Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 ... 11
Send Topic Print
Government to change Senate voting laws (Read 10794 times)
Armchair_Politician
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 28479
Gender: male
Government to change Senate voting laws
Feb 22nd, 2016 at 10:54am
 
The Government is confident changes to Senate voting laws will get support, and stop crossbenchers with miniscule votes getting into Parliament.

The Prime Minister announced the news on the same day a new opinion poll showed the major parties were 50/50 with voters.

We are anticipating The Greens will back the government, giving the Coalition the numbers in the Senate to get this legislation through.

Greens Leader Richard Di Natale says it's about democracy and the current system allows "faceless men" and "factional operators" to wield hidden power.

But Senator Di Natale The Greens say they will be looking closely at the detail.

...

...

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-02-22/abc-politics-live-blog-february-22/7188348
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Armchair_Politician
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 28479
Gender: male
Re: Government to change Senate voting laws
Reply #1 - Feb 22nd, 2016 at 10:55am
 
It was absolutely ridiculous that arsewipes like Muir could get into the Senate on less than half a percent of the primary vote and hold the government hostage. Lets hope these changes are passed.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Bam
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 21905
Gender: male
Re: Government to change Senate voting laws
Reply #2 - Feb 22nd, 2016 at 11:05am
 
At first glance, most of the proposals look sensible. I have stated before that ticket voting is undemocratic.

One thing that I disagree with - why must voters voting below the line number 90% of the boxes for a valid vote while voters above the line only have to number one?
Back to top
 

You are not entitled to your opinion. You are only entitled to hold opinions that you can defend through sound, reasoned argument.
 
IP Logged
 
Kat
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Socialism IS the answer.

Posts: 17709
Everywhere and no-where
Gender: female
Re: Government to change Senate voting laws
Reply #3 - Feb 22nd, 2016 at 11:20am
 
What part of 'NO government should EVER be permitted to control both Houses' don't these right-wing fektards understand???
Back to top
 

...
 
IP Logged
 
President Elect, The Mechanic
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17501
Gender: male
Re: Government to change Senate voting laws
Reply #4 - Feb 22nd, 2016 at 11:31am
 
Kat wrote on Feb 22nd, 2016 at 11:20am:
What part of 'NO government should EVER be permitted to control both Houses' don't these right-wing fektards understand???


oh for crying out loud...

the political retard strikes again...  Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

Q

The STORM has arrived
Every Dog Has Its Day...
Dark to Light.
Sheep no more.
 
IP Logged
 
President Elect, The Mechanic
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17501
Gender: male
Re: Government to change Senate voting laws
Reply #5 - Feb 22nd, 2016 at 11:32am
 
Armchair_Politician wrote on Feb 22nd, 2016 at 10:55am:
It was absolutely ridiculous that arsewipes like Muir could get into the Senate on less than half a percent of the primary vote and hold the government hostage. Lets hope these changes are passed.


x 2
Back to top
 

Q

The STORM has arrived
Every Dog Has Its Day...
Dark to Light.
Sheep no more.
 
IP Logged
 
Armchair_Politician
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 28479
Gender: male
Re: Government to change Senate voting laws
Reply #6 - Feb 22nd, 2016 at 11:33am
 
Kat wrote on Feb 22nd, 2016 at 11:20am:
What part of 'NO government should EVER be permitted to control both Houses' don't these right-wing fektards understand???


So you're okay with dipsticks like Muir being able to hold the government of the day hostage on less than 0.5% of the primary vote when others secured significantly more votes than him?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Armchair_Politician
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 28479
Gender: male
Re: Government to change Senate voting laws
Reply #7 - Feb 22nd, 2016 at 11:33am
 
President Elect, The Mechanic wrote on Feb 22nd, 2016 at 11:31am:
Kat wrote on Feb 22nd, 2016 at 11:20am:
What part of 'NO government should EVER be permitted to control both Houses' don't these right-wing fektards understand???


oh for crying out loud...

the political retard strikes again...  Roll Eyes


Kat's reliable, gotta give her that!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Dnarever
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 61230
Here
Gender: male
Re: Government to change Senate voting laws
Reply #8 - Feb 22nd, 2016 at 11:36am
 
Armchair_Politician wrote on Feb 22nd, 2016 at 10:55am:
It was absolutely ridiculous that arsewipes like Muir could get into the Senate on less than half a percent of the primary vote and hold the government hostage. Lets hope these changes are passed.


It only means that some faceless party person will be elected on a half precent of the vote and be used to subvert the purpose of the senate.

