8.

Darack (Derrick) Belan to the:
(a)

New South Wales Commissioner of Police, for further investigation of possible offences of larceny and/or fraud in relation to the use of credit cards contrary to ss 117, 156
and/or 192E of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) (Volume 2, Chapter 4);

(b)

Executive Director of New South Wales Industrial Relations for further investigation of possible offences in relation to breaches of his duties as an officer in relation to the use of credit cards contrary to ss 267 and 268 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996 (NSW) (Volume 2, Chapter 4);

(c)

General Manager of the Fair Work Commission in order that consideration may be given to whether to instituteproceedings against him for breaches of his duties as an officer in relation to the use of credit cards contrary to ss 285, 286 and/or 287 of the FW(RO) Act (Volume 2, Chapter 4);

(d)

General Manager of the Fair Work Commission in order that consideration may be given to whether to institute proceedings against him for breaches of his duties as an officer in relation to the arrangement with Paul Gibson contrary to ss 285, 286 and/or 287 of the FW(RO) Act (Volume 2, Chapter 4);

(e)

Executive Director of New South Wales Industrial Relations so that consideration may be given to whether to institute proceedings in respect of possible offences in relation to breaches of his duties as an officer in relation to the arrangement with Paul Gibson contrary to s 268 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996 (NSW) (Volume 2, Chapter 4).

(f)

General Manager of the Fair Work Commission in order that consideration may be given to whether to institute proceedings against him for breaches of his duties as an officer in relation to the negotiation of his severance terms contrary to ss 285, 286 and 287 of the FW(RO) Act (Volume 2, Chapter 4);

(g)

New South Wales Commissioner of Police, the Director of Public Prosecutions of New South Wales and the Executive Director of New South Wales Industrial Relation so that consideration may be given to whether to institute proceedings against him in respect of possible offences for breaches of his duties as an officer in relation to negotiation of his severance terms contrary to s 268 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996 (NSW) (Volume 2, Chapter 4); and

(h)

General Manager of the Fair Work Commission in order that consideration may be given to whether to institute proceedings against him for pecuniary penalty orders in relation to possible breaches of his duties as an officer in relation to the general governance of the union contrary to s 285 of the FW(RO) Act (Volume 2, Chapter 4).

9.

Marilyn Issanchon to the General Manager of the Fair Work Commission in order that consideration may be given to whether to institute proceedings against her for pecuniary penalty orders in relation to possible breaches of her duties as an officer contrary to s 285 of the FW(RO) Act (Volume 2, Chapter 4).

10.

Katherine Jackson to the:

(a)

Victorian Commissioner of Police and Director of Public Prosecutions of Victoria in order that consideration may be given to whether she should be charged with and prosecuted
for obtaining property and financial advantage by deception contrary to ss 81 and 82 of the Crimes Act 1958 (Cth) (Volume 2, Chapter 5.1).

(b)

Victorian Commissioner of Police for further investigation as to whether she may have given false or misleading evidence in contravention of 6H of the Royal Commission Act 1902(Cth) (Volume 2, Chapter 5.2).

(c)

General Manager of the Fair Work Commission so that consideration can be given to the General Manager commencing proceedings against Katherine Jackson for pecuniary penalty orders for her contraventions of s 287 (Volume 2, Chapter 5.2).

11.

Peter Mylan to the:
(a)

Executive Director of NSW Industrial Relations so that consideration may be given to whether to institute proceedings against him in relation to possible offences for breaches of his duties as an officer contrary to s 267 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996 (NSW) (Volume 2, Chapter 5.2, Appendix G); and

(b)

Director of Public Prosecutions of New South Wales and the New South Wales Commissioner of police in order that consideration may be given to whether he should be charged with and prosecuted for intentionally deceiving members by false or misleading statement contrary to s 192H of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) (Volume 2, Chapter 5.2, Appendix G).

(c)

General Manager of the Fair Work Commission so that consideration may be given to whether to institute proceedings against him for a breach of his duties as an officer contrary to ss 285, 286 and 287 of the FW(RO) Act (Volume 2, Chapter 5.2, Appendix G).

12.

Dean Hall to the Director-General, Chief Minister, Treasury and Economic Development Directorate in order that consideration may be given to whether he should be charged with and prosecuted for intimidating an inspector contrary to s 190 of the Work, Health and Safety Act 2011 (ACT) (Volume 3, Chapter 6.3).

26.

