Australian Politics Forum - House values are more important than owning one

Sir lastnail Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 30900 Gender:	House values are more important than owning one Feb 21^st, 2016 at 10:18am Seems that the libbos are pre-occupied in maintaining the ripoff value of real estate in this country. This is inline with their thinking of how the needs of the greedy are more important than the needs of the needy !! And if you are really really really lucky you might benefit from the trickle down effect LOL
Back to top	"If you take out Saddam, I guarantee you that it will have enormous positive reverberations on the region..." - Benjamin Netanyahu in 1995 IP Logged

Its time Gold Member Offline Boot libs out Posts: 25639 Gender:	Re: House values are more important than owning one Reply #1 - Feb 21^st, 2016 at 10:27am We all like to see a return on our investment
Back to top	IP Logged

Bobby.

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 117852
Melbourne
Gender: male

Re: House values are more important than owning one
Reply #2 - Feb 21^st, 2016 at 10:32am

Sir lastnail wrote on Feb 21^st, 2016 at 10:18am:

Seems that the libbos are pre-occupied in maintaining the ripoff value of real estate in this country. This is inline with their thinking of how the needs of the greedy are more important than the needs of the needy !!

And if you are really really really lucky you might benefit from the trickle down effect Cheesy

LOL

Very true sir Nail,

Turnbull said on TV on Friday night that
if people vote for Labor their house prices will be reduced.

Turnbull appeals to peoples greed rather than the need to house everyone
& the possibility of the Australian dream
where more people can own their own home
instead of house collectors getting a free tax ride
to exploit other people.

Libbos appeal to greed.

Back to top

IP Logged

Sir lastnail

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 30900
Gender: male

Re: House values are more important than owning one
Reply #3 - Feb 21^st, 2016 at 10:35am

Bobby. wrote on Feb 21^st, 2016 at 10:32am:

Sir lastnail wrote on Feb 21^st, 2016 at 10:18am:

Seems that the libbos are pre-occupied in maintaining the ripoff value of real estate in this country. This is inline with their thinking of how the needs of the greedy are more important than the needs of the needy !!

And if you are really really really lucky you might benefit from the trickle down effect Cheesy

LOL

Very true sir Nail,

Turnbull said on TV on Friday night that
if people vote for Labor their house prices will be reduced.

Turnbull appeals to peoples greed rather than the need to house everyone
& the possibility of the Australian dream
where more people can own their own home
instead of house collectors getting a free tax ride
to exploit other people.

Libbos appeal to greed.

and just heard Barnaby Rubble spruiking the same line Sad

Shows you how the libbos think. They like to create consumers for their rich mates businesses.

Back to top

"If you take out Saddam, I guarantee you that it will have enormous positive reverberations on the region..." - Benjamin Netanyahu in 1995

IP Logged

Sir lastnail Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 30900 Gender:	Re: House values are more important than owning one Reply #4 - Feb 21^st, 2016 at 10:37am Its time wrote on Feb 21^st, 2016 at 10:27am: We all like to see a return on our investment then don't rely on other tax payers to subsidize your investments.
Back to top	"If you take out Saddam, I guarantee you that it will have enormous positive reverberations on the region..." - Benjamin Netanyahu in 1995 IP Logged

Its time

Gold Member

Offline

Boot libs out

Posts: 25639
Gender: female

Re: House values are more important than owning one
Reply #5 - Feb 21^st, 2016 at 11:26am

Sir lastnail wrote on Feb 21^st, 2016 at 10:37am:

Its time wrote on Feb 21^st, 2016 at 10:27am:

We all like to see a return on our investment

then don't rely on other tax payers to subsidize your investments.

I agree, the concessions are over the top and Labor are on the right track reeling it in. Now let's see if they're prepared to go all the way with it or will they fold to another "oh the poor mining industry actually have to pay some tax telly campaign"

Back to top

IP Logged

The_Barnacle Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 6205 Melbourne Gender:	Re: House values are more important than owning one Reply #6 - Feb 21^st, 2016 at 11:57am To the owner occupier, the value of the house means very little. We all have to live somewhere so if we sell our house we also have to buy one. High house prices only really benefit those who have investment properties (the rich) and are detrimental to first home buyers and renters (the poor).
Back to top	The Right Wing only believe in free speech when they agree with what is being said. IP Logged

stunspore

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 5097
Gender: male

Re: House values are more important than owning one
Reply #7 - Feb 21^st, 2016 at 12:04pm

The_Barnacle wrote on Feb 21^st, 2016 at 11:57am:

To the owner occupier, the value of the house means very little. We all have to live somewhere so if we sell our house we also have to buy one.

