I hope they catch this creep and deport him

The 17-year-old girl was on her way to school during Wednesday morning's peak when a man, described as wearing sunglasses and possibly a black turtleneck, put his hand under the girl's skirt and allegedly indecently assaulted her.

http://m.smh.com.au/nsw/teenage-girl-allegedly-indecently-assaulted-on-crowded-s...

cods wrote on May 26^th, 2016 at 7:37am:


More of a shame you posted that moronic comment.

You an (alleged) rape apologist these days, aquaman?

Sounds like you wish to apologize for their horrendous criminal actions.

Nope, i wish to prevent their horrendous criminal actions.

in the first chapter of Emotional Intelligence (a ground breaking book) the author talks about a case where a youth bumps into another youth on the sidewalk and the push turns to shove turns to anger turns to both pulling out guns , turns to a double homicide.

without control of our emotional state, bad things happen.

Young men need to be taught to "control their emotional state" they need to be taught "proper masculinity" they need to be taught "mindfulness and skillfulness" in their actions.

this was the action of an emotionally weak, mindless, unskillful person who does not understand true masculinity and sexuality.

you can just lock them all up, but you better build a big jail.
far better to let men teach men about the skillsets they need to navigate the current social paradigm.
this is currently not being done and society will continue to suffer until it is .

aquascoot wrote on May 26^th, 2016 at 8:24am:



Riiiighhhht. By apologizing for them.

GordyL wrote on May 26^th, 2016 at 8:20am:



Exactly. The details are not in. She could have been life threatened at knifepoint or the alleged attacker could have seriously harmed others on the train if confronted by those who have zero experience in what to do in such a situation.

cods wrote on May 26^th, 2016 at 8:27am:


Perhaps she was a very immature 17 year old, everyone reacts differently. Even some adults totally lock up when put in a confrontational situation.

Marla wrote on May 26^th, 2016 at 8:37am:



you are very angry, emotional and cannot relate from a mindful stillness.
this is the very 'animal" mentality i have told you needs to be extinguished. yet it is the mentality you choose to live in.
what you resist persists.
there is no way forward from your current mindset, you are stymied

aquascoot wrote on May 26^th, 2016 at 8:44am:


If I'm upset about anything it's your constant inability to properly answer a god damn question. I should know better.


aquascoot wrote on May 26^th, 2016 at 8:44am:


More rape apology.

Marla wrote on May 26^th, 2016 at 8:47am:



It is not my resonsibility to answer a question.
That is a leecher mentality.

I see myself as the sun giving off pure clean energy.
If people on the internet dont validate my energy, it is of no consequence.
You have to start seeing yourself, not as a human but as an entity.
think of yourself more as an awesome small business or an awesome club.

You construct an awesome ecosystem within the club and you radiate out your increasingly awesome position.

If people are outside the club getting all butt hurt because you wont let them in, you are oblivious to it.

new people are always welcome in the club, welcome in the ecosystem....but they have to contribute positive energy and come with a sense of mindfulness and contribution.

Bratty behaviour simply is not tolerated.
Strong bouncers patrol the door and will only allow you in to interact if you fulfil certain criteria of awesomeness.

anger, emotional instability and animal mindfulness do not sit well with my personal bouncers 

aquascoot wrote on May 26^th, 2016 at 9:00am:


I'm sure you do.

However, others see you more like this:

GordyL wrote on May 26^th, 2016 at 7:28am:


why? just put him under the train

Depends on the situation.  If the man is obviously physically bigger, and there is no one around, then cut your losses and run!

If the man is not so big, and there are plenty of people around.  Then talk very loudly "DONT touch me."  That usually works.

What a sad thread.

Here we have a pervert, preying on a schoolgirl and what do people do.
Blame the girl,
Defend the man based on the way he has been molded by society.
Even blame the other passengers.

Everyone knows right from wrong, inherently.
He would have known that his actions were wrong.

But we, as a society so in fear of punishing anybody for fear of hurting their feelings, allow this poo to go on.

If it had been my daughter, I would have been riding that train until I found the creep, and after finding him, he would loose the urge to touch a woman again, in fact he wouldn't be capable of ever having children and if he was really lucky he may even walk again one day.

We need more vigilantes.

Do we know what colour or nationality the train driver is yet?

Mr Hammer would like needs to know.

There appears to be a higher than normal incidence of sexual molestation by these illegal immigrants than in society in general.
Not in numbers, but in percentages.

Is this because they have no control due to their low intelligence? (81)
Or is it because the countries they come from practice these perverted behaviors in normal life?

I believe that there is a more logical and insidious reason for this.
These people, these illegals, come here without their passports and without identification, because they have been  convicted of similar crimes or are on the run from the law in the countries from where they come.

