Australian Politics Forum - a mindless collective of treacherous Jews

Frank Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 49863 Gender:	Re: a mindless collective of treacherous Jews Reply #390 - May 19^th, 2018 at 7:26pm The Palestinian lie. Or: “…and lo, the dead shall rise to scratch their noses…” https://twitter.com/zalmanwolff/status/996521052175028224
Back to top	Estragon: I can’t go on like this. Vladimir: That’s what you think. IP Logged

polite_gandalf

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 20027
Canberra
Gender: male

Re: a mindless collective of treacherous Jews
Reply #391 - May 21^st, 2018 at 1:39pm

freediver wrote on May 16^th, 2018 at 4:19pm:

polite_gandalf wrote on May 16^th, 2018 at 4:15pm:

freediver wrote on May 15^th, 2018 at 10:27pm:

freediver wrote on Mar 8^th, 2018 at 6:54pm:

Gandalf's at it again:

polite_gandalf wrote on Mar 8^th, 2018 at 1:06pm:

Yes, but FD's interested in the deeper meaning of what muslims say. For example, when a muslim says he opposes punishing gays for being gay - FD knows he really means he wants to kill gays who do it mardi gras style.

You really should learn how to listen to muslims like FD does - then you'll realise that your bearded numpty who seemingly said that ISIS were against Quranic teachings, really said that ISIS are awesome - and also that gays should be slaughtered en masse and that Muhammad killed 700 jews in a day for being a mindless collective - and thats a-ok.

Was it a-ok for Muhammad to slaughter those Jews Gandalf?

You can get a sense of how FD's immigration screening test will go...

Does it involve Muslims not giving any straight answers to the questions?

Undoubtedly. Which will just confirm their guilt. Any suspect muslim applicant who can't give a straight "Muhammad was a murderous, pedophilic bastard" answer, has only themselves to blame when they are rejected.

Back to top

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:

Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.

IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 97654

Re: a mindless collective of treacherous Jews
Reply #392 - May 21^st, 2018 at 5:28pm

polite_gandalf wrote on May 21^st, 2018 at 1:39pm:

freediver wrote on May 16^th, 2018 at 4:19pm:

polite_gandalf wrote on May 16^th, 2018 at 4:15pm:

freediver wrote on May 15^th, 2018 at 10:27pm:

freediver wrote on Mar 8^th, 2018 at 6:54pm:

Gandalf's at it again:

polite_gandalf wrote on Mar 8^th, 2018 at 1:06pm:

Yes, but FD's interested in the deeper meaning of what muslims say. For example, when a muslim says he opposes punishing gays for being gay - FD knows he really means he wants to kill gays who do it mardi gras style.

You really should learn how to listen to muslims like FD does - then you'll realise that your bearded numpty who seemingly said that ISIS were against Quranic teachings, really said that ISIS are awesome - and also that gays should be slaughtered en masse and that Muhammad killed 700 jews in a day for being a mindless collective - and thats a-ok.

Was it a-ok for Muhammad to slaughter those Jews Gandalf?

You can get a sense of how FD's immigration screening test will go...

Does it involve Muslims not giving any straight answers to the questions?

Undoubtedly. Which will just confirm their guilt. Any suspect muslim applicant who can't give a straight "Muhammad was a murderous, pedophilic bastard" answer, has only themselves to blame when they are rejected.

You see? You know the right answer to FD's questions. If you said that, he wouldn't accuse you of evasion.

Where is FD, by the way?

Back to top

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 49863
Gender: male

Re: a mindless collective of treacherous Jews
Reply #393 - May 21^st, 2018 at 7:36pm

polite_gandalf wrote on May 21^st, 2018 at 1:39pm:

freediver wrote on May 16^th, 2018 at 4:19pm:

polite_gandalf wrote on May 16^th, 2018 at 4:15pm:

freediver wrote on May 15^th, 2018 at 10:27pm:

freediver wrote on Mar 8^th, 2018 at 6:54pm:

Gandalf's at it again:

polite_gandalf wrote on Mar 8^th, 2018 at 1:06pm:

Yes, but FD's interested in the deeper meaning of what muslims say. For example, when a muslim says he opposes punishing gays for being gay - FD knows he really means he wants to kill gays who do it mardi gras style.

