Lionel Edriess
|
The alternative to the 'Bomb' was land warfare. It was a difficult decision and not taken lightly.
After their experiences in the Pacific, the Americans were loathe to engage in such an action, for a number of reasons, chief of which was the expected casualties on both sides - including citizens,
Japan is not a continent like Europe, Australia or the US. it would have meant island-hopping all the way.
Recommended viewing is 'The Pacific', a 2010 HBO miniseries. It might well bestow a few insights. Eastwood's movies on Iwo Jima provide others.
The bombs, unfortunately, killed hundreds of thousands. Without their use, multiples of that number would have suffered horrific deaths.
Very likely, Japan would have starved to death before it was beaten.
The Japanese were very different foes to the Germans.
Have the possible consequences of the 'Cold War' escaped anyone? Or the real threat presented by today's Jihadists?
WWII is ancient history.
Was Fromelles, now in it's centenary, any less horrific?
Dip your hands in the steaming guts of war over the millennia, it's never 'nice'.
Take note, Marla, your own Civil War has killed more Americans than any other.
|