Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 
Send Topic Print
Palaszczuk slammed for baby Asha comments (Read 3891 times)
skippy.
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 20882
Gender: male
Re: Palaszczuk slammed by fascists
Reply #15 - Feb 22nd, 2016 at 10:39am
 
Armchair_Politician wrote on Feb 22nd, 2016 at 9:15am:
PREMIER Annastacia Palaszczuk has been accused of inciting people smugglers and encouraging them to send refugees to Australia illegally.

Immigration Minister Peter Dutton yesterday slammed Ms Palaszczuk for sending a message to smugglers in Indonesia that Australia’s tough policy would soon be changed.

The comments came as authorities prepared to move asylum-seeker baby “Asha” from a Brisbane hospital to community detention.

“We are going to have a consistency of approach here because I can tell you that ­intelligence out of Indonesia recently was that people smugglers were reporting the comments of Premiers, including Palaszczuk … to say that there was going to be a change in the policy,” Mr Dutton said.

“People had prepaid deposits and all sorts of things to get on boats. We know there are about 14,000 people in Indonesia today who would get on boats tomorrow.”

Ms Palaszczuk wrote to Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull two weeks ago, saying she stood ready to accept asylum seekers into the state. Yesterday, she reiterated her stance.

“The fact it took a hospitalised baby girl, hundreds of people from across our community taking a principled stand in front of the hospital and expressions of disappointment from thousands more to finally move Immigration Minister Peter Dutton speaks volumes about his lack of character and compassion,” she said.

Mr Dutton yesterday said the Federal Government would not deviate in its policies, saying placing Asha and her family in community detention was not a long-term solution.

“ I’m not going to allow a situation where we have ­people harmed to come to our country to receive medical ­assistance and then they think there’s a formula for them to be released into the community. That is not going to happen,” Mr Dutton said.

In response to advocacy groups claiming victory after it was announced Asha would be moved by the end of Monday to community detention, Mr Dutton said community detention first was what “we’ve proposed all along”, before the family’s case is considered and a decision is made on whether they be returned to Nauru.

As reported by The Courier-Mail last Wednesday, doctors at Brisbane’s Lady Cilento Children’s Hospital agreed with immigration officers the 13-month-old could be moved into community detention, possibly at Pinkenba.

Medical staff had refused to discharge her if she was to be sent back to the island detention centre on Nauru.

Authorities had planned to move Asha yesterday but the decision was delayed, with Queensland Police stepping up their role in the operation.

Officers from the Public Safety Response Team and police negotiators descended on the hospital.

Mr Dutton did not rule out the family being sent back to Nauru or to their home country if they were found to not have a legitimate asylum claim.

The child has been at the hospital since January 26, after burning herself with boiling water at the detention centre in Nauru.

Mr Dutton said a bed shortage also played into doctors’ decision to agree to community detention.

“I understand there are some pressures at the hospital in terms of bed space and the rest of it but that is an issue for the Queensland Government.”

Darwin Asylum Seeker and Support Advocacy Network co-ordinator Natasha Blucher had been in contact with Asha’s parents and said they were pleased with the decision to be moved to community detention.

Asha’s father was relocated to the Pinkenba site when his family was taken to the hospital.

http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/national/premier-annastacia-palaszczuk-sla...

There I fixed the heading.
Back to top
 

  freedivers other forum- POLITICAL ANIMAL
Click onWWW below 
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Armchair_Politician
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 28508
Gender: male
Re: Palaszczuk slammed for baby Asha comments
Reply #16 - Feb 22nd, 2016 at 10:40am
 
Dsmithy70 wrote on Feb 22nd, 2016 at 9:57am:
Armchair_Politician wrote on Feb 22nd, 2016 at 9:15am:
“People had prepaid deposits and all sorts of things to get on boats. We know there are about 14,000 people in Indonesia today who would get on boats tomorrow.”



Really???

People smuggling is a crime in both Indo & Aust.

If you "KNOW" 14K of people have paid deposits, one would assume you would know to who those deposits went & therefore could arrest & break up this apparently lucrative speculation on Australian Immigration Laws.