You really should learn how to listen to muslims like FD does - then you'll realise that your bearded numpty who seemingly said that ISIS were against Quranic teachings, really said that ISIS are awesome - and also that gays should be slaughtered en masse and that Muhammad killed 700 jews in a day for being a mindless collective - and thats a-ok.

Was it a-ok for Muhammad to slaughter those Jews Gandalf?

You can get a sense of how FD's immigration screening test will go...

Does it involve Muslims not giving any straight answers to the questions?

Undoubtedly. Which will just confirm their guilt. Any suspect muslim applicant who can't give a straight "Muhammad was a murderous, pedophilic bastard" answer, has only themselves to blame when they are rejected.

You satirise it - try to, rather - but of course you know you have put your finger on it.

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

Aussie Gold Member Online OzPolitic Posts: 38987 Gender:	Re: a mindless collective of treacherous Jews Reply #394 - May 21^st, 2018 at 7:41pm Quote: You satirise it - try to, rather - but of course you know you have put your finger on it. Not even an attempt at anything other that strident and relevant sarcasm, but also dripping with irony, Sore End.
Back to top	IP Logged

Karnal Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 97654	Re: a mindless collective of treacherous Jews Reply #395 - May 21^st, 2018 at 9:02pm FD?
Back to top	IP Logged

freediver

Gold Member

Offline

www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49867
At my desk.

Re: a mindless collective of treacherous Jews
Reply #396 - May 21^st, 2018 at 9:31pm

polite_gandalf wrote on May 21^st, 2018 at 1:39pm:

freediver wrote on May 16^th, 2018 at 4:19pm:

polite_gandalf wrote on May 16^th, 2018 at 4:15pm:

freediver wrote on May 15^th, 2018 at 10:27pm:

freediver wrote on Mar 8^th, 2018 at 6:54pm:

Gandalf's at it again:

polite_gandalf wrote on Mar 8^th, 2018 at 1:06pm:

Yes, but FD's interested in the deeper meaning of what muslims say. For example, when a muslim says he opposes punishing gays for being gay - FD knows he really means he wants to kill gays who do it mardi gras style.

You really should learn how to listen to muslims like FD does - then you'll realise that your bearded numpty who seemingly said that ISIS were against Quranic teachings, really said that ISIS are awesome - and also that gays should be slaughtered en masse and that Muhammad killed 700 jews in a day for being a mindless collective - and thats a-ok.

Was it a-ok for Muhammad to slaughter those Jews Gandalf?

You can get a sense of how FD's immigration screening test will go...

Does it involve Muslims not giving any straight answers to the questions?

Undoubtedly. Which will just confirm their guilt. Any suspect muslim applicant who can't give a straight "Muhammad was a murderous, pedophilic bastard" answer, has only themselves to blame when they are rejected.

Let's try a true or false question.

Were they a mindless collective of treacherous Jews?

Back to top

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.

IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 97654

Re: a mindless collective of treacherous Jews
Reply #397 - May 21^st, 2018 at 10:13pm

freediver wrote on May 21^st, 2018 at 9:31pm:

polite_gandalf wrote on May 21^st, 2018 at 1:39pm:

freediver wrote on May 16^th, 2018 at 4:19pm:

polite_gandalf wrote on May 16^th, 2018 at 4:15pm:

freediver wrote on May 15^th, 2018 at 10:27pm:

freediver wrote on Mar 8^th, 2018 at 6:54pm:

Gandalf's at it again:

polite_gandalf wrote on Mar 8^th, 2018 at 1:06pm:

Yes, but FD's interested in the deeper meaning of what muslims say. For example, when a muslim says he opposes punishing gays for being gay - FD knows he really means he wants to kill gays who do it mardi gras style.

You really should learn how to listen to muslims like FD does - then you'll realise that your bearded numpty who seemingly said that ISIS were against Quranic teachings, really said that ISIS are awesome - and also that gays should be slaughtered en masse and that Muhammad killed 700 jews in a day for being a mindless collective - and thats a-ok.