High house prices only really benefit those who have investment properties (the rich) and are detrimental to first home buyers and renters (the poor).

Yep, true.

Back to top

IP Logged

Bobby.

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 117852
Melbourne
Gender: male

Re: House values are more important than owning one
Reply #8 - Feb 21^st, 2016 at 12:20pm

stunspore wrote on Feb 21^st, 2016 at 12:04pm:

The_Barnacle wrote on Feb 21^st, 2016 at 11:57am:

To the owner occupier, the value of the house means very little. We all have to live somewhere so if we sell our house we also have to buy one.

High house prices only really benefit those who have investment properties (the rich) and are detrimental to first home buyers and renters (the poor).

Yep, true.

Very true - the Libbos only care about the rich.

Back to top

IP Logged

BigOl64

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 14438
Townsville QLD
Gender: male

Re: House values are more important than owning one
Reply #9 - Feb 21^st, 2016 at 12:40pm

The_Barnacle wrote on Feb 21^st, 2016 at 11:57am:

To the owner occupier, the value of the house means very little. We all have to live somewhere so if we sell our house we also have to buy one.

High house prices only really benefit those who have investment properties (the rich) and are detrimental to first home buyers and renters (the poor).

Well that is total bullsh1t.

Homeowners care very much what their home are worth, If the @sre falls out of the market as nails has been praying for all these decades, then how do you think the millions of homeowners are going to feel?

Even that genius booby, would care that his house was worth considerably less that what he paid for it or what he owes; no one who actually owns a home would agree with you, because it is blatantly wrong.

Back to top

IP Logged

Sir lastnail

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 30900
Gender: male

Re: House values are more important than owning one
Reply #10 - Feb 21^st, 2016 at 12:51pm

BigOl64 wrote on Feb 21^st, 2016 at 12:40pm:

The_Barnacle wrote on Feb 21^st, 2016 at 11:57am:

To the owner occupier, the value of the house means very little. We all have to live somewhere so if we sell our house we also have to buy one.

High house prices only really benefit those who have investment properties (the rich) and are detrimental to first home buyers and renters (the poor).

Well that is total bullsh1t.

Homeowners care very much what their home are worth, If the @sre falls out of the market as nails has been praying for all these decades, then how do you think the millions of homeowners are going to feel?

Even that genius booby, would care that his house was worth considerably less that what he paid for it or what he owes; no one who actually owns a home would agree with you, because it is blatantly wrong.

It's no different than the share market but I don't see a first share buyers grant to help out first share buyers or to stop the share market from collapsing.

Back to top

"If you take out Saddam, I guarantee you that it will have enormous positive reverberations on the region..." - Benjamin Netanyahu in 1995

IP Logged

BigOl64

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 14438
Townsville QLD
Gender: male

Re: House values are more important than owning one
Reply #11 - Feb 21^st, 2016 at 1:01pm

Sir lastnail wrote on Feb 21^st, 2016 at 12:51pm:

BigOl64 wrote on Feb 21^st, 2016 at 12:40pm:

The_Barnacle wrote on Feb 21^st, 2016 at 11:57am:

To the owner occupier, the value of the house means very little. We all have to live somewhere so if we sell our house we also have to buy one.

High house prices only really benefit those who have investment properties (the rich) and are detrimental to first home buyers and renters (the poor).

Well that is total bullsh1t.

Homeowners care very much what their home are worth, If the @sre falls out of the market as nails has been praying for all these decades, then how do you think the millions of homeowners are going to feel?

Even that genius booby, would care that his house was worth considerably less that what he paid for it or what he owes; no one who actually owns a home would agree with you, because it is blatantly wrong.

It's no different than the share market but I don't see a first share buyers grant to help out first share buyers or to stop the share market from collapsing.