My bet seeing as the interview ended with dickhead dutton rabbiting on about "Union Bosses" running the country is he wouldn't actually have a clue or any evidence of the deposits & is lying his arse off.



"We know there are about 14,000 people in Indonesia today who would get on boats tomorrow."

He never said 14,000 people had pre-paid people smugglers with the intention of getting on a boat to come here. He said that there are about 14,000 people in Indonesia today who would get on boats tomorrow. That's entirely different. Who da dickhead? YOU DA DICKHEAD!!!  Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Armchair_Politician
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 28508
Gender: male
Re: Palaszczuk slammed for baby Asha comments
Reply #17 - Feb 22nd, 2016 at 10:41am
 
polite_gandalf wrote on Feb 22nd, 2016 at 10:07am:
faark me this government is completely unhinged.

How dare a premier express concern over the welfare of a baby under our care.


Her expression of concern for the baby isn't what she did wrong, but then I wouldn't expect you to get that.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Melanias purse
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 101038
Re: Palaszczuk slammed for baby Asha comments
Reply #18 - Feb 22nd, 2016 at 10:42am
 
double plus good wrote on Feb 22nd, 2016 at 9:53am:
Annastacia Palaszczuk . What a bleeding heart spastic.


You can add the premier of NSW and Tasmania, dear. They all want refugees - Tasmania in particular. Out in regional areas, they're suffering from a lack of workers.

Why do you think the Libs are revising their backpacker tax idea? The premiers and regional leaders want more people.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Armchair_Politician
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 28508
Gender: male
Re: Palaszczuk slammed for baby Asha comments
Reply #19 - Feb 22nd, 2016 at 10:42am
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 22nd, 2016 at 10:18am:
double plus good wrote on Feb 22nd, 2016 at 10:17am:
greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 22nd, 2016 at 10:14am:
double plus good wrote on Feb 22nd, 2016 at 10:11am:
polite_gandalf wrote on Feb 22nd, 2016 at 10:07am:
faark me this government is completely unhinged.

How dare a premier express concern over the welfare of a baby under our care.
The nice people don't care about the children who are going to drown if they get people smuggling up and going again.


People smuggling hasn't stopped.

The boats haven't stopped.

People are still drowning.

Not under Australian jurisdiction. If the rest of the world can't control their borders that's their problem.


Thus, it's YOU who doesn't care about children drowning.

Thanks for making that crystal clear.



What have YOU done about the people drowning in the Med? What have YOU done, eh?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Aussie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 39696
Gender: male
Re: Palaszczuk slammed for baby Asha comments
Reply #20 - Feb 22nd, 2016 at 10:43am
 
Armchair_Politician wrote on Feb 22nd, 2016 at 10:41am:
polite_gandalf wrote on Feb 22nd, 2016 at 10:07am:
faark me this government is completely unhinged.

How dare a premier express concern over the welfare of a baby under our care.




Her expression of concern for the baby isn't what she did wrong, but then I wouldn't expect you to get that.


What did she do wrong then if it was not expressing concerning over the welfare of a child and reminding Dutton that Qld. will  take some of these people off his hands.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Armchair_Politician
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 28508
Gender: male
Re: Palaszczuk slammed for baby Asha comments
Reply #21 - Feb 22nd, 2016 at 10:44am
 
Vic wrote on Feb 22nd, 2016 at 10:37am:
Dutton has less intellect than a cabbage.  And he is seen as one of the better Coalition MPs


So that just proves that both cabbage and Dutton are smarter than you and the entire band of left-wing retards on this forum.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Armchair_Politician
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 28508
Gender: male
Re: Palaszczuk slammed for baby Asha comments
Reply #22 - Feb 22nd, 2016 at 10:45am
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 22nd, 2016 at 10:36am:
double plus good wrote on Feb 22nd, 2016 at 10:33am:
greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 22nd, 2016 at 10:18am:
double plus good wrote on Feb 22nd, 2016 at 10:17am:
greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 22nd, 2016 at 10:14am:
double plus good wrote on Feb 22nd, 2016 at 10:11am:
polite_gandalf wrote on Feb 22nd, 2016 at 10:07am:
faark me this government is completely unhinged.

