Chimp_Logic wrote on Feb 12^th, 2016 at 7:12pm:



have you found one that's been verified?

lee wrote on Feb 12^th, 2016 at 7:15pm:


surely you have a theoretical framework that underpins a static or declining thermal model.

Go on lee - just one

reveal ONE model and its scientific background so I can have a laugh in public

Even the fossil fuel industry cannot steep that low as to BS to the public with a deception model.

But this may be possible with the Great lee ladies and gentlemen.

Soren wrote on Feb 12^th, 2016 at 7:05pm:


By the AGW community, I presume that you mean the experts in the field of climatology.

I'm dying to find out what an incredible epiphany you have had in order to be able to set yourself in a superior position to the  authorities in the field, especially with such an eye-wateringly arrogant bluster, to use your own phrase.   

Do you have more substance to your argument bluster than

"Ahem - well I don't know that sciency stuff, so nobody else can possibly know."

- because that seems to be the crux of your argument bluster right now.

I'll tell you what. I'll give you the benefit of the doubt.  The best way to demonstrate that you actually know what you're talking about is to do Lee's homework for him. He has tried and failed. Now it's up to you to lead the vanguard and demonstrate that, despite initial impressions,  you're not actually full of excrement.

John_Taverner wrote on Feb 12^th, 2016 at 7:56pm:



That's not how I recall it. But you have shown you have different standards of proof.

John_Taverner wrote on Feb 12^th, 2016 at 8:02pm:



And you have not proven yourself even remotely competent.

No temperature predictions of the AGW crowd has ever been correct simply because no body understands how the climate actually works and changes over decades. Nobody, not experts, not activists, not professors, nobody The 'limiting AGW to max 2 degrees ' is even more stupid and is peddled only by activists.

Total CO2 in the natural COE cycle? 750 gigatons. Human CoE emissions? 30 gigatons. That's 4% of the natural CO2.

But that 4% is overwhelming the system that has been happily dealing with other 96%. That 4% would cause warming by 4-6 degrees by 2100, they claim. But they have a fix - limit that 4% so the warming will be no more than 2 degrees. (thats average 2 degrees, not a uniform 2 degrees everywhere, you know. But they can fix that too, don't you worry about it and above all, never doubt them)

See this: https://www.skepticalscience.com/human-co2-smaller-than-natural-emissions.htm, written by this guy: https://gpwayne.wordpress.com/  Not exactly a scientist or an expert, is he? He is an out of work computer geek and graphomaniac.





It's just too stupid.

Soren wrote on Feb 13^th, 2016 at 1:48pm:


Inaccurate too.