Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Poll Poll
Question: Should Bendigo Mosque receive a warm welcome

yes    
  3 (37.5%)
no    
  3 (37.5%)
middling warm    
  0 (0.0%)
hot    
  2 (25.0%)




Total votes: 8
« Created by: ian on: Jun 17th, 2016 at 9:02pm »

Pages: 1 ... 11 12 13 14 
Send Topic Print
Bendigo Mosque recieves final go-ahead (Read 8445 times)
ian
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 9451
Re: Bendigo Mosque recieves final go-ahead
Reply #180 - Jun 21st, 2016 at 11:21pm
 
polite_gandalf wrote on Jun 21st, 2016 at 2:25pm:
I deliberately omitted the Geelong mosque because it was an old church, and presumably was targeted as a church.

So, anyway - Ian, given that your one justification for threatening arson against mosques has been proven wrong, would you like to take the opportunity to retract that threat?
So now you need to apologise for slandering me by attributing comments i did not make.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Melanias purse
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 101581
Re: Bendigo Mosque recieves final go-ahead
Reply #181 - Jun 21st, 2016 at 11:25pm
 
polite_gandalf wrote on Jun 21st, 2016 at 10:58pm:
ian wrote on Jun 21st, 2016 at 9:40pm:
Show where I threatened arson.


Ian thats what I've been asking you to clarify all through this thread. What did you mean by give the mosque a "warm" welcome? When you refused to answer - about 4 times now - I took that to mean you did mean burn it. But feel clear to clarify now.

And yes, I do realise you are playing immature games.


Who’s been.learning from good old FD?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
polite_gandalf
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20027
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: Bendigo Mosque recieves final go-ahead
Reply #182 - Jun 22nd, 2016 at 10:45am
 
ian wrote on Jun 21st, 2016 at 11:20pm:
No, I dont advocate arson. but the locals need to make it clear that this Mosque is not welcome.


By giving them a "warm" welcome?

You never explained what that means. If not an arson attack, then what? Forgive me for thinking it sounds rather sinister.
Back to top
 

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:
Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.
 
IP Logged
 
moses
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6353
Re: Bendigo Mosque recieves final go-ahead
Reply #183 - Jun 23rd, 2016 at 12:53pm
 
@ Brian Ross

moses wrote Reply #174 - Jun 21st, 2016 at 8:19pm

So we have you advocating that you are a greater exponent of what constitutes a Christian than what we are to read in the N.T..

You tell us that the teachings of Christ take second place to what men say and believe.

You have continuously stated that if a person says and believes they are a Christian they absolutely are, regardless of what evil deeds they have committed.

So going on your definition of what makes a Christian, The question arises: Do you apply the same criteria to what is a muslim?

Muslims who are the terrorists, muslims who burn people alive, muslims who behead innocent people in the name of islam, muslims who teach their children how to behead a fellow human being, muslims who put people in cages and drown them, muslims who tie people up and throw them off buildings, muslims who murder non muslims in the name of islam, muslims who rape women, muslims who rape then murder their own sisters and daughters in honour killings, muslims who shoot schoolgirls etc. etc. all say they are muslims, they all believe they are the highest grade of muslim as stated in the qur'an.

You by your own words support these people, as they are true muslims by your definition, they say and believe they are.

Now this begs the question just how sick are you to want a religion in our country which by your very own definition, is a religion of rape, child slaughter, beheading, terrorism, burning people alive, honour killings etc.?


Why do you support human rights atrocities committed by people who you determine to be the true muslims?



Bump
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Sprintcyclist
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 41405
Gender: male
Re: Bendigo Mosque recieves final go-ahead
Reply #184 - Jun 23rd, 2016 at 12:56pm
 
Frank wrote on Jun 21st, 2016 at 8:29pm:
polite_gandalf wrote on Jun 21st, 2016 at 11:43am:
ian wrote on Jun 20th, 2016 at 8:54pm:
polite_gandalf wrote on Jun 20th, 2016 at 3:09pm:
Hi Ian - what about burning mosques? Does that matter? Would you mind clarifying when you advocated giving the mosque a "warm" welcome (your inverted commas), were you referring to burning it down? If it was a simple misinterpretation on my part, no worries, just correct the record for us, thanks.

