bogarde73 wrote on Feb 9
th, 2016 at 8:26am:
We obviously have a disagreement on this.
On my side, I feel it is a matter of great concern when the nationally-funded broadcaster has been found to have lied to its audience, a matter deserving of great condemnation at the very least.
On your side, you don't.
geez, they mixed up their quotes and reported that the story that applied to a 10 y old occurred to a 5 yr old ... my gosh, how can they live with themselves

meanwhile, All of Murdochs Australian papers the other week had front page stories of how Abbott 'had a secret one on one meeting with Obama', how the president never makes one on one meetings with backbenchers but made an exception for Abbott because he is such a great man

you know what the truth was? Obama had a fundraising lunch with 100 select people, one of which was MURDOCH . Abbott was there as Murdochs guest only, there was no 'secret' meeting and the only time he spoke to Obama was the few seconds that it took Obama to shake his hand (Obama shook the hand of everyones that was present)
Murdoch fed this story to his editors and he lied about it to try and manipulate Australian politics. How many threads did you start on it?
Come back to me about journalistic integrity when you stop being a hypocrite about it.