Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 
Send Topic Print
Expert: Scientists exaggerated coral bleaching GBR (Read 7092 times)
Gnads
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 32745
Gender: male
Re: Expert: Scientists exaggerated coral bleaching GBR
Reply #15 - Jun 5th, 2016 at 11:48am
 
The_Barnacle wrote on Jun 5th, 2016 at 11:27am:
Gnads wrote on Jun 4th, 2016 at 5:30pm:
There was never ever 95% bleaching of the entire reef.

There were perhaps small areas that could have had that sort of bleaching ....

but to say the entire reef was always a fabrication.


Thats right it was a fabrication by the conservative commentators. 
Because no one actually said that.

What they said was that 95% of the northern reef was bleached.

So all we are arguing about is the extent of the bleaching. This article by the Murdoch press still admits that a quarter of the entire reef has been killed by bleaching. That is still a very serious event no matter what spin they want to put on it.



And that to... is bullshyte.

What was actually said was certain areas of the northern reef had up to 95% bleaching

if the entire northern reef had 95% bleaching then it would be in the same predicament as I stated

"virtually unsavable, ruined beyond repair"

It has been stated that areas that have been bleached will be reseeded from the untouched northern reefs.

This whole reef bleaching claims is typical scaremongering propaganda.

Back to top
 

"When you are dead, you do not know you are dead. It's only painful and difficult for others. The same applies when you are stupid." ~ Ricky Gervais
 
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 19808
Gender: male
Re: Expert: Scientists exaggerated coral bleaching GBR
Reply #16 - Jun 5th, 2016 at 12:47pm
 
From the report -
Quote:
'Dr Reichelt said the vast bulk of bleaching damage was confined to the far northern section off Cape York, which had the best prospect of recovery due to the lack of ­onshore development and high water quality.'


Which contradicts claims of poor water quality by GBRMPA.

Quote:
Water quality is one of the biggest threats to the Great Barrier Reef, according to Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority (GBRMPA) water quality manager Leigh Gray.


http://www.abc.net.au/local/stories/2015/09/08/4308239.htm

Quote:
“However, based on our ­combined results so far, the overall mortality rate is 22 per cent — and about 85 per cent of that die-off has occurred in the far north ­between the tip of Cape York and just north of Lizard Island, 250km north of Cairns. Seventy-five per cent of the reef will come out in a few months time as recovered.”
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 19808
Gender: male
Re: Expert: Scientists exaggerated coral bleaching GBR
Reply #17 - Jun 20th, 2016 at 11:12pm
 
'An Australian university recently censured marine scientist Paul Ridd for “failing to act in a collegial way and in the academic spirit of the institution,” because he questioned popular claims among environmentalists about coral reefs and global warming.

What was Ridd’s crime? He found out two of the world’s leading organizations studying coral reefs were using misleading photographs to make the case that global warming was causing a mass reef die-off. Ridd wasn’t rewarded for checking the facts and blowing the whistle on misleading science. Instead, James Cook University censured Ridd and threatened to fire him for questioning global warming orthodoxy.'
http://dailycaller.com/2016/06/13/university-censures-science-prof-for-fact-chec...

If you can't use the data - fake it.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Belgarion
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6058
Gender: male
Re: Expert: Scientists exaggerated coral bleaching GBR
Reply #18 - Jun 21st, 2016 at 9:38am
 
The acolytes of the Warmist religion will tolerate no heresy. Contradict the word of their prophets at your peril! Cheesy
Back to top
 

"I may not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it."

Voltaire.....(possibly)
 
IP Logged
 
Belgarion
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6058
Gender: male
Re: Expert: Scientists exaggerated coral bleaching GBR
Reply #19 - Jun 21st, 2016 at 9:39am
 
.
Back to top
 

"I may not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it."

Voltaire.....(possibly)
 
IP Logged
 
Valkie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 16173
Central Coast
Gender: male
Re: Expert: Scientists exaggerated coral bleaching GBR
Reply #20 - Jun 21st, 2016 at 10:52am
 
Its called lying

In order to prop up their ever increasing pay packets and numbers, climate scientist will
Fabricate,
Extrapolate on faulty data,
Fiddle the data and stats.
Manipulate
and just outright lie about everything they possibly can.

Sort of like
Politicians
Multinationals
The RTA/RMA
and Muslims
Only on a more cerebral level than the aforementioned.
Back to top
 

I HAVE A DREAM
A WONDERFUL, PEACEFUL, BEAUTIFUL DREAM.
A DREAM OF A WORLD THAT HAS NEVER KNOWN ISLAM
A DREAM OF A WORLD FREE FROM THE HORRORS OF ISLAM.

SUCH A WONDERFUL DREAM
O HOW I WISH IT WERE TRU
 
IP Logged
 
Prime Minister for Canyons
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 26906
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: Expert: Scientists exaggerated coral bleaching GBR
Reply #21 - Jun 21st, 2016 at 11:13am
 
It is written by Graham Lloyd, so it has to be taken with a grain of salt.


For an environmental editor, hes pretty anti-environment.
Back to top
 

In a time of universal deceit — telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

No evidence whatsoever it can be attributed to George Orwell or Eric Arthur Blair (in fact the same guy)
 
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 19808
Gender: male
Re: Expert: Scientists exaggerated coral bleaching GBR
Reply #22 - Jun 21st, 2016 at 11:17am
 
Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jun 21st, 2016 at 11:13am:
It is written by Graham Lloyd, so it has to be taken with a grain of salt.


