Australian Politics Forum - Chicken little the sky is a falling

Its time Gold Member Offline Boot libs out Posts: 25639 Gender:	Chicken little the sky is a falling Mar 24^th, 2016 at 11:16am http://m.smh.com.au/federal-politics/federal-election-2016/election-2016-devasta... Goodness me , its rare a budget is torpedoed before its even released , boy o boy are the Libtards in panic mode
Back to top	IP Logged

John Smith Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 78311 Gender:	Re: Chicken little the sky is a falling Reply #1 - Mar 24^th, 2016 at 11:20am you're looking at the wrong poll the poll you should be looking at is what percentage of liberal donors support it ... that figure should be well into the 90 percentile range
Back to top	Our esteemed leader: I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus. IP Logged

Bam

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 21905
Gender: male

Re: Chicken little the sky is a falling
Reply #2 - Mar 24^th, 2016 at 8:56pm

John Smith wrote on Mar 24^th, 2016 at 11:20am:

you're looking at the wrong poll

the poll you should be looking at is what percentage of liberal donors support it ... that figure should be well into the 90 percentile range

Unlikely. If we assume 35% Liberal voters (excluding other Coalition parties) in a poll and 3% of all voters support the proposition, the maximum percentage of Liberal voters that could support the proposition is 100/35 × 3%, or about 8% to 9% total.

Back to top

You are not entitled to your opinion. You are only entitled to hold opinions that you can defend through sound, reasoned argument.

IP Logged

stunspore

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 5097
Gender: male

Re: Chicken little the sky is a falling
Reply #3 - Mar 25^th, 2016 at 1:07am

Bam wrote on Mar 24^th, 2016 at 8:56pm:

John Smith wrote on Mar 24^th, 2016 at 11:20am:

you're looking at the wrong poll

the poll you should be looking at is what percentage of liberal donors support it ... that figure should be well into the 90 percentile range

Unlikely. If we assume 35% Liberal voters (excluding other Coalition parties) in a poll and 3% of all voters support the proposition, the maximum percentage of Liberal voters that could support the proposition is 100/35 × 3%, or about 8% to 9% total.

The key word was lib donors - not lib voters. Lib party first serves themselves, then donors and their voters last. Any benefit to rest of us is incidental.

Back to top

IP Logged

BatteriesNotIncluded Gold Member Offline MediocrityNET: because people died for this! Posts: 26966	Re: Chicken little the sky is a falling Reply #4 - Mar 25^th, 2016 at 1:25pm With so many points turnbull can't talk about I think he wants to avoid getting too stroppy on camera!
Back to top	Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) IP Logged

Swagman

Gold Member

Offline

Beware of cheap imitations......

Posts: 15095
Illawarra NSW
Gender: male

Re: Chicken little the sky is a falling
Reply #5 - Mar 25^th, 2016 at 3:57pm

Bam wrote on Mar 24^th, 2016 at 8:56pm:

John Smith wrote on Mar 24^th, 2016 at 11:20am:

you're looking at the wrong poll

the poll you should be looking at is what percentage of liberal donors support it ... that figure should be well into the 90 percentile range

Unlikely. If we assume 35% Liberal voters (excluding other Coalition parties) in a poll and 3% of all voters support the proposition, the maximum percentage of Liberal voters that could support the proposition is 100/35 × 3%, or about 8% to 9% total.

...you mean those that actually have to pay net tax......the slaves of you Ohclocrats.... that would make sense that they would support reduced 'flayness of the nettaxpayer'.....

Back to top

IP Logged

Labor voter

Senior Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 302
Gender: male

Re: Chicken little the sky is a falling
Reply #6 - Mar 26^th, 2016 at 6:50am

Swagman wrote on Mar 25^th, 2016 at 3:57pm:

Bam wrote on Mar 24^th, 2016 at 8:56pm:

John Smith wrote on Mar 24^th, 2016 at 11:20am:

you're looking at the wrong poll

the poll you should be looking at is what percentage of liberal donors support it ... that figure should be well into the 90 percentile range

Unlikely. If we assume 35% Liberal voters (excluding other Coalition parties) in a poll and 3% of all voters support the proposition, the maximum percentage of Liberal voters that could support the proposition is 100/35 × 3%, or about 8% to 9% total.

...you mean those that actually have to pay net tax......the slaves of you Ohclocrats.... that would make sense that they would support reduced 'flayness of the nettaxpayer'.....

Wouldn't be good if no one paid any tax. Think what the country would be like no roads, no public transport, no public schools or hospital, the place would be lawless and a mess.

So shut up about paying taxes and just thank those tax payers that paid taxes before you come along and provided the infrastructure and services that you are using today. But you don't want to leave any infrastructure or services to future generation.

Back to top

Opinions are like arseholes everyone got one.

It doesn't mean that your opinion or my opinion is right

See my post in the welcome thread reply #575 and you will know what I am like

IP Logged

John Smith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 78311
Gender: male

Re: Chicken little the sky is a falling
Reply #7 - Mar 26^th, 2016 at 9:01am

Swagman wrote on Mar 25^th, 2016 at 3:57pm:

Bam wrote on Mar 24^th, 2016 at 8:56pm:

John Smith wrote on Mar 24^th, 2016 at 11:20am:

you're looking at the wrong poll

the poll you should be looking at is what percentage of liberal donors support it ... that figure should be well into the 90 percentile range

Unlikely. If we assume 35% Liberal voters (excluding other Coalition parties) in a poll and 3% of all voters support the proposition, the maximum percentage of Liberal voters that could support the proposition is 100/35 × 3%, or about 8% to 9% total.

...you mean those that actually have to pay net tax......the slaves of you Ohclocrats.... that would make sense that they would support reduced 'flayness of the nettaxpayer'.....

you're a one trick pony

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

BatteriesNotIncluded

Gold Member

Offline

MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966

Re: Chicken little the sky is a falling
Reply #8 - Mar 26^th, 2016 at 1:03pm

John Smith wrote on Mar 26^th, 2016 at 9:01am:

Swagman wrote on Mar 25^th, 2016 at 3:57pm:

Bam wrote on Mar 24^th, 2016 at 8:56pm:

John Smith wrote on Mar 24^th, 2016 at 11:20am:

you're looking at the wrong poll

the poll you should be looking at is what percentage of liberal donors support it ... that figure should be well into the 90 percentile range

Unlikely. If we assume 35% Liberal voters (excluding other Coalition parties) in a poll and 3% of all voters support the proposition, the maximum percentage of Liberal voters that could support the proposition is 100/35 × 3%, or about 8% to 9% total.

...you mean those that actually have to pay net tax......the slaves of you Ohclocrats.... that would make sense that they would support reduced 'flayness of the nettaxpayer'.....

you're a one trick pony

How many tricks does a planet accountant need?

Back to top

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is. It wouldn't be there without the tax payer. Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know.... (swaggy) *

IP Logged