Armchair_Politician wrote on Mar 14
th, 2016 at 9:59am:
It's not screwing anyone over.
Except employers.
No it isn’t.
Armchair_Politician wrote on Mar 14
th, 2016 at 9:59am:
Penalty rates have been around for a hundred years.
One hundred years ago, the cost of living wasn't as high as it is now.
Neither were the wages.
Armchair_Politician wrote on Mar 14
th, 2016 at 9:59am:
Nobody is asking for more money.
Really? Then there's no need for penalty rates.
Nobody is asking for more money because penalty rates are in place. Is that too hard for you to understand?
Penalty rates are IN ADDITION to an individual's wage, so yes, they are asking for more money than what their wage stipulates.
Armchair_Politician wrote on Mar 14
th, 2016 at 9:59am:
Moreover, penalty rates do not create unemployment.
Nor do they create jobs, because they increase expenses on business and therefore are a disincentive for business to employ more people.
Following on from that amazing piece of logic (and I’m using the word loosely) one would then expect that if you cut everyone’s wages by half, which is probably something that would appeal to the likes of you, you would then double employment.
That would certainly increase employment because employers would have more revenue to put toward new employees, but no one (including myself) is advocating that.
Armchair_Politician wrote on Mar 14
th, 2016 at 9:59am:
Crisis over.
Not by a long shot.
There is no crisis.
Tell that to the business owners struggling to pay their mortgage because penalty rates are impinging on their profits.