greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 22
nd, 2016 at 2:43pm:
rhino wrote on Jul 22
nd, 2016 at 2:41pm:
To be a murderer you dont have to be the one committing the actual physical act, providing logistical support is enough to sustain a charge of murder, theres plenty of precedent for that. So if this guy had support from others who also intended people to die from their actions they are all indeed murderers. I hope this clears that up.
I'm more than happy to be corrected, but hitherto all reports say there was only one murderer, correct?
You're logic is lacking, Greggy. It's ok, we all know your're doing your little pedantry dance.
Lets examine another scenario.
Person A hires person B to perform a contract killing.
Person B does the contract killing while person A is on holiday in Tahiti.
Person B is caught red handed at the scene, confesses and spills the beans on person A and there is overwhelming evidence to corroborate it.
Person A goes to jail.
According to your logic, there is only one actual murderer so no need extend the investigation as doing so would be blame shifting.