How many Mosques have been burnt down in Australia? Zero i believe. non issue. next.


You're not denying it. So Ian, correct me if I'm wrong, you are saying its ok to advocate acts of arson directed against a particular faith - because no such acts have ever been carried out yet?

And by the way you are wrong - the Kuraby mosque in QLD was burnt to the ground right after 9/11. Also the Toowoomba mosque was attacked twice by arsonists in the space of 4 months last year - the second time it was almost completely destroyed. There have been numerous other incidents of firebombing and vandalism.




It is disgusting for you to get all bolshie about 'what ifs' when Muslims are ACTUALLY killing Christians, ACTUALLY burning down churches, ACTUALLY persecuting Christians and other non-Muslims out of existence.

But then that's what Muslims do- they kill, destroy, maim and rampage - and then claim to be victims because you have simply no compunction, no moral compass recognised by civilised people - dhimmis are to be oppressed, persecuted and avenged and Muslims are to be elevated, protected, prioritised.


If a mosque is burned down it is  morally no different to what Muslims do to Christian churches the world over.  You, a spineless, chancy agent of subversion, make a big bloody noise whan the Muslims are paid pack by their own coin.


But there is nothing new in your double standards. The world IS divided into Muslims and non-Muslims for you.

Which is why Muslims should be banned from the West until you revise your two-tier ethics.




The dishonesty of Muslim ethics is all too obvious.




X 2
Back to top
 

Modern Classic Right Wing
 
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 46311
Re: Bendigo Mosque recieves final go-ahead
Reply #185 - Jun 23rd, 2016 at 1:24pm
 
moses wrote on Jun 23rd, 2016 at 12:53pm:
@ Brian Ross

moses wrote Reply #174 - Jun 21st, 2016 at 8:19pm

So we have you advocating that you are a greater exponent of what constitutes a Christian than what we are to read in the N.T..


Actually, what I am saying is that the history of Christianity indicates there are many Christians, not I, who have decided what constitutes a Christian, rather than just what is in the New Testament, Moses.

Can you grasp that sentence?  At all?

It's not me, it is the 2,000+ years of Christianity that shows there are multitudes of people who consider themselves to be Christians, despite their beliefs not fitting into what you consider a Christian to be, Moses.

And remember, we are not only considering what the New Testament tells us but we are considering what the Church and it's preachers have said over 2,000+ years.

Do you deny that the Church has used it's theology to justify war, theft, rape, paedophilia, slavery, etc.?

Quote:
You tell us that the teachings of Christ take second place to what men say and believe.


Not to me, Moses.

Ask the multitudes of Christians who believed what their churches and preachers told them and went out and quite happily waged war, theft, rape, paedophilia, slavery, etc. on Christians and non-Christians alike.  They may have a different answer.

Quote:
You have continuously stated that if a person says and believes they are a Christian they absolutely are, regardless of what evil deeds they have committed.


Whom am I to doubt them, Moses?

You appear willing to accept that anybody calling themselves a Muslim is a Terrorist.

Quote:
So going on your definition of what makes a Christian, The question arises: Do you apply the same criteria to what is a muslim?


Again, not my definition.   You appear to personalise this far too much, Moses.  I wonder why?

You're asking my question, as it appears you do apply the idea that all Muslims are Terrorists to every Muslim,  yet you continually make excuses for every person who calls themselves a Christian.  I wonder why?   Roll Eyes

Quote:
Muslims who are the terrorists, muslims who burn people alive, muslims who behead innocent people in the name of islam, muslims who teach their children how to behead a fellow human being, muslims who put people in cages and drown them, muslims who tie people up and throw them off buildings, muslims who murder non muslims in the name of islam, muslims who rape women, muslims who rape then murder their own sisters and daughters in honour killings, muslims who shoot schoolgirls etc. etc. all say they are muslims, they all believe they are the highest grade of muslim as stated in the qur'an.


Lets substitute Christian for Muslim in your paragraph and save time, OK?   Why do you keep disowning them despite them claiming they are Christian, Moses?   Who determines whom is a Christian?  You or the Christian themselves?   Roll Eyes

Quote:
You by your own words support these people, as they are true muslims by your definition, they say and believe they are.


You can of course, quote back where I have supported Terrorists, Moses?