How dare a premier express concern over the welfare of a baby under our care.
The nice people don't care about the children who are going to drown if they get people smuggling up and going again.


People smuggling hasn't stopped.

The boats haven't stopped.

People are still drowning.

Not under Australian jurisdiction. If the rest of the world can't control their borders that's their problem.


Thus, it's YOU who doesn't care about children drowning.

Thanks for making that crystal clear.

You're wrong. I don't like  the idea of children drowning. It's people smuggling supporters like you who obviously want it to occur. Kids wouldn't drown if the world had my opinion on the matter.


You have no problem with children drowning in the rest of the world.

You have made this crystal clear.

"If the rest of the world can't control their borders that's their problem."



You sure get confused easily. Let me dumb it down for you even more. He said he's glad people are no longer drowning off our coast. He didn't say that he's glad they're drowning elsewhere. It's not up to our government to dictate how governments along the Med run their immigration policies. Nor is it our fault if a boat sinks in the Med.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
double plus good
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 5693
Gender: male
Re: Palaszczuk slammed for baby Asha comments
Reply #23 - Feb 22nd, 2016 at 10:47am
 
Armchair_Politician wrote on Feb 22nd, 2016 at 10:45am:
greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 22nd, 2016 at 10:36am:
double plus good wrote on Feb 22nd, 2016 at 10:33am:
greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 22nd, 2016 at 10:18am:
double plus good wrote on Feb 22nd, 2016 at 10:17am:
greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 22nd, 2016 at 10:14am:
double plus good wrote on Feb 22nd, 2016 at 10:11am:
polite_gandalf wrote on Feb 22nd, 2016 at 10:07am:
faark me this government is completely unhinged.

How dare a premier express concern over the welfare of a baby under our care.
The nice people don't care about the children who are going to drown if they get people smuggling up and going again.


People smuggling hasn't stopped.

The boats haven't stopped.

People are still drowning.

Not under Australian jurisdiction. If the rest of the world can't control their borders that's their problem.


Thus, it's YOU who doesn't care about children drowning.

Thanks for making that crystal clear.

You're wrong. I don't like  the idea of children drowning. It's people smuggling supporters like you who obviously want it to occur. Kids wouldn't drown if the world had my opinion on the matter.


You have no problem with children drowning in the rest of the world.

You have made this crystal clear.

"If the rest of the world can't control their borders that's their problem."



You sure get confused easily. Let me dumb it down for you even more. He said he's glad people are no longer drowning off our coast. He didn't say that he's glad they're drowning elsewhere. It's not up to our government to dictate how governments along the Med run their immigration policies. Nor is it our fault if a boat sinks in the Med.
Thanks armchair. Smiley Pecca can't read.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Armchair_Politician
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 28508
Gender: male
Re: Palaszczuk slammed for baby Asha comments
Reply #24 - Feb 22nd, 2016 at 10:48am
 
Aussie wrote on Feb 22nd, 2016 at 10:43am:
Armchair_Politician wrote on Feb 22nd, 2016 at 10:41am:
polite_gandalf wrote on Feb 22nd, 2016 at 10:07am:
faark me this government is completely unhinged.

How dare a premier express concern over the welfare of a baby under our care.




Her expression of concern for the baby isn't what she did wrong, but then I wouldn't expect you to get that.


What did she do wrong then if it was not expressing concerning over the welfare of a child and reminding Dutton that Qld. will  take some of these people off his hands.


She said that if you hurt your kids, they'll get sent here and then refugee advocates will apply as much pressure as they can to get the kid and family to be able to stay here. But all you heard was "bad Dutton, bad Dutton".
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Armchair_Politician
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 28508
Gender: male
Re: Palaszczuk slammed for baby Asha comments
Reply #25 - Feb 22nd, 2016 at 10:49am
 
double plus good wrote on Feb 22nd, 2016 at 10:47am:
Armchair_Politician wrote on Feb 22nd, 2016 at 10:45am:
greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 22nd, 2016 at 10:36am:
double plus good wrote on Feb 22nd, 2016 at 10:33am:
greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 22nd, 2016 at 10:18am:
double plus good wrote on Feb 22nd, 2016 at 10:17am:
greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 22nd, 2016 at 10:14am:
double plus good wrote on Feb 22nd, 2016 at 10:11am:
polite_gandalf wrote on Feb 22nd, 2016 at 10:07am:
faark me this government is completely unhinged.