For an environmental editor, hes pretty anti-environment.



Perhaps you can come up with a piece exposing the lie? Wink
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Prime Minister for Canyons
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 26906
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: Expert: Scientists exaggerated coral bleaching GBR
Reply #23 - Jun 21st, 2016 at 11:21am
 
lee wrote on Jun 21st, 2016 at 11:17am:
Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jun 21st, 2016 at 11:13am:
It is written by Graham Lloyd, so it has to be taken with a grain of salt.


For an environmental editor, hes pretty anti-environment.



Perhaps you can come up with a piece exposing the lie? Wink



Not a lie, probably a slight context issue.
Back to top
 

In a time of universal deceit — telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

No evidence whatsoever it can be attributed to George Orwell or Eric Arthur Blair (in fact the same guy)
 
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 19808
Gender: male
Re: Expert: Scientists exaggerated coral bleaching GBR
Reply #24 - Jun 21st, 2016 at 11:28am
 
Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jun 21st, 2016 at 11:21am:
Not a lie, probably a slight context issue.



You mean not a lie just a slap on the wrist for parsing his thoughts wrongly? Spelling errors? Something like that?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Prime Minister for Canyons
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 26906
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: Expert: Scientists exaggerated coral bleaching GBR
Reply #25 - Jun 21st, 2016 at 11:29am
 
lee wrote on Jun 21st, 2016 at 11:28am:
Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jun 21st, 2016 at 11:21am:
Not a lie, probably a slight context issue.



You mean not a lie just a slap on the wrist for parsing his thoughts wrongly? Spelling errors? Something like that?




No, what about the phrase "context issue" do you not understand.
Back to top
 

In a time of universal deceit — telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

No evidence whatsoever it can be attributed to George Orwell or Eric Arthur Blair (in fact the same guy)
 
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 19808
Gender: male
Re: Expert: Scientists exaggerated coral bleaching GBR
Reply #26 - Jun 21st, 2016 at 11:33am
 
Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jun 21st, 2016 at 11:29am:
No, what about the phrase "context issue" do you not understand.



what was taken out of context? Paul Ridd's comments or JCU's censure?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Prime Minister for Canyons
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 26906
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: Expert: Scientists exaggerated coral bleaching GBR
Reply #27 - Jun 21st, 2016 at 11:40am
 
lee wrote on Jun 21st, 2016 at 11:33am:
Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jun 21st, 2016 at 11:29am:
No, what about the phrase "context issue" do you not understand.



what was taken out of context? Paul Ridd's comments or JCU's censure?



Russell Riecherts


Even if they werent though, surely the Park authority needs to publish its data
Back to top
 

In a time of universal deceit — telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

No evidence whatsoever it can be attributed to George Orwell or Eric Arthur Blair (in fact the same guy)
 
IP Logged
 
rabbitoh08
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 1528
Gender: male
Re: Expert: Scientists exaggerated coral bleaching GBR
Reply #28 - Jun 21st, 2016 at 12:06pm
 
lee wrote on Jun 5th, 2016 at 12:47pm:
From the report -
Quote:
'Dr Reichelt said the vast bulk of bleaching damage was confined to the far northern section off Cape York, which had the best prospect of recovery due to the lack of ­onshore development and high water quality.'


Which contradicts claims of poor water quality by GBRMPA.

Quote:
Water quality is one of the biggest threats to the Great Barrier Reef, according to Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority (GBRMPA) water quality manager Leigh Gray.


http://www.abc.net.au/local/stories/2015/09/08/4308239.htm

Quote:
“However, based on our ­combined results so far, the overall mortality rate is 22 per cent — and about 85 per cent of that die-off has occurred in the far north ­between the tip of Cape York and just north of Lizard Island, 250km north of Cairns. Seventy-five per cent of the reef will come out in a few months time as recovered.”

No. Reports of extensive bleaching in the northern GBR do not contradict claims of poor water quality by GBRMPA.

As usual, your gross ignorance has led to you cherry-pick from things you don't understand and jump to stupid conclusions.

You are confusing 2 essentially different issues, bleaching due to climate change and the impacts of poor water quality

As GBRMPA explains on this site:
http://www.gbrmpa.gov.au/managing-the-reef/how-the-reefs-managed/water-quality-i...
Catchment run-off and associated water quality is identified as the second most significant pressure on the Great Barrier Reef and is expected to have significant compounding effects with climate change.

So - Water quality is one of the biggest threats to the Great Barrier Reef, in fact - it is identified as the second most significant pressure on the Great Barrier Reef.

Yes - the recent reports on coral bleaching due to increasing water temperatures has been badly reported in many instances - but it is still a simple fact that warming waters due to AGW are having significant impact on the reef, especially in the northern sector
...
https://www.coralcoe.org.au/media-releases/only-7-of-the-great-barrier-reef-has-...
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 19808
Gender: male
Re: Expert: Scientists exaggerated coral bleaching GBR
Reply #29 - Jun 21st, 2016 at 12:09pm
 
Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jun 21st, 2016 at 11:40am:
lee wrote on Jun 21st, 2016 at 11:33am:
Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jun 21st, 2016 at 11:29am:
No, what about the phrase "context issue" do you not understand.



what was taken out of context? Paul Ridd's comments or JCU's censure?



Russell Riecherts


Even if they werent though, surely the Park authority needs to publish its data


Russell Riecherts? Please explain.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 
Send Topic Print