Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 ... 6
Send Topic Print
Great Barrier Reef Northern section 95% bleached (Read 17261 times)
Svengali
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Please don't thank me

Posts: 3474
Gender: male
Great Barrier Reef Northern section 95% bleached
Mar 30th, 2016 at 1:00pm
 
Climate change effects are accumulating quickly. It looks like the Great Barrier Reef is done for.

The heat content of the ocean is rising rapidly. Next will be rising acidification from CO2.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-03-28/great-barrier-reef-coral-bleaching-95-per-...

Quote:
An aerial survey of the northern Great Barrier Reef has shown that 95 per cent of the reefs are now severely bleached — far worse than previously thought.

Key points:

95 per cent of the Great Barrier Reef's northern reefs rated as severely bleached
Only 4 out of 520 reefs surveyed were found to be unaffected by bleaching
Third global coral bleaching event since 1998

Professor Terry Hughes, a coral reef expert based at James Cook University in Townsville who led the survey team, said the situation is now critical.

"This will change the Great Barrier Reef forever," Professor Hughes told 7.30.

"We're seeing huge levels of bleaching in the northern thousand-kilometre stretch of the Great Barrier Reef."

Of the 520 reefs he surveyed, only four showed no evidence of bleaching.

From Cairns to the Torres Strait, the once colourful ribbons of reef are a ghostly white.

"It's too early to tell precisely how many of the bleached coral will die, but judging from the extreme level even the most robust corals are snow white, I'd expect to see about half of those corals die in the coming month or so," Professor Hughes said.

Do you know more about this story? Email 7.30syd@your.abc.net.au
What is coral bleaching?

Occurs when abnormal environmental conditions cause coral to expel tiny photosynthetic algae, called zooxanthellae
Loss of colourful algae causes coral to turn white and "bleach".
Bleached coral can recover if the temperature drops and zooxanthellae are able to recolonise them, otherwise it may die
-Source: ARC Centre of Excellence
Coral bleaching is caused by abnormally high sea temperatures that kill the tiny marine algae essential to coral health.

This is the third global coral bleaching since 1998, and scientists have found no evidence of these disasters before the late 20th century.

"We have coral cores that provide 400 years of annual growth," explains Dr Neal Cantin from the Australian Institute of Marine Science.

"We don't see the signatures of bleaching in reduced growth following a bleaching event until the recent 1998/2000 events."

"There's good and bad news — the bottom three quarters of the reef is in strong condition," he said at the time.

"[But] as we head north of Lizard Island it becomes increasingly prone to bleaching."

The northern part of the Great Barrier Reef is the most pristine part of the marine park — and that is one possible glimmer of hope.

"On the bright side, it's more likely that these pristine reefs in the northern section will be better able to bounce back afterwards," Professor Hughes said.

"Nonetheless we're looking at 10-year recovery period, so this is a very severe blow."

'We're seeing climate change play out across our reefs'

Professor Justin Marshall, a reef scientist from the University of Queensland, said the reason for these bleaching events was clear.

"What we're seeing now is unequivocally to do with climate change," he told 7.30.

"The world has agreed, this is climate change, we're seeing climate change play out across our reefs."

2016 northern Great Barrier Reef coral survey
PHOTO: Coral bleaching is caused by abnormally high sea temperatures that kill the tiny marine algae essential to coral health. (ARC Centre of Excellence Coral Reef Studies)
I'm really angry that the government isn't listening to us, to the evidence we've been providing to them since 1998.
Reef scientist Justin Marshall
Professor Hughes said he is frustrated about the whole climate change debate.

"The government has not been listening to us for the past 20 years," he said.

"It has been inevitable that this bleaching event would happen, and now it has.

"We need to join the global community in reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

"For me, personally, it was devastating to look out of the chopper window and see reef after reef destroyed by bleaching.

"But really the emotion is not so much sadness as anger.

"I'm really angry that the government isn't listening to us, to the evidence we've been providing to them since 1998."

Mr Hunt told 7.30 that he was confident in the advice from the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority — that the southern and central parts of the reef had so far escaped serious bleaching.

He said the Government had committed $2 billion over the next decade to protect the reef through initiatives such as improving water quality and removing the crown-of-thorns starfish.