How dare a premier express concern over the welfare of a baby under our care.
The nice people don't care about the children who are going to drown if they get people smuggling up and going again.


People smuggling hasn't stopped.

The boats haven't stopped.

People are still drowning.

Not under Australian jurisdiction. If the rest of the world can't control their borders that's their problem.


Thus, it's YOU who doesn't care about children drowning.

Thanks for making that crystal clear.

You're wrong. I don't like  the idea of children drowning. It's people smuggling supporters like you who obviously want it to occur. Kids wouldn't drown if the world had my opinion on the matter.


You have no problem with children drowning in the rest of the world.

You have made this crystal clear.

"If the rest of the world can't control their borders that's their problem."



You sure get confused easily. Let me dumb it down for you even more. He said he's glad people are no longer drowning off our coast. He didn't say that he's glad they're drowning elsewhere. It's not up to our government to dictate how governments along the Med run their immigration policies. Nor is it our fault if a boat sinks in the Med.
Thanks armchair. Smiley Pecca can't read.


One of the many failings of the dumbshit known as Peccahead. Smiley
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Aussie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 39696
Gender: male
Re: Palaszczuk slammed for baby Asha comments
Reply #26 - Feb 22nd, 2016 at 10:56am
 
Armchair_Politician wrote on Feb 22nd, 2016 at 10:48am:
Aussie wrote on Feb 22nd, 2016 at 10:43am:
Armchair_Politician wrote on Feb 22nd, 2016 at 10:41am:
polite_gandalf wrote on Feb 22nd, 2016 at 10:07am:
faark me this government is completely unhinged.

How dare a premier express concern over the welfare of a baby under our care.




Her expression of concern for the baby isn't what she did wrong, but then I wouldn't expect you to get that.


What did she do wrong then if it was not expressing concerning over the welfare of a child and reminding Dutton that Qld. will  take some of these people off his hands.


She said that if you hurt your kids, they'll get sent here and then refugee advocates will apply as much pressure as they can to get the kid and family to be able to stay here. But all you heard was "bad Dutton, bad Dutton".


Really?  What were her exact words?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 150480
Gender: male
Re: Palaszczuk slammed for baby Asha comments
Reply #27 - Feb 22nd, 2016 at 10:58am
 
Armchair_Politician wrote on Feb 22nd, 2016 at 10:45am:
greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 22nd, 2016 at 10:36am:
double plus good wrote on Feb 22nd, 2016 at 10:33am:
greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 22nd, 2016 at 10:18am:
double plus good wrote on Feb 22nd, 2016 at 10:17am:
greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 22nd, 2016 at 10:14am:
double plus good wrote on Feb 22nd, 2016 at 10:11am:
polite_gandalf wrote on Feb 22nd, 2016 at 10:07am:
faark me this government is completely unhinged.

How dare a premier express concern over the welfare of a baby under our care.
The nice people don't care about the children who are going to drown if they get people smuggling up and going again.


People smuggling hasn't stopped.

The boats haven't stopped.

People are still drowning.

Not under Australian jurisdiction. If the rest of the world can't control their borders that's their problem.


Thus, it's YOU who doesn't care about children drowning.

Thanks for making that crystal clear.

You're wrong. I don't like  the idea of children drowning. It's people smuggling supporters like you who obviously want it to occur. Kids wouldn't drown if the world had my opinion on the matter.


You have no problem with children drowning in the rest of the world.

You have made this crystal clear.

"If the rest of the world can't control their borders that's their problem."



You sure get confused easily. Let me dumb it down for you even more. He said he's glad people are no longer drowning off our coast. He didn't say that he's glad they're drowning elsewhere. It's not up to our government to dictate how governments along the Med run their immigration policies. Nor is it our fault if a boat sinks in the Med.


You both have no problem with children drowning (or being blown up) in the rest of the world.

You have made this crystal clear.