Seeking to start afresh and perhaps start anew.
However, perversion is not so easily denied and especially so when low intelligence is rife (81)
They soon fall back into their perverted ways and we as a society suffer the consequences.

Recent demographics show that over 80% of illegals still have not found work five years into their infestation.
They are considerably higher represented in crime figures as a percentage of their number than any group in our great land.
They live off our welfare, screw the system and are far more vocal about any perceived slight against them, their cult or their perverted way of life than any group.

As a culture (and I use that term with tongue in cheek) they are sadly lacking in tolerance, manners, compassion and intelligence. (81)

They bring with them trouble, strife, indecency, insulting behavior and terrorism, why must we suffer this?

The time has come to start deporting these animals, if they cannot abide by our laws, our culture and our way of life, perhaps they just don't fit.
Perhaps they should be sent back to where these ways are the norm and let them suffer at the hands of their own draconian justice system.

Look at the stats buddy.

Listen to the news.

People are even beginning to expect that some form or sexual predication or perversion being perpetrated by our illegal immigrants when ever there is an attack...........in most cases they are right.

But I suppose that is normal for any cult that promotes the subjugation of females using disciplinary garb, genital mutilation, Honor killing, draconian punishments of females with none for males and an attitude of "its all right as long as they are infidels".

Perverted, sick, twisted and abhorrent people, get rid of em.

greggerypeccary wrote on May 27^th, 2016 at 6:55am:
There's been quite a few from asylum seekers both here and abroad.

greggerypeccary wrote on May 27^th, 2016 at 3:55pm:


So called asylum seekers and refugees, not the legal ones going through legal process are ipso facto ILLEGALS.

Only the twisted minds of the do gooders who have no idea of the trouble they are bringing into this country say otherwise.
They are ILLEGALLY entering our borders.
They are attempting to ILLEGALLY enter our country by ILLEGAL means.
And when they come here they continue with illegal ways.
They are ILLEGALS.
Anything else is pure bovine excreta.

As for you usual one liner "SHOW ME THE FACTS"
If you are so blind, so unaware and so deliberately obtuse as to not be aware of the facts, I can not help you.
Next you will be disputing the facts that more than 80% of ILLEGALS have no jobs after 5 years of being here.

If you want them here so badly, please, be my guest and sponsor them yourself. I don't want them or their like.

greggerypeccary wrote on May 27^th, 2016 at 4:14pm:


They are illegals little pecca, nobody is buying your nonsense.

Baronvonrort wrote on May 27^th, 2016 at 4:22pm:


Incorrect.

If you think otherwise, cite a reference to the relevant legislation that deems them to be "illegal".

Baronvonrort wrote on May 27^th, 2016 at 4:29pm:


Incorrect.

If you think otherwise, cite a reference to the relevant legislation that deems them to be "illegal".

Valkie wrote on May 27^th, 2016 at 5:12pm:


Incorrect.

If you think otherwise, cite a reference to the relevant legislation that deems them to be "illegal".

ILLEGALS

SEND EM HOME


VOLLEY

President Elect, The Mechanic wrote on May 28^th, 2016 at 6:49am:


If lip flapping and gum bumping from a supine position were lethal to the targets, the Mechanic would be invincible.

GordyL wrote on May 26^th, 2016 at 8:20am:


Hence, she should have screamed to alert those around her of an assault taking place.

Valkie wrote on May 26^th, 2016 at 5:16pm:




This offender was ..

A Third World immigrant and a Darkie .. and quite possibly a Pakistani Muslim.

And what this means is that if the law catches up with him, he has absolutely bugger-all to worry about, any more than the Middle Eastern and sub-continental taxi-drivers in the UK and Australia have anything to worry about when caught molesting women in their immediate vicinity.

And any more than the hundred or so Middle Eastern men who performed 'Taharrush Jamai' in Germany have anything to worry about after having been caught.

Welcome to the liberal-progressive ethos of our times.

Lord Herbert wrote on May 28^th, 2016 at 9:31pm:


Well, it would be correct in many other countries like North Korea.  But here in Australia, we have this tiny thing in the legal system, and that is:

You are innocent until proven guilty.   

... wrote on May 26^th, 2016 at 6:23pm:



It says:

The teenager told police her attacker as being "Indian or Sub-Continental" in appearance, about 30 years old, 180 centimetres tall, with an average build and short black hair.



Hang em and hang em high.

ian wrote on May 28^th, 2016 at 9:52pm:


The UN convention states clearly that: The UN Refugee Convention (to which Australia is a signatory) recognises that refugees have a lawful right to enter a country for the purposes of seeking asylum, regardless of how they arrive or whether they hold valid travel or identity documents. The Convention stipulates that what would usually be considered as illegal actions (e.g. entering a country without a visa) should not be treated as illegal if a person is seeking asylum.