A spokesperson for the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority said it would be following up the aerial surveys with in-water surveys over the next two weeks to determine the true extent of the coral bleaching.
Back to top
 

We first fought the heathens in the name of religion, then Communism, and now in the name of drugs and terrorism. Our excuses for global domination always change.
Serj Tankian
 
IP Logged
 
tickleandrose
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 4201
Gender: female
Re: Great Barrier Reef Northern section 95% bleached
Reply #1 - Mar 30th, 2016 at 1:09pm
 
Its really sad news.  I wonder what it would do to the billion dollar tourism industry which are based on the great barrier reef.   

I wonder what would Andrew Bolt say now.  He did a show on it once, and invited his own panel of specialist.  One of them, apparent a marine biologist claim that ocean warming is in fact GOOD for the great barrier reef.  What a fraud he is.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
innocentbystander.
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 4723
Gender: male
Re: Great Barrier Reef Northern section 95% bleached
Reply #2 - Mar 30th, 2016 at 2:22pm
 
tickleandrose wrote on Mar 30th, 2016 at 1:09pm:
  I wonder what it would do to the billion dollar tourism industry which are based on the great barrier reef.   






Telling people the reefs rooted for political reasons when in fact its perfectly fine is far worse for the tourist industry.  Wink
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Svengali
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Please don't thank me

Posts: 3474
Gender: male
Re: Great Barrier Reef Northern section 95% bleached
Reply #3 - Mar 30th, 2016 at 4:17pm
 
innocentbystander. wrote on Mar 30th, 2016 at 2:22pm:
tickleandrose wrote on Mar 30th, 2016 at 1:09pm:
  I wonder what it would do to the billion dollar tourism industry which are based on the great barrier reef.   



Telling people the reefs rooted for political reasons when in fact its perfectly fine is far worse for the tourist industry.  Wink


The truth will set you free.
Back to top
 

We first fought the heathens in the name of religion, then Communism, and now in the name of drugs and terrorism. Our excuses for global domination always change.
Serj Tankian
 
IP Logged
 
Mr Hammer
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 25212
Gender: male
Re: Great Barrier Reef Northern section 95% bleached
Reply #4 - Mar 30th, 2016 at 4:32pm
 
Svengali wrote on Mar 30th, 2016 at 4:17pm:
innocentbystander. wrote on Mar 30th, 2016 at 2:22pm:
tickleandrose wrote on Mar 30th, 2016 at 1:09pm:
  I wonder what it would do to the billion dollar tourism industry which are based on the great barrier reef.   



Telling people the reefs rooted for political reasons when in fact its perfectly fine is far worse for the tourist industry.  Wink


The truth will set you free.
You Asian guys blow coral reefs up to kill fish. Shame on you pin dick.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
longweekend58
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male
Re: Great Barrier Reef Northern section 95% bleached
Reply #5 - Mar 30th, 2016 at 5:04pm
 
it is the THIRD bleaching even since 98 which means... tada...

IT HAS RECOVERED THREE TIMES IN THE PAST 20 years.

coral bleaching is a feature of coral in the first place. 

firstly the water HASNT risen byt more than a few centimetres. It HASNT warmed by more than a few hundreths of a degree.. perhaps.  and PH levels havent changed at all.

nothing new to see here.
Back to top
 

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."
 
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20179
Gender: male
Re: Great Barrier Reef Northern section 95% bleached
Reply #6 - Mar 30th, 2016 at 5:26pm
 
Wow, look what El Nino, a natural event, has done to the water temperatures.

...
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
miketrees
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6492
Gender: male
Re: Great Barrier Reef Northern section 95% bleached
Reply #7 - Mar 30th, 2016 at 5:28pm
 
It just means you will see some coral when you look at a map of Tassie
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
GordyL
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 4365
Hate Town
Gender: male
Re: Great Barrier Reef Northern section 95% bleached
Reply #8 - Mar 30th, 2016 at 5:45pm
 
Mr Hammer wrote on Mar 30th, 2016 at 4:32pm:
Svengali wrote on Mar 30th, 2016 at 4:17pm:
innocentbystander. wrote on Mar 30th, 2016 at 2:22pm:
tickleandrose wrote on Mar 30th, 2016 at 1:09pm:
  I wonder what it would do to the billion dollar tourism industry which are based on the great barrier reef.   



Telling people the reefs rooted for political reasons when in fact its perfectly fine is far worse for the tourist industry.  Wink


The truth will set you free.
You Asian guys blow coral reefs up to kill fish. Shame on you pin dick.


