longweekend58 wrote on Mar 30
th, 2016 at 5:04pm:
it is the THIRD bleaching even since 98 which means... tada...
IT HAS RECOVERED THREE TIMES IN THE PAST 20 years.
coral bleaching is a feature of coral in the first place.
firstly the water HASNT risen byt more than a few centimetres. It HASNT warmed by more than a few hundreths of a degree.. perhaps. and PH levels havent changed at all.
nothing new to see here.
This is the third time.
1998 - first ever recorded bleaching: 50% and about 5 to 10% death
2002 - 60% bleaching, and about 5 to 10% death.
GBR had a lucky escape in 2010 - global bleaching event.
2016 - so far, 95% bleaching.
Backed up by the observation that the abundance of coral has remained stable in the northern sector of the Great Barrier Reef, whereas the central and southern sectors have declined by 50% over the past 27 years (before this breaching event. So, the real consequence of this event, we will know in the future but the numbers are not good).
Bleaching:
Many types of coral have a special symbiotic relationship with a tiny marine algae (zooxanthellae) that live inside corals' tissue and are very efficient food producers that provide up to 90 per cent of the energy corals require to grow and reproduce.
Coral bleaching occurs when the relationship between the coral host and zooxanthellae, which give coral much of their colour, breaks down. Without the zooxanthellae, the tissue of the coral animal appears transparent and the coral's bright white skeleton is revealed.
Corals begin to starve once they bleach. While some corals are able to feed themselves, most corals struggle to survive without their zooxanthellae.
If the stress persist, then the coral dies.
One poster talked about how China blow up the coral for fish. But with mass bleaching event like this, scale wise its MUCH MUCH worse than blowing up the coral. It depletes fish stocks, and basically negates all the good work that we have done in Australia in terms of fishing management, and with that severe economic repercussions.