Even though, it is technically an "illegal act", they are not considered as having performed an illegal act.   The asylum seekers were detailed, Not because they have committed an illegal act, it is because, our law states that anyone arrived by boat, will be mandatorily detailed, for purpose of process their claims - e.g. health and background checks.   

So there is a difference.  Let me give you a few example:

1. A man arrives at Sydney airport, with no papers, and wanted to stealthly sneak his way in.  He then committed an illegal act.  So, he will be detained because of this illegal act. 
2. A man arrives at Christmas Island from boat with no papers.  But he declared that he is an asylum seeker.  Therefore under the Australian law, he have not yet committed an illegal act until or if his processing have failed.  He was detained because our current law states that anyone in his situation be mandatorily detained. 

Re Ian

Mmmm okay.... 

Australian is a signatory to UN refugee convention.  Until we pull out of it, then as far as Australia law is concerned, the boat people have not committed an illegal act until / if when their processing have failed.

greggerypeccary wrote on May 29^th, 2016 at 1:44am:



Correct.

Ian is a troubled soul. If he knew twice as much as he claims to know he would still be dangerously intellectually bankrupt.

mothra wrote on May 29^th, 2016 at 2:11am:



ah.  more emotional outbursts aimed at ian .
you do keep going back to him seeking his attention over and over again.
this is always the case when the bratty girl meets an alpha male who she senses is "the champ"
she cant work out why she feels attraction but she just has to keep "at him" .
this falls into the topic of "why women fall for asshol*es", not that i think ian is an asshol*e, but Mothra does, yet she continues to engage with him over and over and over again.

the female seeking the comfort of being in the presense of an alpha male is there for all to see.

Ian may well be playing "push/pull" a very good technique.

women are very emotional creatures and they are as addicted to negative emotions as they are to positive emotions. (more they like a "range of emotions").

this topic (assylum seekers) is something that many women like mothra get all hot about, NOT because they care about assylum seekers at all, but because they are addicted to the emotions that these sort of arguements cause to flow thru them.
they love the emotional drama , as it "wakes them up".

they dont really care if its Joseph Koni or palestine or Naru.  its just an excuse to feel "something" to break out of the Durrr state of the non contributing leftard.

Leftards need to go to a place of contribution as a way to reach a more stable place of higher consciousness.
They could volunteer to go out and help homeless people or do something practical.

But this does not give the buzz of a full on Us v Them emotional outburst and it requires effort and commitment.

far easier to get your little hits of emotional heroin on an internet forum.

greggerypeccary wrote on May 29^th, 2016 at 8:04am:



gweg,  you have a good brain but you need to put it to use to achieve something more worthy then seeking little hits of stimulation from strangers on the internet.

i think this is why i associate with rightards (though i would consider buddhists and sherpas more spiritually enlightened).

becuase a rightard is generally someone who has gone thru brutal training and has come to realise that things dont happen "to" you, things happen "for" you.

to survive in business, you do have to grow into this emotionally more advanced mindset.

the mindset of the leftard is still very much, life it happening "to" me. i am a "victim" . i need to be a cry baby  about bullying or penalty rates or discrimination or minimum wage or police brutality or israel or border policy.....whenever i hear leftards talk on these topics, its just


cry baby
poor me
help me
please help me

and its really quite pathetic.

there is the path of the superior man and you cannot walk that path til you give up the failed , low consciousness mindset of the left.

sure its comfortable to "associate" with "pain".
But its even better to use pain and lessons as fuel to burn to drive you to the next level.

Man up sunshine 

greggerypeccary wrote on May 29^th, 2016 at 8:17am:



i am challenging you to read Ekhardt Tolles bestseller
A New Earth...and to renounce the devil that is low consciousness hateful emotional leftard ideology 

Mr Hammer wrote on May 27^th, 2016 at 3:02pm:


Heads will roll for this disgusting oversight in PC protocol. A sub-editor at media headquarters was sleeping on the job and let this racist! indiscretion slip through the net.

tickleandrose wrote on May 28^th, 2016 at 9:40pm:


Wrong! You have been sadly misinformed. 

There is a little thing called Presumption of Guilt which the police are empowered to assume WAY before the arrested party is marched into a court of law. If this wasn't so, then every arrested person who is ultimately judged to be innocent would be successfully suing the socks off the Police Department for wrongful arrest.

Boat people appearing in Australian sovereign waters are correctly deemed to be Illegal Immigrants until such time as they declare themselves to be seeking asylum from persecution. Until that moment, they ARE invaders of Australia's sovereign territory ...

tickleandrose wrote on May 28^th, 2016 at 9:40pm:



Unless of course you drive past a speed camera.
Then you are guilty until you prove your innocence.