He's confused, 95% of his bum buddies have a bleached anus.
Back to top
 

On the Ning Nang Nong
Where the Cows go Bong!
and the monkeys all say BOO!
WWW  
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20179
Gender: male
Re: Great Barrier Reef Northern section 95% bleached
Reply #9 - Mar 30th, 2016 at 5:55pm
 
miketrees wrote on Mar 30th, 2016 at 5:28pm:
It just means you will see some coral when you look at a map of Tassie


Just watch out for the "crabs" Wink
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Mr Hammer
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 25212
Gender: male
Re: Great Barrier Reef Northern section 95% bleached
Reply #10 - Mar 30th, 2016 at 7:37pm
 
GordyL wrote on Mar 30th, 2016 at 5:45pm:
Mr Hammer wrote on Mar 30th, 2016 at 4:32pm:
Svengali wrote on Mar 30th, 2016 at 4:17pm:
innocentbystander. wrote on Mar 30th, 2016 at 2:22pm:
tickleandrose wrote on Mar 30th, 2016 at 1:09pm:
  I wonder what it would do to the billion dollar tourism industry which are based on the great barrier reef.   



Telling people the reefs rooted for political reasons when in fact its perfectly fine is far worse for the tourist industry.  Wink


The truth will set you free.
You Asian guys blow coral reefs up to kill fish. Shame on you pin dick.


He's confused, 95% of his bum buddies have a bleached anus.
Grin Grin
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Svengali
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Please don't thank me

Posts: 3474
Gender: male
Re: Great Barrier Reef Northern section 95% bleached
Reply #11 - Mar 30th, 2016 at 9:18pm
 
longweekend58 wrote on Mar 30th, 2016 at 5:04pm:
it is the THIRD bleaching even since 98 which means... tada...

It HASNT warmed by more than a few hundreths of a degree.. perhaps.  and PH levels havent changed at all.


Longweekend58 lies again. Longweekend58 doesn't understand that people won't accept his fantasies as fact.

...

...
Back to top
 

We first fought the heathens in the name of religion, then Communism, and now in the name of drugs and terrorism. Our excuses for global domination always change.
Serj Tankian
 
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20179
Gender: male
Re: Great Barrier Reef Northern section 95% bleached
Reply #12 - Mar 30th, 2016 at 11:27pm
 
Wow ocean acidification again?

'The rate presented in Table 2 and Figure 3 represents a mean instantaneous rate of change in pH hr−1'

'In terms of general patterns amongst the comparative datasets, the open ocean sites (CCE1 and Kingman Reef) and the Antarctic sites (Cape Evans and Cindercones) displayed the least variation in pH over the 30-day deployment period. For example, pH range fluctuated between 0.024 to 0.096 at CCE1, Kingman Reef, Cape Evans, and Cindercones (Figure 2A, B and Table 2). In distinct contrast to the stability of the open ocean and Antarctic sites, sensors at the other five site classifications (upwelling, estuarine/near-shore, coral reef, kelp forest, and extreme) captured much greater variability (pH fluctuations ranging between 0.121 to 1.430) and may provide insight towards ecosystem-specific patterns.'

' At the Palmyra fore reef site, pH maxima occurred in the early evening (∼5:00 pm), and pH minima were recorded immediately pre-dawn (∼6:30 am). On a fringing reef site in Moorea, French Polynesia, a similar diel pattern was observed, with pH maxima occurring shortly after sunset (∼7:30 pm) and pH minima several hours after dawn (∼10:00 am).'

http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0028983

Greater changes per hour than the postulated overall changes. Ocean acidification  is not a problem. Readings are shown to depend on time of day, where min/max occur at different times.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Svengali
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Please don't thank me

Posts: 3474
Gender: male
Re: Great Barrier Reef Northern section 95% bleached
Reply #13 - Mar 31st, 2016 at 1:15am
 
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/rising-acidity-in-the-ocean/