Was it a-ok for Muhammad to slaughter those Jews Gandalf?

You can get a sense of how FD's immigration screening test will go...

Does it involve Muslims not giving any straight answers to the questions?

Undoubtedly. Which will just confirm their guilt. Any suspect muslim applicant who can't give a straight "Muhammad was a murderous, pedophilic bastard" answer, has only themselves to blame when they are rejected.

Let's try a true or false question.

Were they a mindless collective of treacherous Jews?

There you are. Now what do we call people who refuse to answer questions?

Back to top

IP Logged

polite_gandalf

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 20027
Canberra
Gender: male

Re: a mindless collective of treacherous Jews
Reply #398 - May 22^nd, 2018 at 2:06pm

Here's a question you forgot to answer before FD:

polite_gandalf wrote on Mar 8^th, 2018 at 1:40pm:

freediver wrote on Mar 4^th, 2018 at 10:27am:

polite_gandalf wrote on Mar 2^nd, 2018 at 2:02pm:

freediver wrote on Feb 28^th, 2018 at 9:58pm:

polite_gandalf wrote on Feb 28^th, 2018 at 9:57am:

Karnal wrote on Feb 27^th, 2018 at 11:25pm:

And don't forget the transcripts of the trial of the 200 Jews Moh killed in a day, G.

There you go. Couldn't have put it better myself. FD has no problem whatsoever taking as gospel truth the account of a single secondary source who was regarded by his peers as unreliable at best. Yet mention a treaty that is widely accepted by historians - he's all "oooh, no evidence!"

Also, FD are you saying it was ok for the Qurayza to conspire in secret to launch a surprise attack against your own city - on the basis that there was no treaty saying they wouldn't?

You are lying again Gandalf. What exactly is "widely accepted by historians"?

So for arguments sake, if it didn't exist - are you saying it was therefore ok for the QUrayza to conspire in secret to launch a surprise attack against your own city?

Actually yes. Muhammad was a piece of crap and should have been killed, even if that meant killing his henchmen to get to him. He was making a lucrative career out of murdering innocent people and stealing their goods. He was making life hell for the Jews. He had already kicked 2 of the 3 large tribes of Jews out of Medina. It was a clear policy of divide and conquer. And he had made his intentions quite clear by publicly announcing to the Jews that he would slaughter them if they did not convert to Islam. This was back when all 3 tribes were still there. So we have a political leader murdering and stealing. We have a politically leader openly threatening the Jews with genocide if they did not convert. And we have a political leader following through with those threats. There was a clear moral justification to kill Muhammad, just as there was with Hitler, and it is one of the greatest shames of history that they failed.

But that is of course beside the original point. You lied about the treaty. And now you will not say what exactly is "widely accepted" by historians. Your excuses for Muhammad's genocide are one lie after another, and you chop and change your lies as you get called out on them.

So, just to be clear here FD - are you now saying they did backstab Muhammad in the end - or merely that they would have been morally justified to do so? Either way, its strange that you've spent the last 2 years or more arguing so strenuously that the Qurayza definitely did nothing wrong vis dishonoring any agreement they might have had with Muhammad. It almost seemed like you considered this important at the time.

Back to top

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:

Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.

IP Logged

Bobby. Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 109419 Melbourne Gender:	Re: a mindless collective of treacherous Jews Reply #399 - May 22^nd, 2018 at 5:31pm dear Gandalf, may I ask you a personal question? Do you like Jews?
Back to top	IP Logged

freediver

Gold Member

Offline

www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49867
At my desk.

Re: a mindless collective of treacherous Jews
Reply #400 - May 22^nd, 2018 at 6:44pm

polite_gandalf wrote on May 22^nd, 2018 at 2:06pm:

Here's a question you forgot to answer before FD:

polite_gandalf wrote on Mar 8^th, 2018 at 1:40pm:

freediver wrote on Mar 4^th, 2018 at 10:27am:

polite_gandalf wrote on Mar 2^nd, 2018 at 2:02pm:

freediver wrote on Feb 28^th, 2018 at 9:58pm:

polite_gandalf wrote on Feb 28^th, 2018 at 9:57am:

Karnal wrote on Feb 27^th, 2018 at 11:25pm:

And don't forget the transcripts of the trial of the 200 Jews Moh killed in a day, G.