Lord Herbert wrote on May 29^th, 2016 at 9:23am:


In Australia, our legal system is quiet robust.  There is this thing called wrongful arrest. 

Examples of an unlawful arrest may include

    Being arrested for possession of a small amount of prohibited drug
    Being acquitted of an offence where Police didn't properly investigate a matter before arresting
    Being arrested and then being released after processing without being given any bail conditions
    Being asked to come down to the station for a "chat" and then going down voluntarily and then being arrested when you get there
    Presenting yourself at the station after a Police Officer leaves a message for you to contact them
    Being arrested for no reason at all, other than failing the "attitude test"
    Being arrested so Police can interview you
    Being arrested so the Police can identify you
    Being arrested even though the Police know who you are and where you live, and Court proceedings could have been started by serving a Court Attendance Notice rather than by arrest and charging.
    Excessive force being used during the arrest which otherwise might have been lawful.
    Being arrested because Police mistakenly thought there was a warrant out for your arrest.
    Being arrested days or weeks after an event, with no concern for victims or witnesses

And yes, if wrongful arrest or detention occurs, and the victim can demonstrate material damages, then they are entitled to compensation.   Well, at least this is our legal system currently.

Well, lets do a little role play involving Mr Herbert   

Its a lazy Sunday morning, when Mr Herbert was awoke from his dreams of how he wanted to deem all asylum seekers illegal.  He was about to smile in victory when the front door to his home got bust down, and next thing he knew it, he was talking to a police officer across the interview table.

Herbert: why am I here?  you have no right! 

Police: you know what you have done Mr Herbert!  Now fess it up!

Herbert: this is rediculous!  I havent done anything.

Police: Last night, a lady was murdered in <generic suburb>, and her body parts were found this morning in <generic suburb>.   

Herbert: so? That doesnt prove anything!

Police: We got records from the mobile phone companies.  You are one of 5 people whose mobile phone had passed through the relevant phone towers.   So, you have 20% chance that you are guilty!

Herbert: But this is absurd.  I am innocent.

Police: In Australia, you are presumed guilty until proven otherwise!  Now, you will be transported to a detention camp in Alice Spring, until we can find out that you are innocent, we cannot let you back on the streets.

Herbert: for how long.... (he choked back his shock and despair)

Police: for until you are found innocent. 

Worry not Mr Herbert.  I will be outside with my friends picketing for your release.   

aquascoot wrote on May 29^th, 2016 at 8:01am:



Just so you know, I didn't bother reading that.

I read the first paragraph and quickly realised it was a load of horse poo.

I'll just bet horse boy is a virgin. No idea about women at all.

Lord Herbert wrote on May 29^th, 2016 at 8:35pm:


Or she may just want to debate politics on an Internet forum without it being assumed she is here seeking the attention of the forum males.

Lord Herbert wrote on May 29^th, 2016 at 9:14pm:


If Karnal was a horse

The teenager told police her attacker as being "Indian or Sub-Continental" in appearance, about 30 years old, 180 centimetres tall, with an average build and short black hair.



Hang em and hang em high.

ian wrote on May 29^th, 2016 at 10:28pm:


Oh My God
You advocate Australia taking every deadbeat, poorly educated, religiously twisted, retard that has been kicked out of their cesspits into Australia just because they can??????????

Surely we, as taxpayers, have the right to say no to this influx of parasites that destroy our culture in the name of a devil worshiping cult?

If there was a referendum, there would be no more, but the piss weak politicians have to play the UN game and put Australians at risk so that they can look good.
They never see the parasites because they are nowhere near where they live.

Give the people a voice.
Put forward a referendum and lets see what happens.

Lord Herbert wrote on May 30^th, 2016 at 6:29pm:



There is no hope then.

we is doomed, ,

Guess Ill just have to play the system and live life easy and expect everyone else to pay for me and mine.

Dont think Ill bother working anymore
Just live off the dole and find ways to screw the system,

Whats that you say?....... Bludger?.......That's insulting and racist.
What? .......You think I'm a parasite?..........That's discrimination based on age and socioeconomic situation.
I feel sooooo abused, better give me some more handouts so I can feel better.

aquascoot wrote on May 31^st, 2016 at 10:09am:
I agree with every word you wrote auqa. It's foolish to underestimate the power of social cohesion. It will bite Australia in the ass the way it is biting all multicultural countries in the ass right now.

Laugh till you cry wrote on May 31^st, 2016 at 10:33am:


What a pathetic sycophantic wretch. Grow a set! [/quote]Aqua is a great poster Indian Boy. You on the other hand are a racist knob head.