Quote:
Climate change caused by rising levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) is now widely recognized. But the other side of the equation—the massive absorption of CO2 by the ocean—has received far less attention. The planet’s seas quickly absorb 25 to 30 percent of humankind’s CO2 emissions and about 85 percent in the long run, as water and air mix at the ocean’s surface. We have “disposed” of 530 billion tons of the gas in this way, and the rate worldwide is now one million tons per hour, faster than experienced on earth for tens of millions of years. We are acidifying the ocean and fundamentally changing its remarkably delicate geochemical balance. Scientists are only beginning to investigate the consequences, but comparable natural changes in our geologic history have caused several mass extinctions throughout the earth’s waters.
That careful balance has survived over time because of a near equilibrium among the acids emitted by volcanoes and the bases liberated by the weathering of rock. The pH of seawater has remained steady for millions of years. Before the industrial era began, the average pH at the ocean surface was about 8.2 (slightly basic; 7.0 is neutral). Today it is about 8.1.
Although the change may seem small, similar natural shifts have taken 5,000 to 10,000 years. We have done it in 50 to 80 years.
Ocean life survived the long, gradual change, but the current speed of acidification is very worrisome. Emissions could reduce surface pH by another 0.4 unit in this century alone and by as much as 0.7 unit beyond 2100. We are hurtling toward an ocean different than the earth has known for more than 25 million years.
About 89 percent of the carbon dioxide dissolved in seawater takes the form of bicarbonate ion, about 10 percent as carbonate ion, and 1 percent as dissolved gas. Modern marine life has evolved to live in this chemistry. A wide variety of organisms use carbonate ion to manufacture their skeletons: snails, urchins, clams, crabs and lobsters. And notably, it forms the calcified plates of microscopic phytoplankton that are so abundant and crucial to the entire marine food chain. Meanwhile carbon dioxide levels influence the physiology of water-breathing organisms of all kinds, which for most creatures has been optimized to operate in a narrow range of dissolved CO2 and ocean pH.
We are now carrying out an extraordinary chemical experiment on a global scale. Our fossil-fuel emissions raise the dissolved CO2 levels in the ocean, which reduces carbonate ion concentrations and lowers pH. The ocean’s sunlit surface layer (the top 100 yards or so) could easily lose 50 percent of its carbonate ion by the end of this century unless we reduce emissions dramatically. Marine animals will find it harder to build skeletons, construct reefs, or simply to grow and breathe. Compared with past geologic events, the speed and scale of this conversion is astonishing.
We therefore have a dilemma. The ocean’s absorption of CO2 helps to keep atmospheric change in check. For decades, climate scientists described the uptake as a blessing for society, and ocean chemists hoped that calcium carbonate sediments on the seafloor would dissolve in sufficient quantities to offset a drop in pH. But research has shown that the rate at which sediments dissolve cannot possibly keep pace with the far faster rate of acidification. Society can continue to depend on the ocean for help, but the cost is a rising threat to all marine life.
Although our understanding remains murky, the fossil record shows that ocean life has suffered massive extinctions during periods of rapidly rising carbon dioxide levels. Marine animals’ metabolic functions are typically tuned to narrow, internal pH ranges. In addition to reducing the calcification of skeletons, more acidic water will acidify body fluids, likely raising respiratory stress and depressing metabolism.
Some organisms may tolerate a certain amount of change, but thinner shells will make others more vulnerable to damage or predators. Some organisms might also tolerate acidification of internal fluids to a point, yet even so many will expend more energy to maintain their optimal acid-base balance or will struggle to supply their body with oxygen and to sustain cellular functions vital to life. The extra expense of coping with acidification may make them more prone to dying. These stresses will be particularly severe for deep-sea animals, which have adapted to an extremely stable environment. And even if animals survive, the stresses will sap energy they would otherwise use for growth and reproduction.
We would probably see the effects of ocean acidification first in animal groups that have finely tuned environmental ranges, particularly those already “living on the edge” such as coral reefs, which have already suffered widespread bleaching and death from warming ocean temperatures. Less appreciated are effects on massive communities of tiny animals that live in the ocean’s midlevels. These creatures migrate en masse to the surface layer at night to feed yet sink to deep water during the daytime to avoid predators. In so doing, they form a critical link between the warm, oxygenated surface layer and the cold, oxygen-depleted waters of the deep, as well as a critical link ...
Back to top
 

We first fought the heathens in the name of religion, then Communism, and now in the name of drugs and terrorism. Our excuses for global domination always change.
Serj Tankian
 
IP Logged
 
Sir lastnail
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 30900
Gender: male
Re: Great Barrier Reef Northern section 95% bleached
Reply #14 - Mar 31st, 2016 at 7:12am
 
tickleandrose wrote on Mar 30th, 2016 at 1:09pm:
Its really sad news.  I wonder what it would do to the billion dollar tourism industry which are based on the great barrier reef.   

I wonder what would Andrew Bolt say now.  He did a show on it once, and invited his own panel of specialist.  One of them, apparent a marine biologist claim that ocean warming is in fact GOOD for the great barrier reef.  What a fraud he is.


Andrew Bolt is the modern day Tokyo Rose spreading propaganda on behalf on the conservatives.
Back to top
 

"If you take out Saddam, I guarantee you that it will have enormous positive reverberations on the region..." - Benjamin Netanyahu in 1995
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 ... 6
Send Topic Print