In reality, I have and continue to condemn anybody who commits a crime, be they Muslim or Christian or Hindu or Taoist or Buddhist or any other religious persuasion.    Why do you find that hard to accept?

True Muslims are peaceful, law abiding people, Moses.  You know, the people who walk the streets of Australian cities every day?

You however, have decided to brand all Muslims as Islamists (look the word up if you don't know what it means).   Why?

It's like me branding all Christians as fundamentalists, members of Opus Dei or the Westboro Baptist Church or Hillsong or Fred Nile's mob.   Roll Eyes

Quote:
Now this begs the question just how sick are you to want a religion in our country which by your very own definition, is a religion of rape, child slaughter, beheading, terrorism, burning people alive, honour killings etc.?


You're right.  Lets ban Christianity.  There, an exhortation to ban a religion from our country which your very own definition, is a religion of rape, child slaughter, beheading, terrorism, burning people alive, honour killings etc.!

And if you don't believe Christianity has committed all those crimes, I have a nice bridge in Sydney I'd like to sell you, Moses.   Roll Eyes

Quote:
Why do you support human rights atrocities committed by people who you determine to be the true muslims?


Where have I determined Islamists to be "true Muslims"?

Using your sort of logic then, I take it you support Fred Nile, Hillsong, Opus Dei, Westboro Baptist Church, etc. to be all "true Christians" in their attitudes of hatred?   The various denomination's organised churches because of their covering up of Paedophilia by their Priests?   Their waging of war, rape, burning of innocents, etc.?    Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

What about you, Moses, are you a "true Christian" with your stated hatred towards other people?  Mmmm?    Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

It seems that I have upset a Moderator and are forbidden from using posting to the general forum now. So much for Freedom of Speech. Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
ian
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 9451
Re: Bendigo Mosque recieves final go-ahead
Reply #186 - Jun 23rd, 2016 at 1:37pm
 
polite_gandalf wrote on Jun 22nd, 2016 at 10:45am:
ian wrote on Jun 21st, 2016 at 11:20pm:
No, I dont advocate arson. but the locals need to make it clear that this Mosque is not welcome.


By giving them a "warm" welcome?

You never explained what that means. If not an arson attack, then what? Forgive me for thinking it sounds rather sinister.
still waiting for that apology
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 151180
Gender: male
Re: Bendigo Mosque recieves final go-ahead
Reply #187 - Jun 23rd, 2016 at 1:39pm
 
ian wrote on Jun 21st, 2016 at 11:20pm:
No, I dont advocate arson.


Yes, you do.

You've called for it and supported it on several occasions in this forum.

Back to top
 

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles
 
IP Logged
 
moses
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6353
Re: Bendigo Mosque recieves final go-ahead
Reply #188 - Jun 23rd, 2016 at 1:48pm
 
Brian ross wrote:
Quote:
Actually, what I am saying is that the history of Christianity indicates there are many Christians, not I, who have decided what constitutes a Christian, rather than just what is in the New Testament, Moses.

Can you grasp that sentence?  At all?

It's not me, it is the 2,000+ years of Christianity that shows there are multitudes of people who consider themselves to be Christians, despite their beliefs not fitting into what you consider a Christian to be, Moses.

And remember, we are not only considering what the New Testament tells us but we are considering what the Church and it's preachers have said over 2,000+ years.

Do you deny that the Church has used it's theology to justify war, theft, rape, paedophilia, slavery, etc.?

&

Not to me, Moses.

Ask the multitudes of Christians who believed what their churches and preachers told them and went out and quite happily waged war, theft, rape, paedophilia, slavery, etc. on Christians and non-Christians alike.  They may have a different answer.

&

Whom am I to doubt them, Moses?

You appear willing to accept that anybody calling themselves a Muslim is a Terrorist.

&

Again, not my definition.   You appear to personalise this far too much, Moses.  I wonder why?

You're asking my question, as it appears you do apply the idea that all Muslims are Terrorists to every Muslim,  yet you continually make excuses for every person who calls themselves a Christian.  I wonder why?

&

Lets substitute Christian for Muslim in your paragraph and save time, OK?   Why do you keep disowning them despite them claiming they are Christian, Moses?   Who determines whom is a Christian?  You or the Christian themselves?

