Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 10 11 12 
Send Topic Print
Incoming UK PM equivocal on Sharia (Read 9781 times)
Dirty Paki Khunt
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 103235
Re: Incoming UK PM equivocal on Sharia
Reply #165 - Jul 15th, 2016 at 9:59am
 
The4thEstate wrote on Jul 15th, 2016 at 3:01am:
Lord Herbert wrote on Jul 14th, 2016 at 6:18pm:
Dirty Paki Khunt wrote on Jul 14th, 2016 at 4:37pm:
If England wants its free trade with Europe it must also accept free migration. That's the deal.


Hence the Brexit result.

It's like New Zealand being Australia's backdoor entry-point with every Tom, Dick, and Mohammad needing only to remain in NZ for two years before then automatically qualifying to come swanning across the ditch. 



Here's the latest reason that Brexit was a good idea ... and why there will most likely be other "exits" to come.
http://www.breitbart.com/london/2016/07/14/european-court-rules-workplace-hijab-...

Quote:
The European Court of Justice has made a ruling declaring it illegal for a business to fire a woman because she wore a hijab to work, saying customers and employers should get used to it.

The case was brought to the court by Asma Bougnaoui who was hired by French IT consulting firm Micopole SA as a project engineer in 2009. Ms. Bougnaoui’s role was to go out and interact and advise clients. When clients of the company refused to work with her because of her Islamic headscarf, or hijab, the company felt they had no choice but to terminate her employment.

The court has ruled that the decision to release Ms. Bougnaoui from her contract was discrimination based on religion and therefore illegal, Zeit reports.

Ah, yes -- even after terrorist attacks in France and Belgium, and sexual attacks in Germany, Sweden and the UK, the clueless Eurocrats declare "Europe for Muslims!"

Globalism uber alles!


No, the court found sacking someone for wearing a headscarf is illegal. A court would make the same ruling in the US and Australia.

But again, I'm curious. Do you want to have a stab at how we can ban Sharia? You can suggest how we can ban headscarves too.

I don't think anyone is defending or promoting Sharia here. I'm saying it's constitutional. It's quite legal to seek council from independent parties, religious or otherwise, to manage your disputes with others. This is not only legal in Australia, it's recommended in Family law. In NSW, it's mandatory - mediation must take place before the Family Court will hear a case.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Dirty Paki Khunt
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 103235
Re: Incoming UK PM equivocal on Sharia
Reply #166 - Jul 15th, 2016 at 10:03am
 
Lord Herbert wrote on Jul 15th, 2016 at 7:08am:
Good one, T4E.

I'm a little puzzled as to how the European Court of Justice calls this discrimination on religious grounds


You're puzzled as to how an employer sacking an employee for wearing a headscarf is discrimination?

I doubt that, Herbie. I think you're more puzzled as to why religious discrimination is not enshrined in law.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Baronvonrort
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20668
Gender: male
Re: Incoming UK PM equivocal on Sharia
Reply #167 - Jul 15th, 2016 at 10:05am
 
The4thEstate wrote on Jul 15th, 2016 at 7:57am:
Lord Herbert wrote on Jul 15th, 2016 at 7:08am:
Good one, T4E.

I'm a little puzzled as to how the European Court of Justice calls this discrimination on religious grounds, when in fact, after questioning,  Islamic scholars have repeatedly informed the public that there is no religious requirement for women to wear the hijab, niqab, or burqa, and that these apparels are expressions of personal whimsy on the part of those who wear them.

No matter how much these women protest to the contrary, these sartorial affectations are nothing more than fashion statements so far as Islamic scholars are concerned. 

As Christians, women could conceivably walk around in head-to-toe 'Virgin Mary' outfits, right down to their Birkenstock sandals - and claim religious discrimination when refused a job as a fashion model or at a suntan clinic. 

It's all idiosyncratic vanity posing as piety and moral virtue.

Here's the most dead-on quote I've ever heard regarding the hijab:

Quote:
Mark Steyn says in his book America Alone that “there is no evidence that any Muslim woman anywhere ever wore the jilbab before the disco era, when it was taken up by the Muslim Brotherhood and others in the Arab world. It is no more ancient and traditional than platform shoes, bell bottoms, and cheesecloth shirts.”


More apologist bullshit.

Read this verse about $Profit Mo marrying Safiyya after he had her husband tortured by lighting a fire on his chest before they chopped his head off, muslims will say $Profit Mo was a kind man who married widows.

Does it say if she is made to wear the veil she will be a muslim and if she doesn't wear the veil she will be his slave?

Does this verse show the veil was common for muslims and not used by non muslims?
sunnah.com/bukhari/67/23
Back to top
 

Leftists and the Ayatollahs have a lot in common when it comes to criticism of Islam, they don't tolerate it.
 
IP Logged
 
Lord Herbert
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 34441
Gender: male
Re: Incoming UK PM equivocal on Sharia
Reply #168 - Jul 15th, 2016 at 11:53am
 
..
Back to top
« Last Edit: Jul 15th, 2016 at 12:03pm by Lord Herbert »  
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 10 11 12 
Send Topic Print