"If the rest of the world can't control their borders that's their problem."

Too late for backpedaling.


Back to top
 

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles
 
IP Logged
 
double plus good
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 5693
Gender: male
Re: Palaszczuk slammed for baby Asha comments
Reply #28 - Feb 22nd, 2016 at 11:00am
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 22nd, 2016 at 10:58am:
Armchair_Politician wrote on Feb 22nd, 2016 at 10:45am:
greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 22nd, 2016 at 10:36am:
double plus good wrote on Feb 22nd, 2016 at 10:33am:
greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 22nd, 2016 at 10:18am:
double plus good wrote on Feb 22nd, 2016 at 10:17am:
greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 22nd, 2016 at 10:14am:
double plus good wrote on Feb 22nd, 2016 at 10:11am:
polite_gandalf wrote on Feb 22nd, 2016 at 10:07am:
faark me this government is completely unhinged.

How dare a premier express concern over the welfare of a baby under our care.
The nice people don't care about the children who are going to drown if they get people smuggling up and going again.


People smuggling hasn't stopped.

The boats haven't stopped.

People are still drowning.

Not under Australian jurisdiction. If the rest of the world can't control their borders that's their problem.


Thus, it's YOU who doesn't care about children drowning.

Thanks for making that crystal clear.

You're wrong. I don't like  the idea of children drowning. It's people smuggling supporters like you who obviously want it to occur. Kids wouldn't drown if the world had my opinion on the matter.


You have no problem with children drowning in the rest of the world.

You have made this crystal clear.

"If the rest of the world can't control their borders that's their problem."



You sure get confused easily. Let me dumb it down for you even more. He said he's glad people are no longer drowning off our coast. He didn't say that he's glad they're drowning elsewhere. It's not up to our government to dictate how governments along the Med run their immigration policies. Nor is it our fault if a boat sinks in the Med.


You both have no problem with children drowning (or being blown up) in the rest of the world.

You have made this crystal clear.

"If the rest of the world can't control their borders that's their problem."

Too late for backpedaling.


What's that comment got to do with kids drowning. That comment means they are making their own problems. It's beyond Australia's power to fix it.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Armchair_Politician
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 28508
Gender: male
Re: Palaszczuk slammed for baby Asha comments
Reply #29 - Feb 22nd, 2016 at 11:03am
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 22nd, 2016 at 10:58am:
Armchair_Politician wrote on Feb 22nd, 2016 at 10:45am:
greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 22nd, 2016 at 10:36am:
double plus good wrote on Feb 22nd, 2016 at 10:33am:
greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 22nd, 2016 at 10:18am:
double plus good wrote on Feb 22nd, 2016 at 10:17am:
greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 22nd, 2016 at 10:14am:
double plus good wrote on Feb 22nd, 2016 at 10:11am:
polite_gandalf wrote on Feb 22nd, 2016 at 10:07am:
faark me this government is completely unhinged.

How dare a premier express concern over the welfare of a baby under our care.
The nice people don't care about the children who are going to drown if they get people smuggling up and going again.


People smuggling hasn't stopped.

The boats haven't stopped.

People are still drowning.

Not under Australian jurisdiction. If the rest of the world can't control their borders that's their problem.


Thus, it's YOU who doesn't care about children drowning.

Thanks for making that crystal clear.

You're wrong. I don't like  the idea of children drowning. It's people smuggling supporters like you who obviously want it to occur. Kids wouldn't drown if the world had my opinion on the matter.


You have no problem with children drowning in the rest of the world.

You have made this crystal clear.

"If the rest of the world can't control their borders that's their problem."



You sure get confused easily. Let me dumb it down for you even more. He said he's glad people are no longer drowning off our coast. He didn't say that he's glad they're drowning elsewhere. It's not up to our government to dictate how governments along the Med run their immigration policies. Nor is it our fault if a boat sinks in the Med.


You both have no problem with children drowning (or being blown up) in the rest of the world.

You have made this crystal clear.

"If the rest of the world can't control their borders that's their problem."

Too late for backpedaling.




You've been proven wrong time and time again. Too late for backpedaling.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 
Send Topic Print