&

You can of course, quote back where I have supported Terrorists, Moses?

In reality, I have and continue to condemn anybody who commits a crime, be they Muslim or Christian or Hindu or Taoist or Buddhist or any other religious persuasion.    Why do you find that hard to accept?

True Muslims are peaceful, law abiding people, Moses.  You know, the people who walk the streets of Australian cities every day?

You however, have decided to brand all Muslims as Islamists (look the word up if you don't know what it means).   Why?

It's like me branding all Christians as fundamentalists, members of Opus Dei or the Westboro Baptist Church or Hillsong or Fred Nile's mob.

&

You're right.  Lets ban Christianity.  There, an exhortation to ban a religion from our country which your very own definition, is a religion of rape, child slaughter, beheading, terrorism, burning people alive, honour killings etc.!

And if you don't believe Christianity has committed all those crimes, I have a nice bridge in Sydney I'd like to sell you, Moses.

&


Where have I determined Islamists to be "true Muslims"?

Using your sort of logic then, I take it you support Fred Nile, Hillsong, Opus Dei, Westboro Baptist Church, etc. to be all "true Christians" in their attitudes of hatred?   The various denomination's organised churches because of their covering up of Paedophilia by their Priests?   Their waging of war, rape, burning of innocents, etc.?   

What about you, Moses, are you a "true Christian" with your stated hatred towards other people?  Mmmm?


You're slithering all over the place Brian.

You contested my position of: Defining a Christian as someone who meets the criteria set down by Christ. I argued that workers of evil do not fill the requirements.
 

You argued that no matter what they do, if they say and believe they are Christian, they are.

Now you're trying to lie your way out.

My definition of a Christian has not changed, they either meet the criteria set down in the N.T. or they don't.

Now I repeat:

Going on your own definition of what makes a Christian, The question arises: Do you apply the same criteria to what is a muslim?

Muslims who are the terrorists, muslims who burn people alive, muslims who behead innocent people in the name of islam, muslims who teach their children how to behead a fellow human being, muslims who put people in cages and drown them, muslims who tie people up and throw them off buildings, muslims who murder non muslims in the name of islam, muslims who rape women, muslims who rape then murder their own sisters and daughters in honour killings, muslims who shoot schoolgirls etc. etc. all say they are muslims, they all believe they are the highest grade of muslim as stated in the qur'an.

You by your own words support these people, as they are true muslims by your definition, they say and believe they are.

Now this begs the question just how sick are you to want a religion in our country which by your very own definition, is a religion of rape, child slaughter, beheading, terrorism, burning people alive, honour killings etc.?


Why do you support human rights atrocities committed by people who you determine to be the true muslims?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 46311
Re: Bendigo Mosque recieves final go-ahead
Reply #189 - Jun 23rd, 2016 at 2:01pm
 
moses wrote on Jun 23rd, 2016 at 1:48pm:
You're slithering all over the place Brian.


No, I am still making the same point.   Who am I to not accept that when a person declares themselves to be a Christian, isn't one, despite them disobeying everything their saviour has said?

Quote:
You contested my position of: Defining a Christian as someone who meets the criteria set down by Christ. I argued that workers of evil do not fill the requirements.


Yet, as I keep pointing out, who are you to define whether or not a fellow Christian is a Christian or not when they claim they are Christian, whilst murdering, raping, burnings, pillaging, destroying whole nations, etc.?
 
Quote:

You argued that no matter what they do, if they say and believe they are Christian, they are.


I am merely agreeing with their own definition of them and their acts as being those of a "Christian", Moses.    You have yet to demonstrate to me, sufficiently why their definition is wrong.

Quote:
Now you're trying to lie your way out.


You do know what the definition of a "lie" is, Moses?

"To knowing tell an untruth"

How do you know I am knowingly telling an untruth?

You have yet to prove that I am knowingly telling an untruth.   Your claim, your opinion that I am "lying" doesn't cut it, Moses.   You must prove it.  Where is your evidence?  Mmmm?    Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

Quote:
My definition of a Christian has not changed, they either meet the criteria set down in the N.T. or they don't.


That is your definition, Moses.

It is obviously not the definition that your co-religionists are using.

Are you so sure your definition is correct?   Why is theirs' incorrect?