There you go. Couldn't have put it better myself. FD has no problem whatsoever taking as gospel truth the account of a single secondary source who was regarded by his peers as unreliable at best. Yet mention a treaty that is widely accepted by historians - he's all "oooh, no evidence!"

Also, FD are you saying it was ok for the Qurayza to conspire in secret to launch a surprise attack against your own city - on the basis that there was no treaty saying they wouldn't?

You are lying again Gandalf. What exactly is "widely accepted by historians"?

So for arguments sake, if it didn't exist - are you saying it was therefore ok for the QUrayza to conspire in secret to launch a surprise attack against your own city?

Actually yes. Muhammad was a piece of crap and should have been killed, even if that meant killing his henchmen to get to him. He was making a lucrative career out of murdering innocent people and stealing their goods. He was making life hell for the Jews. He had already kicked 2 of the 3 large tribes of Jews out of Medina. It was a clear policy of divide and conquer. And he had made his intentions quite clear by publicly announcing to the Jews that he would slaughter them if they did not convert to Islam. This was back when all 3 tribes were still there. So we have a political leader murdering and stealing. We have a politically leader openly threatening the Jews with genocide if they did not convert. And we have a political leader following through with those threats. There was a clear moral justification to kill Muhammad, just as there was with Hitler, and it is one of the greatest shames of history that they failed.

But that is of course beside the original point. You lied about the treaty. And now you will not say what exactly is "widely accepted" by historians. Your excuses for Muhammad's genocide are one lie after another, and you chop and change your lies as you get called out on them.

So, just to be clear here FD - are you now saying they did backstab Muhammad in the end - or merely that they would have been morally justified to do so? Either way, its strange that you've spent the last 2 years or more arguing so strenuously that the Qurayza definitely did nothing wrong vis dishonoring any agreement they might have had with Muhammad. It almost seemed like you considered this important at the time.

Like the Ides of March? Are you asking me whether all 800 of them got a stab in? Or do you just want me to join in your absurd anti semitic propaganda, despite it not actually meaning anything?

Do you think weeding out potential immigrants who are ideologically opposed to freedom and democracy discriminates against Muslims because they tend towards an inability to give a straight answer? To questions like:

Were they a mindless collective of treacherous Jews?

Back to top

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.

IP Logged

Aussie Gold Member Online OzPolitic Posts: 38987 Gender:	Re: a mindless collective of treacherous Jews Reply #401 - May 22^nd, 2018 at 6:48pm Depending on your answer, Effendi, Mr Dutton will decide whether to send you to Manus. Quote: Were they a mindless collective of treacherous Jews? Do you reckon they were?
Back to top	IP Logged

freediver Gold Member Offline www.ozpolitic.com Posts: 49867 At my desk.	Re: a mindless collective of treacherous Jews Reply #402 - May 22^nd, 2018 at 6:57pm Of course not. That's a stupid thing to say. What about you Aussie?
Back to top	People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words. IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Online

OzPolitic

Posts: 38987
Gender: male

Re: a mindless collective of treacherous Jews
Reply #403 - May 22^nd, 2018 at 7:01pm

freediver wrote on May 22^nd, 2018 at 6:57pm:

Of course not. That's a stupid thing to say.

What about you Aussie?

Jayzuz!!! I claim the precious! Effendi finally answered a question!

Yay me!

As for me.....I have no idea what happened all those centuries ago so I will demur in confessed ignorance.

I see your number has reduced to 800. Jolly good.

Back to top

« Last Edit: May 22^nd, 2018 at 7:18pm by Aussie »

IP Logged

freediver Gold Member Offline www.ozpolitic.com Posts: 49867 At my desk.	Re: a mindless collective of treacherous Jews Reply #404 - May 22^nd, 2018 at 7:07pm Do they need some kind of certificate to say they were not a mindless collective Aussie? What about the holocaust victims? Do you know if they were a mindless collective of treacherous Jews? Make sure you have evidence ready to back up your answer.
Back to top	People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words. IP Logged