Steve Dixon to the New South Wales Commissioner of Police and the Director of Public Prosecutions of New South Wales in order that prosecuted in relation to a corrupt commission offence contrary to s 249B(1)(b) of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) (Volume 3, Chapter 7.4).

27.

Michael Deegan to the New South Wales Commissioner of Police and the Director of Public Prosecutions of New South Wales in order that consideration may be given to whether he should be charged with and prosecuted in relation to a corrupt commission offence contrary to s 249B(2)(b) of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) (Volume 3, Chapter 7.4).

28.

Andrew Ferguson to the:
(a)

New South Wales Commissioner of Police and the Director of Public Prosecutions of New South Wales in order that consideration may be given to whether he should be charged with and prosecuted for aiding, abetting, counselling or procuring Steve Dixon’s possible offence contrary to s 249F of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) (Volume 3, Chapter 7.4); and

(b)

General Manager of the Fair Work Commission so that consideration may be given to whether to institute proceedings against him in relation to his breaches of his duties as an officer contrary to s 286 of Sch 1B of the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth) (Volume 3, Chapter 7.5).

29.

Tony Papa to the New South Wales Commissioner of Police and the Director of Public Prosecutions of New South Wales in order that consideration may be given to whether he should be charged with and prosecuted for aiding, abetting, counselling or procuring Steve Dixon’s possible offence contrary to s 249F of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW)
(Volume 3, Chapter 7.4).
30.

Trevor Sharp to the New South Wales Commissioner of Police and the Director of Public Prosecutions of New South Wales in order that consideration may be given to whether he should be charged with and prosecuted for aiding, abetting, counselling or procuring Steve Dixon’s possible offence contrary to s 249F of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW)(Volume 3, Chapter 7.4).

31.

Peter McClelland to the General Manager of the Fair Work Commission so that consideration may be given to whether to institute proceedings against him in relation to his breaches of his duties as an officer contrary to s 286 of Sch 1B of the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth) (Volume 3, Chapter 7.5).

32.

David Hanna to the Director of Public Prosecutions of Queensland and the Queensland Commissioner of Police in order that consideration may be given to whether he should be charged with and prosecuted in relation to a corrupt commission offence contrary to s 442B of the Criminal Code 1899 (Qld) (Volume 4, Chapter 8.1).

33.

Mathew McAllum to the Director of Public Prosecutions of Queensland and the Queensland Commissioner of Police in order that consideration may be given to whether he should be charged with and prosecuted in relation to a corrupt commission offence contrary to s 442BA of the Criminal Code 1899 (Qld) (Volume 4, Chapter 8.1).

34.

Adam Moore to the Director of Public Prosecutions of Queensland and the Queensland Commissioner of Police in order that consideration may be given to whether he should be charged with and prosecuted in relation to a corrupt commission offence contrary to s 442BA of the Criminal Code 1899 (Qld) (Volume 4, Chapter 8.1).

36.

AWU to the:
(a)

Victorian Commissioner of Police and Director of Public Prosecutions of Victoria in order that consideration may be given to whether it should be charged with and prosecuted in relation to possible corrupt commission offences concerning Cleanevent Pty Ltd contrary to s 176(1)(a) and/or (b) of the Crimes Act 1958 (Vic) (Volume 4, Chapter 10.2);

(b)

General Manager of the Fair Work Commission so that consideration may be given to whether to institute proceedings against it for failing to maintain financial
statements giving a true and fair view of its financial position in relation to membership arrangements for employees of Cleanevent Pty Ltd contrary to s 253(3) of the FW(RO) Act (Volume 4, Chapter 10.2);

(c)
General Manager of the Fair Work Commission so that consideration may be given to whether to institute proceedings against it for failing to maintain an accurate register of members in relation to membership arrangements for employees of Cleanevent Pty Ltd contrary to s 230 of the FW(RO) Act (Volume 4, Chapter 10.2);

(d)

Victorian Commissioner of Police and Director of Public Prosecutions of Victoria in order that consideration may be given to whether it should be charged with and prosecuted in relation to possible corrupt commission offences concerning Thiess John Holland Pty Ltd, contrary to s 176 of the Crimes Act 1958 (Vic) (Volume 4, Chapter 10.3);

(e)

Victorian Commissioner of Police and Director of Public Prosecutions of Victoria in order that consideration may be given to whether it should be charged with and prosecuted in relation to possible false accounting offences concerning Thiess John Holland Pty Ltd, contrary to s 83 of the Crimes Act 1958 (Vic) (Volume 4, Chapter 10.3);