2,000+ years they have been using that definition.   Who am I to doubt 2,000+ years of tradition?  Mmmm?    Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

Quote:
Now I repeat:

Going on your own definition of what makes a Christian, The question arises: Do you apply the same criteria to what is a muslim?


Yet you don't apply your definition of what makes a Christian to what makes a Muslim.   I find that rather interesting...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

Quote:
Muslims who are the terrorists, muslims who burn people alive, muslims who behead innocent people in the name of islam, muslims who teach their children how to behead a fellow human being, muslims who put people in cages and drown them, muslims who tie people up and throw them off buildings, muslims who murder non muslims in the name of islam, muslims who rape women, muslims who rape then murder their own sisters and daughters in honour killings, muslims who shoot schoolgirls etc. etc. all say they are muslims, they all believe they are the highest grade of muslim as stated in the qur'an.

You by your own words support these people, as they are true muslims by your definition, they say and believe they are.


Yes they do.  However, their actions are invariably committed against everyday, moderate, Muslims.   So, you don't think this all part of an internecine conflict as to who is a true Muslim and who isn't?   You know, like the 30 Years War with it's millions of innocent dead was between those who considered themselves true Christians and those they didn't?

I believe it's all a matter of context and extremes, Moses.  Something you appear unwilling to accept in your extreme position.  Funny how you keep disobeying the very instructions that you claim defines a Christian...    Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

Quote:
Now this begs the question just how sick are you to want a religion in our country which by your very own definition, is a religion of rape, child slaughter, beheading, terrorism, burning people alive, honour killings etc.?


Already answered that, Moses with my exhortation to ban Christianity, a religion in our country which by your very own definition, is a religion of rape, child slaughter, beheading, terrorism, burning people alive, honour killings etc.

Quote:
Why do you support human rights atrocities committed by people who you determine to be the true muslims?


I don't.  Perhaps you'd care to quote back to me where I have?

BTW, I don't believe I've ever said that Islamists are "true Muslims", either.   So, how about you quote it back to me as well, OK?    Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

It seems that I have upset a Moderator and are forbidden from using posting to the general forum now. So much for Freedom of Speech. Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
moses
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6353
Re: Bendigo Mosque recieves final go-ahead
Reply #190 - Jun 23rd, 2016 at 2:45pm
 
Brian Ross wrote:

Quote:
No, I am still making the same point.   Who am I to not accept that when a person declares themselves to be a Christian, isn't one, despite them disobeying everything their saviour has said?


Christ and the N.T. disagree with you

Quote:
Yet, as I keep pointing out, who are you to define whether or not a fellow Christian is a Christian or not when they claim they are Christian, whilst murdering, raping, burnings, pillaging, destroying whole nations, etc.?


We all have opinions mine is that the scripture defines who is a Christian, you tell us so long as they say and believe they are, they must be.

Quote:
I am merely agreeing with their own definition of them and their acts as being those of a "Christian", Moses.    You have yet to demonstrate to me, sufficiently why their definition is wrong.


Exactly you ignore the N.T. (for your own purposes to propagate hatred against Christians) which is the ultimate written authority on Christian criteria.

Quote:
That is your definition, Moses.

It is obviously not the definition that your co-religionists are using.

Are you so sure your definition is correct?   Why is theirs' incorrect?

2,000+ years they have been using that definition.   Who am I to doubt 2,000+ years of tradition?  Mmmm?


My definition is straight out of the N.T. teachings.

Quote:
Yet you don't apply your definition of what makes a Christian to what makes a Muslim.   I find that rather interesting


Why the lie again Brian?

My definition of a muslim is straight out of the qur'an: the highest grade of muslim must slay and be slain in the cause of allah, muslims must kill other muslims who are corrupt and hypocrites etc..

Quote:
Yes they do.  However, their actions are invariably committed against everyday, moderate, Muslims.   So, you don't think this all part of an internecine conflict as to who is a true Muslim and who isn't?   You know, like the 30 Years War with it's millions of innocent dead was between those who considered themselves true Christians and those they didn't?

I believe it's all a matter of context and extremes, Moses.  Something you appear unwilling to accept in your extreme position.  Funny how you keep disobeying the very instructions that you claim defines a Christian...
 

muslims killings other muslims is a tenet of their satanic cult, they are to torture and murder corrupters, hypocrites, apostates etc.

