A common sight - a cringing Greenie.

Back before man-made climate change was frying Australia, when CO2 was around 300ppm, the continentsavoured an ideal pre-industrial climate. RIGHT?

This is the kind of climate we are spending $10bn/year to get back too Right again?

We are told today’s climate has more records and more extremes than times gone by, but the few records we have from the early 1800’s are eye-popping.  Things were not just hotter, but so wildly hot it burst thermometers.

The earliest temperature records we have shown that Australia was a land of shocking heat waves and droughts, except for when it was bitterly cold or raging in flood.

In other words, nothing has changed, except possibly things might not be quite so hot now!

Silliggy (Lance Pidgeon) has been researching records from early explorers and from newspapers.  What he’s uncovered is fascinating! It’s as if history is being erased!

For all that we hear about recent record-breaking climate extremes, records that are equally extreme, and sometimes even more so, are ignored.

In January 1896 a savage blast “like a furnace” stretched across Australia from east to west and lasted for weeks.  The death toll reached 437 people in the eastern states.

Newspaper reports showed that in Bourke the heat approached 120°F (48.9°C) on three days.





On Earth Day we should Celebrate The True Green Fuels...hydrocarbons and nuclear
VIV FORBES Sat 23 Apr 2016 01:53:28 pm 365 COMMENTS

The Carbon Sense Coalition today urged people to celebrate the true green fuels – oil, coal, gas, nuclear and, in places, geothermal & hydro. The Chairman of “Carbon Sense”, Mr Viv Forbes, said in a Press release this week that these fuels have reduced man’s pressure on the environment to such an extent that they should be celebrated on “Earth Day”.

Mr Forbes said:
"It was petroleum that provided the kerosene that replaced whale oil in lamps and greatly reduced the slaughter of whales."

"Coal saved the forests that were being cut down for smelters, forges, charcoal, heaters and stoves. Steel made with coke then replaced wood for mine props, bridges and tall buildings. As steam engines & iron ships replaced wooden wind-jammers in world navies & merchant fleets, the forests expanded."

"Coal gas & clean coal cured the smogs of London & Pittsburgh. Piped gas for home heating & street lighting & the even better “clean-coal-by-wire” (coal powered electricity) worked wonders to reduce air pollution in 'The Big Smoke'."

"Petrol driven cars & trucks removed horse manure from the big cities, and tractors reduced the amount of land required to grow food for those cities."

"Nuclear power is the ultimate “green energy” – enormous amounts of clean energy generated on a tiny footprint, by minute quantities of fuel, with little effect on air or water quality. Its only disadvantage is that, unlike coal and gas, it does not recycle the gases of life to the atmosphere."

Naturally there are risks in every human endeavour but modern energy sources kill far fewer people and wildlife than were once lost in timber getting, horse breaking, wind-jammers, sulky capsize, air pollution and city wildfires.

& to believe that man can tweak the climate with carbon taxes is nonsense.

In contrast, the so called “green energy” sources usually lauded on Earth Day have a heavy toll on the environment to produce piddling amounts of unreliable and costly energy.

Both wind & solar energy are so dilute that large areas of land must be sterilised by roads, transmission lines and construction sites to collect significant energy. Already many wind towers have been abandoned and others are being de-commissioned because of high maintenance costs or poor energy production.

Roof-top solar is a joke as a reliable supplier of energy for most of humanity. In most installations of wind and solar power, the facilities would not be built without subsidies and other political props, and it is doubtful that the green-power turbines and panels will generate enough useful energy over their limited life to recover the energy needed for their raw materials, manufacture, construction, roads, power lines, earth works, maintenance and decommission.

Green energy is not environmentally friendly
Where big wind/solar facilities are constructed, many native birds and bats are sliced by whirling swords, or singed and fried by concentrated solar heat rays. Blinded by their obsession with blaming fossil fuels for everything, greens pretend that this unnecessary slaughter of wildlife is not occurring.

Without carbon and nuclear fuels, Earth would be raped for fuel and food by destitute people trying to eke out a living without the greatest boon to modern living – cheap reliable energy. As Alex Epstein, from the Centre for Industrial Progress says eloquently, Fossil Fuels: The Greenest Energy.

“Despite what most environmentalists would have us believe, fossil fuels have made our lives more livable, not less. Thanks to coal, oil, & natural gas, the developed world has routine access to clean water, better sanitation, & yes, cleaner air. Watch the video here:
https://www.prageru.com/courses/environmental-science/fossil-fuels-greenest-ener...

And find out how, rather than destroying the planet, this miracle energy source is actually saving lives.
http://carbon-sense.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/PR-true-green-fuels.pdf

"Petrol driven cars & trucks removed horse manure from the big cities, and tractors reduced the amount of land required to grow food for those cities."

Now I wonder what could remove the useless Greenies from the big cities ?

There is a suspicion in anthropological circles that the Greenies evolved from a lower branch of the tree of human evolution than normal humans.