(f)

Victorian Commissioner of Police and Director of Public Prosecutions of Victoria in order that consideration may be given to whether it should be charged with and prosecuted in relation to possible corrupt commission offences concerning ACI Operations Pty Ltd contrary to s 176(1)(b) of the Crimes Act 1958 (Vic) (Volume 4, Chapter 10.5);

(g)

Victorian Commissioner of Police and Director of Public Prosecutions of Victoria in order that consideration may be given to whether it should be charged with and prosecuted in relation to possible corrupt commissions offences concerning
Chiquita Mushrooms Pty Ltd contrary to s 176(1)(b) of the Crimes Act 1958 (Vic) (Volume 4, Chapter 10.6);

(h)
Victorian Commissioner of Police and Director of Public Prosecutions of Victoria in order that consideration may be given to whether it should be charged with and prosecuted in relation to possible false accounting offences concerning Winslow Constructors Pty Ltd contrary to s 83 of the Crimes Act 1958 (Vic) (Volume 4, Chapter 10.8);

(i)

General Manager of the Fair Work Commission so that consideration may be given to whether to institute proceedings against it for failing to maintain an accurate register of members in relation to employees of Winslow Constructors Pty Ltd contrary to s 230 of the FW(RO) Act(Volume 4, Chapter 10.8);

(j)

General Manager of the Fair Work Commission so that consideration may be given to whether to institute proceedings against it for failing to maintain an accurate register of members concerning BMD Constructions Pty Ltd contrary to s 230 of the FW(RO) Act (Volume 4, Chapter 10.9);

(k)

General Manager of the Fair Work Commission so that consideration may be given to whether to institute proceedings against it for failing to maintain an accurate register of members concerning the Australian Jockeys’ Association contrary to s 230 of the FW(RO) Act (Volume 4, Chapter 10.9);

(l)

General Manager of the Fair Work Commission so that consideration may be given to whether to institute proceedings against it for failing to maintain an accurate register of members concerning Geotechnical Engineering Pty Ltd contrary to s 230 of the FW(RO) Act (Volume 4, Chapter 10.9);

(m)
General Manager of the Fair Work Commission so that consideration may be given to whether to institute proceedings against it for failing to maintain an accurate register of members concerning the Australian Netball Players Association contrary to s 230 of the FW(RO) Act (Volume 4, Chapter 10.9); and

(n)

Victorian Commissioner of Police and Director of Public Prosecutions of Victoria in order that consideration may be given to whether it should be charged with and prosecuted in relation to possible false accounting offences concerning


Downer EDI Engineering Power Pty Ltd, contrary to s 83 of the Crimes Act 1958 (Vic) (Volume 4, Chapter 10.10).

37.

Julian Rzesiowiecki to the:
(a)

Victorian Commissioner of Police and Director of Public Prosecutions of Victoria in order that consideration may be given to whether he should be charged with and prosecuted in relation to possible corrupt commission offences contrary to s
176 of the Crimes Act 1958 (Vic) (Volume 4, Chapter 10.3);
and

(b)

Victorian Commissioner of Police and Director of Public Prosecutions of Victoria in order that consideration may be given to whether he should be charged with and prosecuted in relation to possible false accounting offences, contrary to s 83 of the Crimes Act 1958 (Vic) (Volume 4, Chapter 10.3).

Back to front, I know... but I'm tired.....

Do some work for yourselves for a change.... stop feeding off me....

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Mar 23^rd, 2016 at 7:11am:

Fallacious.

Andrei.Hicks wrote on Mar 23^rd, 2016 at 7:11am:

They already have ... a Trade Union Royal Commission that found a few items of concern but nothing to support the proposition that they were "shockingly corrupt".

If you want "shockingly corrupt", take a look at the NSW branch of the Liberal party. There's more corruption there than in the whole of the Australian trade union movement. Campaign donations, links to the Mafia, a dozen Liberals resigning after investigation by ICAC, corruption in the preselection process, books in need of a forensic audit, the list goes on.

Bam wrote on Mar 24^th, 2016 at 3:43pm:



Remember Labor links to Mafia too.

Don't be shy. You can confess it here. You are among friends.

Bam wrote on Mar 24^th, 2016 at 3:43pm:


except that that was EXACTLY how the report referred to the union movement. you can choose to disagree, you do NOT get to restate the findings so as to give a different outcome.

liar