Quote:
BTW, I don't believe I've ever said that Islamists are "true Muslims", either.   So, how about you quote it back to me as well, OK?


Are you telling us that you don't believe muslims who say and believe they are the highest grade and a true muslim?

Are you lying to us again Brian?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
mothra
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 36389
Gender: female
Re: Bendigo Mosque recieves final go-ahead
Reply #191 - Jun 23rd, 2016 at 2:53pm
 
ian wrote on Jun 21st, 2016 at 11:21pm:
polite_gandalf wrote on Jun 21st, 2016 at 2:25pm:
I deliberately omitted the Geelong mosque because it was an old church, and presumably was targeted as a church.

So, anyway - Ian, given that your one justification for threatening arson against mosques has been proven wrong, would you like to take the opportunity to retract that threat?
So now you need to apologise for slandering me by attributing comments i did not make.


I saw your comment. You were not so subtly alluding to arson.

Ian, why do you always straight up deny what you've said? Is it part of your PD?
Back to top
 

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 151180
Gender: male
Re: Bendigo Mosque recieves final go-ahead
Reply #192 - Jun 23rd, 2016 at 2:58pm
 
mothra wrote on Jun 23rd, 2016 at 2:53pm:
ian wrote on Jun 21st, 2016 at 11:21pm:
polite_gandalf wrote on Jun 21st, 2016 at 2:25pm:
I deliberately omitted the Geelong mosque because it was an old church, and presumably was targeted as a church.

So, anyway - Ian, given that your one justification for threatening arson against mosques has been proven wrong, would you like to take the opportunity to retract that threat?
So now you need to apologise for slandering me by attributing comments i did not make.


I saw your comment. You were not so subtly alluding to arson.

Ian, why do you always straight up deny what you've said? Is it part of your PD?


He's a coward and a liar.
Back to top
 

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 57424
Gender: male
Re: Bendigo Mosque recieves final go-ahead
Reply #193 - Jun 23rd, 2016 at 6:04pm
 
Brian Ross wrote on Jun 20th, 2016 at 8:46pm:
Frank wrote on Jun 20th, 2016 at 8:38pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Jun 20th, 2016 at 8:31pm:
*YAWN*, you're boring in your bigotry against Muslims, Frank, dead boring.    Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes



You 'inspired' the spineless apologist thread a few years ago.  Nothing has changed. You are still the queen of squishy, unprincipled bend-over apoligism for Islam.


Sad and disgusting for a grown man - if that's what you are.


http://static1.comicvine.com/uploads/scale_super/12/122743/2332811-yawn_20smiley...

Such childishness, Frank.   Such schoolyard ad homimum debate.   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

The truth always puts you to sleep, Achkhchmed Ross.

PS
Homimum, you silly pedant? Homimum?  WHat a two-faced, hypochritical, double and triple standard, laughably dishonest, lying and stupid prat you are.

Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 46311
Re: Bendigo Mosque recieves final go-ahead
Reply #194 - Jun 23rd, 2016 at 6:40pm
 
Frank wrote on Jun 23rd, 2016 at 6:04pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Jun 20th, 2016 at 8:46pm:
Frank wrote on Jun 20th, 2016 at 8:38pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Jun 20th, 2016 at 8:31pm:
*YAWN*, you're boring in your bigotry against Muslims, Frank, dead boring.    Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes



You 'inspired' the spineless apologist thread a few years ago.  Nothing has changed. You are still the queen of squishy, unprincipled bend-over apoligism for Islam.


Sad and disgusting for a grown man - if that's what you are.


http://static1.comicvine.com/uploads/scale_super/12/122743/2332811-yawn_20smiley...

Such childishness, Frank.   Such schoolyard ad homimum debate.   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

The truth always puts you to sleep, Achkhchmed Ross.

PS
Homimum, you silly pedant? Homimum?  WHat a two-faced, hypochritical, double and triple standard, laughably dishonest, lying and stupid prat you are.




You're right, Frank.  I typed too quickly without thinking.  It should be "ad hominem",  shouldn't it?   Embarrassed Embarrassed Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

It seems that I have upset a Moderator and are forbidden from using posting to the general forum now. So much for Freedom of Speech. Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 11 12 13 14 
Send Topic Print