I prefer what we have in preference to a blind rubber stamp with the same vote thanks.

At least what we currently have puts a person in place who can make a merit based decision.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Armchair_Politician
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 28479
Gender: male
Re: Government to change Senate voting laws
Reply #9 - Feb 22nd, 2016 at 11:38am
 
Dnarever wrote on Feb 22nd, 2016 at 11:36am:
Armchair_Politician wrote on Feb 22nd, 2016 at 10:55am:
It was absolutely ridiculous that arsewipes like Muir could get into the Senate on less than half a percent of the primary vote and hold the government hostage. Lets hope these changes are passed.


It only means that some faceless party person will be elected on a half precent of the vote and be used to subvert the purpose of the senate.

I prefer what we have in preference to a blind rubber stamp with the same vote thanks.

At least what we currently have puts a person in place who can make a merit based decision.


No, they won't be. These changes will mean that the exact opposite will occur. The candidate who is the one who garners more votes will be the one who is elected. No more of this farce of people elected on a miniscule number of votes. Oh, and you mention merit. Remember that halfwit Lambie and her threat to block all government legislation unless Abbott gave something specific to her (I can't recall what it was exactly)? That isn't merit - it's spite.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Dnarever
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 61230
Here
Gender: male
Re: Government to change Senate voting laws
Reply #10 - Feb 22nd, 2016 at 11:40am
 
Give independent's a position at the top and I would think that a lot of people would place them at number 2 ?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
mariacostel
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 7344
Sydney
Gender: female
Re: Government to change Senate voting laws
Reply #11 - Feb 22nd, 2016 at 11:44am
 
Kat wrote on Feb 22nd, 2016 at 11:20am:
What part of 'NO government should EVER be permitted to control both Houses' don't these right-wing fektards understand???


A very undemocratic position you hold there. You insist on denying the voters the right to elect a government that is allowed to govern.

We fully understand what you are saying. We just think you are an idiot.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
cods
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 88048
Re: Government to change Senate voting laws
Reply #12 - Feb 22nd, 2016 at 11:45am
 
President Elect, The Mechanic wrote on Feb 22nd, 2016 at 11:31am:
Kat wrote on Feb 22nd, 2016 at 11:20am:
What part of 'NO government should EVER be permitted to control both Houses' don't these right-wing fektards understand???


oh for crying out loud...

the political retard strikes again...  Roll Eyes



he would rather see someone with 1% get in than a lib... hes that manic......sad but true..

does it say anywhere where those who are elected simply because they belong to  a party..

should remain with the party or get out?....


thats what I dislike about the senate......

once in they can do as they like...and change sides......WRONG.

and we are stuck with them.

people have to have the right to know if they are voting for a party or a person.....

I would say a few of our senators have been elected thanks to the party they once belonged too...

apart from Muir of course.. how we got him I will never know????.......
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
mariacostel
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 7344
Sydney
Gender: female
Re: Government to change Senate voting laws
Reply #13 - Feb 22nd, 2016 at 11:45am
 
Dnarever wrote on Feb 22nd, 2016 at 11:36am:
Armchair_Politician wrote on Feb 22nd, 2016 at 10:55am:
It was absolutely ridiculous that arsewipes like Muir could get into the Senate on less than half a percent of the primary vote and hold the government hostage. Lets hope these changes are passed.


It only means that some faceless party person will be elected on a half precent of the vote and be used to subvert the purpose of the senate.

I prefer what we have in preference to a blind rubber stamp with the same vote thanks.

At least what we currently have puts a person in place who can make a merit based decision.


Well that is both silly and unsupportable. Plus, the entire purpose of representative democracy is allowing the voters t\o install senators, not loopholes in a system
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Armchair_Politician
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 28479
Gender: male
Re: Government to change Senate voting laws
Reply #14 - Feb 22nd, 2016 at 11:46am
 
mariacostel wrote on Feb 22nd, 2016 at 11:44am:
Kat wrote on Feb 22nd, 2016 at 11:20am:
What part of 'NO government should EVER be permitted to control both Houses' don't these right-wing fektards understand???


A very undemocratic position you hold there. You insist on denying the voters the right to elect a government that is allowed to govern.

We fully understand what you are saying. We just think you are an nice person.


Kat would rather have the joke that was the Gillard/Brown failed marriage. The kids (taxpayers) were the losers with the aborted child being the ill-fated carbon tax based on a lie.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 ... 11
Send Topic Print