie and the other apologists should read the Islamic texts and see what they are defending.

The only thing I am defending is the sovereignty of other Nations to adopt Laws as they see fit, and if those Laws do not accord with a UN Charter, I guess they won't be Members of the UN.

If some Yank tried to tell me that Australians ought to adopt their 2nd Amendment, I'd tell him to mind his own bloody business.

Back to top

IP Logged

sir prince duke alevine

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male

Re: Another one
Reply #130 - Jul 27^th, 2016 at 10:36pm

Aussie wrote on Jul 27^th, 2016 at 10:30pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Jul 27^th, 2016 at 10:11pm:

Aussie wrote on Jul 27^th, 2016 at 10:04pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Jul 27^th, 2016 at 9:50pm:

Aussie wrote on Jul 27^th, 2016 at 9:40pm:

Do you agree that the list of these rights you want to discuss is now set out in Post # 110 above?

I didn't read your post. I agree with the un human rights charter as the agreed universal human rights. Do you intend to waste anymore time with posting useless questions?

That is the UN list.

So why waste a post copying it here and asking me to agree to it when I have 1) given the link and 2) said I agreed with it already? Stop wasting time Aussie and get to your point, if you have one.

You did not give a link. You gave a description. I posted the link.

Anyway, before you concern yourself with other Sovereign States, how about you concentrate on the one you can influence directly. How's Australia going on 5, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13, 14, 16, 18, 19, 20, 22, 23 and 30?

I can't care about both cases? Why can't I care about both? Does Australia violating a human right trump the entire Middle East violation basically all human rights? What a flawed argument. So I shouldn't care about the abuse of women in the Middle East because we have women being beaten up and raped in Australia too? So, women of the Middle East, you can not drive cars, you can get gang raped and then punished - Aussie is okay with this because he's too concerned that in Australia rape exists too.

Back to top

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.

IP Logged

Gordon

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 21660
Gordon
Gender: male

Re: Another one
Reply #131 - Jul 27^th, 2016 at 10:39pm

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Jul 27^th, 2016 at 10:23pm:

Gordon wrote on Jul 27^th, 2016 at 10:18pm:

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Jul 27^th, 2016 at 10:15pm:

Its time wrote on Jul 27^th, 2016 at 10:13pm:

Go away antisemite, you've shown us all that you're an idiot.

An antisemitism who also lies.
He knows why.

I'm afraid he actually believes his sh1t. This is the problem with the regressive left, it's not even about their irrational views on the ideas of Islam, it's that they have always been like this. They actually believe hitler was not that bad, and the whole war was just another attempt to keep western imperialism. They are nuts. Plain nuts.

I've met old Jews who were in auschwitz.
Interesting when you search the text he posted it pops up in places like Stormfront, anarchists sites, truthers. He's no more than a nut job who doesn't even have $1000 to his name.

Back to top

IBI

IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 39660
Gender: male

Re: Another one
Reply #132 - Jul 27^th, 2016 at 10:40pm

Geebuz Duke, now you are getting hysterical. Where did I say any of this?

Quote:

I can't care about both cases? Why can't I care about both? Does Australia violating a human right trump the entire Middle East violation basically all human rights? What a flawed argument. So I shouldn't care about the abuse of women in the Middle East because we have women being beaten up and raped in Australia too? So, women of the Middle East, you can not drive cars, you can get gang raped and then punished - Aussie is okay with this because he's too concerned that in Australia rape exists too.

Naughty, Duke. Verballing me with your burdens will not work, you know.

Back to top

IP Logged

sir prince duke alevine

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male

Re: Another one
Reply #133 - Jul 27^th, 2016 at 10:41pm

Aussie wrote on Jul 27^th, 2016 at 10:36pm:

Quote:

Perhaps Arsie and the other apologists should read the Islamic texts and see what they are defending.

The only thing I am defending is the sovereignty of other Nations to adopt Laws as they see fit, and if those Laws do not accord with a UN Charter, I guess they won't be Members of the UN.

If some Yank tried to tell me that Australians ought to adopt their 2nd Amendment, I'd tell him to mind his own bloody business.

and yet they are members, in fact some of them are on the human rights council Grin

.

Your argument works when we deal with democratic states, where people actually have a chance to have a say. And sovereignty isn't the be it and all for law making. Laws should abide by set standards, such as a human rights charter. If they dont, I have no problem with criticising and I have no problem with enforcement. We are talking about dictators and regimes that, according to all regressive leftists, aren't acting in the interest of their people. Why are you against offering these peaceful people a hand in removing their regimes who deny them the say on what the laws should be?

Back to top

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.

IP Logged

Baronvonrort

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 20275
Gender: male

Re: Another one
Reply #134 - Jul 27^th, 2016 at 10:41pm

Aussie wrote on Jul 27^th, 2016 at 10:36pm:

Quote:

Perhaps Arsie and the other apologists should read the Islamic texts and see what they are defending.

The only thing I am defending is the sovereignty of other Nations to adopt Laws as they see fit, and if those Laws do not accord with a UN Charter, I guess they won't be Members of the UN.

The UN appointed the Saudis to chair the human rights panel.

The Saudis behead atheists/homos/witches/blasphemers, they amputate hands from thieves and don't let women drive or have rights.

So why are the Saudis not only members of the UN but the chair on human rights?

Stick to driving taxis arsie you are out of your depth with anything else

Back to top

Leftists and the Ayatollahs have a lot in common when it comes to criticism of Islam, they don't tolerate it.

IP Logged

Poll
Question: Will regressives continue to deny cause is ideas of Islam?
Yes 11 (100.0%) No, they'll slowly come around 0 (0.0%) Total votes: 11 « Created by: sir prince duke alevine on: Jul 26^th, 2016 at 9:33pm »