Marla wrote on Apr 2^nd, 2016 at 10:41am:


Oh NOO-OOOOOOOO(ZE!)

Who woke her up?!

Don't slam the door or flush the toilet next time!

cods wrote on Apr 2^nd, 2016 at 8:32am:


Poisoned maybe. 50% of the voters might prefer poison.

Herb, I was listening to Hancock last night quoting passages from his diary - which I could transcribe on request - and he referred to his mate Bill as one of the great literary Herberts.
And I was wondering are you related to that family? I'd not heard of them myself.

John_Taverner wrote on Apr 2^nd, 2016 at 1:07pm:


I can read French.

It says it will vaporise anyone you spray it on - (eg. Donald Trump).

Breitbart:

Radical leftists pushing for an open borders agenda are attempting to destroy the ability of over 80 percent of our nation’s Border Patrol agents to speak out and sound the alarm to the public and to Congress. The Huffington Post reported that the open-borders extremist group, Not1More, is a “prominent immigrants rights group” and that they were behind an effort to have the AFL-CIO kick out the National Border Patrol Council from its ranks. Not1More derives its name from the idea that “not one more” illegal alien should be deported from the U.S.

The attacks on Border Patrol agents ramped up after Breitbart first reported that the National Border Patrol Council (NBPC) had endorsed Donald Trump for President. The organization broke from a history of never endorsing during a presidential primary, perhaps largely due to Trump’s stance that the actual Border Patrol agents who guard our nation’s borders should sit at the head of the table for any discussion determining U.S. border security policy. The Trump campaign, through senior policy adviser Stephen Miller, publicly declared that they would secure the border by listening to the agents in the NBPC, thereby giving the agents the ultimate platform to hold Trump accountable if he did not follow through on his promise–and unprecedented move for a presidential candidate.

The NBPC, though a union, poses a unique challenge to traditional conservative ideologues because it is the only legal mechanism for Border Patrol agents to advocate and defends themselves. The group is widely conservative, has a lengthy history of endorsing Republicans, and while conservatives are largely in favor of border security and anti-union, they would have no ability to obtain the information needed to properly secure the border without the NBPC. Border security advocates would have to rely upon politically-appointed bureaucrats in the management of the agency to determine what the realities are along the border were it not for the NBPC providing a mechanism for actual agents who work the border to have a voice.

Well now, Dune was a lot more than a trilogy..at least 6 volumes (I think)  but I can understand why you found it heavy going.. it takes the ability to encompass a lot of information, to get a good idea of the scope of the work.

You lack the attention span, it would seem. Your praise fro Trump demonstrates a huge lack of knowledge... especially when it comes to visions for the future.

John_Taverner wrote on Apr 2^nd, 2016 at 9:39pm:


You're such a fount of knowledge, Mr Taverner.