Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print
Federal Election - Betting Odds (Read 3279 times)
Redmond Neck
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 21852
ACT
Gender: male
Re: Federal Election - Betting Odds
Reply #15 - Apr 16th, 2016 at 8:50am
 
No significant change

Back to top
 

BAN ALL THESE ABO SITES RECOGNITIONS.

ALL AUSTRALIA IS FOR ALL AUSTRALIANS!
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 109787
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Federal Election - Betting Odds
Reply #16 - Apr 16th, 2016 at 8:54am
 
gee wizz - Labor is only at 3.75 to 1.

I thought the polls were running neck & neck?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Bam
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 21905
Gender: male
Re: Federal Election - Betting Odds
Reply #17 - Apr 16th, 2016 at 9:13am
 
Bobby. wrote on Apr 16th, 2016 at 8:54am:
gee wizz - Labor is only at 3.75 to 1.

I thought the polls were running neck & neck?

The opinion polls are, yes. Betting odds are different. They are not an accurate reflection of the actual chance of winning the election because the betting agency may already be holding a substantial amount of money for a Coalition election win. They will lower the Coalition's odds to discourage further bets on the Coalition (and increase Labor's odds correspondingly).
Back to top
 

You are not entitled to your opinion. You are only entitled to hold opinions that you can defend through sound, reasoned argument.
 
IP Logged
 
Redmond Neck
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 21852
ACT
Gender: male
Re: Federal Election - Betting Odds
Reply #18 - Apr 16th, 2016 at 9:19am
 
Bam wrote on Apr 16th, 2016 at 9:13am:
Bobby. wrote on Apr 16th, 2016 at 8:54am:
gee wizz - Labor is only at 3.75 to 1.

I thought the polls were running neck & neck?

The opinion polls are, yes. Betting odds are different. They are not an accurate reflection of the actual chance of winning the election because the betting agency may already be holding a substantial amount of money for a Coalition election win. They will lower the Coalition's odds to discourage further bets on the Coalition (and increase Labor's odds correspondingly).


You have summed it up pretty well, its a growing pot of money where the odds are moved to encourage the punters to bet. Is not a real guide to who people at large will vote for although polls will obviously influence the odds
Back to top
 

BAN ALL THESE ABO SITES RECOGNITIONS.

ALL AUSTRALIA IS FOR ALL AUSTRALIANS!
 
IP Logged
 
Sir lastnail
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 30185
Gender: male
Re: Federal Election - Betting Odds
Reply #19 - Apr 16th, 2016 at 9:28am
 
The way the libs are going in a few months time it will be close to a dollar for labor Cheesy LOL

What was longprong58 saying about 20 to 1 for labor Cheesy LOL
Back to top
 

In August 2021, Newcastle Coroner Karen Dilks recorded that Lisa Shaw had died “due to complications of an AstraZeneca COVID vaccination”.
 
IP Logged
 
Its time
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Boot libs out

Posts: 25639
Gender: female
Re: Federal Election - Betting Odds
Reply #20 - Apr 16th, 2016 at 10:03am
 
Was 5.40 less than a month ago  Smiley Oh how your signature will haunt you for eternity Armpit
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Honest Joe
Full Member
***
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 180
Gender: male
Re: Federal Election - Betting Odds
Reply #21 - Apr 17th, 2016 at 7:53am
 
Are there fixed odds?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
aquascoot
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 35763
Gender: male
Re: Federal Election - Betting Odds
Reply #22 - Apr 17th, 2016 at 8:23am
 
Labor cant win with Bill.

He's a bit like Kim Beezley.

The electorate pay very little attention and they will tend to go with the bloke who gives off the better vibe.

Beezley and Shorten both give off that "low status " vibe.  They both give off very low quality "masculine energy".  They seem unsure of themselves. They are a bit whiney.  They dont seem to have that cocky confident edginess that a hawke or a keating had.

This is death to a leader.  women wont vote for a beta male and Bill is quite beta.

I cant see they have an obvious replacement. The whole labor party seems a celebration of emotional insecurity and negative neurotic thinking.

Til the next hawke or keating comes along, labor are destined to remain in opposition.

Female voters want an alpha male.
They all get on their knees for the champ .

Sucking up to the electorate (as Bill does) just makes him look weak
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print