You do realise that your reply has nothing at all to do with what I actually posted, don't you?

It's like you have a set series of posts on this subject and your OCD forces you to post them even if they are irrelevant to the conversation.

Back to top

IP Logged

Sir lastnail

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 30900
Gender: male

Re: House values are more important than owning one
Reply #12 - Feb 21^st, 2016 at 1:13pm

BigOl64 wrote on Feb 21^st, 2016 at 1:01pm:

Sir lastnail wrote on Feb 21^st, 2016 at 12:51pm:

BigOl64 wrote on Feb 21^st, 2016 at 12:40pm:

The_Barnacle wrote on Feb 21^st, 2016 at 11:57am:

To the owner occupier, the value of the house means very little. We all have to live somewhere so if we sell our house we also have to buy one.

High house prices only really benefit those who have investment properties (the rich) and are detrimental to first home buyers and renters (the poor).

Well that is total bullsh1t.

Homeowners care very much what their home are worth, If the @sre falls out of the market as nails has been praying for all these decades, then how do you think the millions of homeowners are going to feel?

Even that genius booby, would care that his house was worth considerably less that what he paid for it or what he owes; no one who actually owns a home would agree with you, because it is blatantly wrong.

It's no different than the share market but I don't see a first share buyers grant to help out first share buyers or to stop the share market from collapsing.

You do realise that your reply has nothing at all to do with what I actually posted, don't you?

It's like you have a set series of posts on this subject and your OCD forces you to post them even if they are irrelevant to the conversation.

Why would anyone who owns and lives in a house give a flying bugger what it is worth unless they have f.ckall equity in it ?

The point I am trying to make is that house hoarders should stop offloading their risk onto other tax payers and you libbos should stop using the plight of the poor renter and owner occupiers to defend your greedy agendas.

Back to top

"If you take out Saddam, I guarantee you that it will have enormous positive reverberations on the region..." - Benjamin Netanyahu in 1995

IP Logged

BigOl64

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 14438
Townsville QLD
Gender: male

Re: House values are more important than owning one
Reply #13 - Feb 21^st, 2016 at 1:30pm

Sir lastnail wrote on Feb 21^st, 2016 at 1:13pm:

BigOl64 wrote on Feb 21^st, 2016 at 1:01pm:

Sir lastnail wrote on Feb 21^st, 2016 at 12:51pm:

BigOl64 wrote on Feb 21^st, 2016 at 12:40pm:

The_Barnacle wrote on Feb 21^st, 2016 at 11:57am:

To the owner occupier, the value of the house means very little. We all have to live somewhere so if we sell our house we also have to buy one.

High house prices only really benefit those who have investment properties (the rich) and are detrimental to first home buyers and renters (the poor).

Well that is total bullsh1t.

Homeowners care very much what their home are worth, If the @sre falls out of the market as nails has been praying for all these decades, then how do you think the millions of homeowners are going to feel?

Even that genius booby, would care that his house was worth considerably less that what he paid for it or what he owes; no one who actually owns a home would agree with you, because it is blatantly wrong.

It's no different than the share market but I don't see a first share buyers grant to help out first share buyers or to stop the share market from collapsing.

You do realise that your reply has nothing at all to do with what I actually posted, don't you?

It's like you have a set series of posts on this subject and your OCD forces you to post them even if they are irrelevant to the conversation.

Why would anyone who owns and lives in a house give a flying bugger what it is worth unless they have f.ckall equity in it ?

The point I am trying to make is that house hoarders should stop offloading their risk onto other tax payers and you libbos should stop using the plight of the poor renter and owner occupiers to defend your greedy agendas.

As a renter your opinion about home ownership is wrong as well as irrelevant and again, your post has fkk all to do with this particular conversation and therefore also irrelevant.

Back to top

IP Logged

Kiron22

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 896
Gender: male

Re: House values are more important than owning one
Reply #14 - Feb 21^st, 2016 at 2:28pm

"Investment" shouldn't even be a term used on a house, more like "price speculation".

A House is not a productive asset, the fact there is literally any subsidy for "property investment" is absurd.

Imagine all those billions being poured into manufacturing, IT, R&D instead etc. Australia wouldn't be the first world backwater it is.

Back to top

IP Logged